The use of capnography in the air medical environment.

We can count on two things when we receive a call as part of an air medical transport team--the patient is in critical condition, and time is of the essence. Whether the patient has experienced trauma from a motor vehicle crash, has fallen, or has suffered an insult as a consequence of poor health, our technique, skill, and judgment are tested constantly. Fortunately, we have equipment at our disposal to make our job easier. One of the more difficult aspects and responsibilities of air medical transport teams is placement of an endotracheal tube (ET). Along with the techniques used for successful endotracheal intubation (ETI), available technology can maximize patients' ventilatory status using an instrument that detects expired carbon dioxide (CO(2)) levels.

A national survey of air medical infectious disease control practices.

INTRODUCTION: Caring for an infectious patient in the air medical environment presents a special challenge to all air crew members (ACMs) involved. The purpose of this study was to survey the infectious disease control practices of air medical programs (AMPs) that are members of the Association of Air Medical Services. METHODS: A structured telephone survey was designed to gather data. Using one interviewer (an undergraduate student) with no knowledge of the study's goal minimized experimental bias. AMPs from 151 geographically selected areas were called between June and August 1996. Only the programs' chief flight nurses (CFNs) were targeted as respondents. RESULTS: The response rate was 91% (138 of 151). Although no program refused to participate, 13 CFNs were unavailable to be interviewed. Mission profile was 32% scene and 68% interhospital with an annual average of 950 patient transports per program. Transport type was 61% rotor-wing aircraft, 17% fixed-wing, and 22% both. Flight physicals for ACMs were required by 57% of the AMPs. Pre-employment screenings for rubella, tuberculosis (TB), and varicella were noted. Interestingly, 17% of the AMPs reported pre-employment HIV testing. Immunization was mandated by 57% of AMPs, including hepatitis B virus, measles, rubella, and tetanus. Nine percent of the respondents refused to accept a transport with specific contagious conditions, primarily TB. A formal decontamination policy was in effect at 88% of the AMPs, and OSHA-approved filter masks were available at 70%. Pathogen exposure reporting was required by 97%. CONCLUSION: A current, comprehensive infection control program, continuing education, and 100% compliance with standard precautions will help reduce the possibility of accidental exposures. These strategies to reduce transmission also can be extended during training sessions to the prehospital and hospital personnel with whom the air medical program serves.

The impact of multiple patient transport on patient care in helicopter emergency medical services.

INTRODUCTION: Many helicopter emergency medical services can transport either one (singles) or two (doubles) patients. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the additional patient in the doubles flight had an adverse impact on patient care because of the deceased provider-to-patient ratio. SETTING: Patients were flown by a Level 1 trauma center-based helicopter emergency medical service staffed by a nurse and paramedic. METHOD. A retrospective record and trauma registry review comparing 124 randomly selected scene trauma singles frequency-matched to 100 doubles (1/89 through 6/92) was performed. Data collected included patient demographics, Injury Severity Score, Glasgow Coma Scale, Revised Trauma Score, mechanism of injury, scene time, and ground ALS and helicopter emergency medical services procedures performed. RESULTS: Doubles accounted for 6.5% of all on-scene helicopter emergency medical service trauma patient transports. Paired comparison of Glasgow Coma Scale, Revised Trauma Score, and Injury Severity Score revealed that only one of the doubles patients had a field Glasgow Coma Scale as low, or a Injury Severity Score as high as the average singles. Revised trauma scores were equivalent. Although more procedures were performed during doubles missions, no procedures were performed in most singles missions (58%) and a substantial minority of doubles missions (41%). No differences were found between the groups in change in Glasgow Coma Scale during flight. CONCLUSION: Only of the two patients during doubles missions was as severely injured as the average patient in a singles transport. The decreased ratio of helicopter emergency medical service crew to patients in doubles missions does not jeopardize patient care because few procedures were performed during either singles or doubles missions.