ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Pain, delirium, and sedation should be assessed routinely using validated assessment scales. Inappropriately managed pain, delirium, and sedation in critically ill patients can have serious consequences regarding mortality, morbidity, and increased healthcare costs. Despite the benefits of a bundled approach to pain, delirium, and sedation assessments, few studies have explored nurses' perceptions of using validated scales for such assessments. Furthermore, no studies have examined nurses' perceptions of undertaking these assessments as a bundled approach. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to explore nurses' knowledge, perceptions, attitudes, and experiences regarding the use of validated pain, delirium, and sedation assessment tools as a bundled approach in the intensive care unit (ICU). METHODS: A qualitative exploratory descriptive design was adopted. We conducted four focus groups and 10 individual interviews with 23 nurses from a 26-bed adult ICU at an Australian metropolitan tertiary teaching hospital. Data were analysed using thematic analysis techniques. FINDINGS: Four themes were identified: (i) factors impacting nurses' ability to undertake pain, delirium, and sedation assessments in the ICU; (ii) use, misuse, and nonuse of tools and use of alternative strategies to assess pain, delirium, and sedation; (iii) implementing assessment tools; and (iv) consequences of suboptimal pain, delirium, and sedation assessments. A gap was found in nurses' use of validated scales to assess pain, delirium, and sedation as a bundled approach, and they were not familiar with using a bundled approach to assessment. CONCLUSION: The practice gap could be addressed using a carefully planned implementation strategy. Strategies could include a policy and protocol for assessing pain, delirium, and sedation in the ICU, engagement of change champions to facilitate uptake of the strategy, reminder and feedback systems, further in-service education, and ongoing workplace training for nurses.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: When a relative is admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU), stress, anxiety, and failure to cope may place families, and the patient, at risk for adverse psychological outcomes. Family participation in patient care may improve patient and family outcomes. However, to date, little is known about how families perceive and participate in patient care in ICU, and there is limited research to guide clinicians about supporting family participation in this context. OBJECTIVE: To describe family perspectives of participation in patient care in adult ICU. METHODS: Using a qualitative design, observation and interview data were collected from a convenience sample of 30 family members in the ICU at two metropolitan hospitals in Melbourne, Australia. An independent third party was used to recruit potential participants. Naturalistic observations and semi-structured interviews explored families' actions and perceptions of participation. Data were integrated and subject to thematic analyses. FINDINGS: The major theme Families as part of the healthcare team reflected family perspectives of their own significant contribution to supporting their relative's recovery while they were in ICU. Families' perception of their participation in patient care was characterised by three sub-themes: 1) Motivators for family participation; 2) Family roles during recovery; and 3) Influences on family participation. Families' perceived reassurance and companionship as important contributions to patient care. CONCLUSION: Families perceived their contribution to the patient's psychosocial and emotional well-being to be one of the most important aspects of participation. Nevertheless, their role in the healthcare team was influenced by several motivational factors. Results of this study can inform further research to test the effectiveness of clinical practice and educational interventions aligned with family preferences to promote participation and enhance patient and family-centered care in ICU.
