Improvement of Low-Grade Inflammation in Patients with Metabolically Healthy Severe Obesity After Primary Bariatric Surgery.

INTRODUCTION: The inflammatory state that accompanies adiposity and the metabolic syndrome (MetS) is called "low-grade" inflammation. White blood cell count (WBC) has been proposed as an emerging biomarker for predicting future cardiovascular events, MetS and mortality. Bariatric surgery (BS) improves comorbidities associated with obesity and the MetS and the surgically induced weight loss is known to improve inflammatory status. OBJECTIVES: To analyze the improvement of low-grade inflammation associated to obesity in patients with metabolically healthy severe obesity (MHSO) and patients with metabolically unhealthy obesity (MUSO) (severe obesity with MetS) after primary bariatric surgery as well as the protective effect of BS against the development of MetS in patients with MHSO by reducing the WBC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of patients undergoing laparoscopic primary BS (gastric by-pass or sleeve gastrectomy) from January 2004-December 2015. Outcomes included changing of low-grade inflammation in terms of leukocytes, neutrophils, lymphocytes, and platelets. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients with MHSO and 167 patients with MUSO underwent laparoscopic primary BS. The preoperative values of leukocyte and platelet were statistically higher in the group of patients with MHSO. In both groups, there was significant postoperative decrease of inflammatory markers. The greatest drop in WBC occurred in the second postoperative year. No patient of the group of patients with MHSO developed MetS within five postoperative years. CONCLUSIONS: Surgically induced weight loss plays an important role for improvement in chronic inflammation associated to obesity because of reduction of visceral fat mass. MHSO associates a low-grade chronic inflammatory status comparable to MUSO. The improvement or decrease of low-grade inflammation in patients with metabolically healthy severe obesity after bariatric surgery could have a protective effect against the development of MetS and medical conditions associated with severe obesity.

The Benefit of Bariatric Surgery on Histological Features of Metabolic Associated Fatty Liver Disease Assessed Through Noninvasive Methods.

BACKGROUND: In patients with clinically severe obesity, metabolic associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) and steatohepatitis are highly prevalent. There is a lack of prospective studies evaluating the impact of bariatric surgery (BS) on MAFLD using both noninvasive and histological criteria. The present study aims to assess the impact of BS on MAFLD using histological and biochemical criteria. METHODS: This is a prospective study of 52 patients subjected to BS. Noninvasive fibrosis risk scores (NIFRS) along with anthropometric, clinical, and biochemical parameters were recorded pre- and 12 months post-BS. Liver biopsy was obtained in all individuals at baseline (wedge biopsy) and was repeated at 12 months (percutaneous Tru-cut) in those diagnosed with steatohepatitis. The primary outcome was the change in the degree of steatohepatitis and fibrosis. The secondary outcome was the change in scores for hepatocellular ballooning, lobular inflammation, steatosis, and fibrosis. RESULTS: One year after BS, steatohepatitis resolved in core biopsies with no worsening of fibrosis in 95.7% of individuals (n = 21, 95% CI: 87.3-100), and 13 (56.5%) exhibited complete resolution. Of 15 patients with fibrosis at baseline, 13 (86.7%) showed improvement and 12 exhibited fibrosis resolution. The values of transaminases improved, but only gamma glutamyl transferase (GGT) showed statistical significance. Among the NIFRS, NAFLD fibrosis score (NFS) and Hepamet fibrosis score (HFS) showed significant improvement. CONCLUSIONS: In the setting it was studied, BS improved or resolved steatohepatitis and fibrosis in patients with obesity. NIFRS, especially NFS and HFS, and levels of GGT could be used as markers of recovery of liver function after BS.

Prevalence and predictors of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis in patients with morbid obesity.

BACKGROUND: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is highly prevalent in morbid obesity (MO). A considerable proportion of patients with MO have non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Liver biopsy (LB) is the only procedure that reliably differentiates NASH from other stages of NAFLD, but its invasive nature prevents it from being generalisable. Hence, non-invasive assessment is critical in this group of patients. OBJECTIVES: To report NAFLD/NASH prevalence in a cohort of patients with MO and to identify predictors of NASH. METHODS: Fifty-two consecutive patients subjected to bariatric surgery in a University hospital in Spain underwent LB. Anthropometric, clinical and biochemical variables were registered. According of the results of the LB, individuals were classified by whether they had NASH or not. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent factors associated with NASH. RESULTS: NAFLD was reported in 94.2% of the patients, simple steatosis was present in 51.92% and NASH in 42.31%. Meanwhile, 17.3% of patients exhibited significant fibrosis (≥F2). HIGHT score for NASH risk was established using five independent predictors: systemic Hypertension, Insulin resistance, Gamma-glutamyl transferase, High density lipoprotein cholesterol and alanine Transaminase. This score ranges from 0 to 7 and was used to predict NASH in our cohort (area under the receiver operator characteristic curve 0.846). A score of 4 or greater implied high risk (sensitivity 77.3%, specificity 73.3%, positive predictive value 68%, negative predictive value 81.5%, accuracy 75%). CONCLUSIONS: NAFLD is practically a constant in MO with a considerable proportion of patients presenting NASH. The combination of five independent predictors in a scoring system may help the clinician optimise the selection of patients with MO for LB.

Prevalence and predictors of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis in patients with morbid obesity.

BACKGROUND: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is highly prevalent in morbid obesity (MO). A considerable proportion of patients with MO have non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Liver biopsy (LB) is the only procedure that reliably differentiates NASH from other stages of NAFLD, but its invasive nature prevents it from being generalisable. Hence, non-invasive assessment is critical in this group of patients. OBJECTIVES: To report NAFLD/NASH prevalence in a cohort of patients with MO and to identify predictors of NASH. METHODS: Fifty-two consecutive patients subjected to bariatric surgery in a University hospital in Spain underwent LB. Anthropometric, clinical and biochemical variables were registered. According of the results of the LB, individuals were classified by whether they had NASH or not. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent factors associated with NASH. RESULTS: NAFLD was reported in 94.2% of the patients, simple steatosis was present in 51.92% and NASH in 42.31%. Meanwhile, 17.3% of patients exhibited significant fibrosis (≥F2). HIGHT score for NASH risk was established using five independent predictors: systemic Hypertension, Insulin resistance, Gamma-glutamyl transferase, High density lipoprotein cholesterol and alanine Transaminase. This score ranges from 0 to 7 and was used to predict NASH in our cohort (area under the receiver operator characteristic curve 0.846). A score of 4 or greater implied high risk (sensitivity 77.3%, specificity 73.3%, positive predictive value 68%, negative predictive value 81.5%, accuracy 75%). CONCLUSIONS: NAFLD is practically a constant in MO with a considerable proportion of patients presenting NASH. The combination of five independent predictors in a scoring system may help the clinician optimise the selection of patients with MO for LB.

Performance of Noninvasive Liver Fibrosis Scores in the Morbid Obese Patient, Same Scores but Different Thresholds.

INTRODUCTION: Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most common cause of chronic liver disease. It is a spectrum of progressive alterations, with the final step in liver fibrosis which carries a high burden of long-term mortality. The scores used to predict liver fibrosis are not properly validated in morbid obesity (MO). Our aim was to evaluate the performance of seven risk scores in bariatric surgery (BS) patients. METHODS: Cross-sectional analysis in a cohort of 60 patients with MO undergoing BS. Liver biopsy (LB) was taken and compared with fibrosis risk assessed by noninvasive scores: APRI, FIB-4, Forns, NFS (NAFLD fibrosis score), BARD, BAAT, and Hepamet. The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUROC) and measures of diagnostic accuracy were calculated; performance of fibrosis scores was evaluated at standard threshold vs those suggested by ROC analysis. RESULTS: LB was available in 50 patients; 9 (18%) had significant fibrosis (F2-F4). The BARD and Forns scores best predicted the absence of fibrosis, both with negative predictive value (NPV) of 95.5%, with AUROC of 0.761 and 0.667, respectively. Modification of standard thresholds (2 for BARD and 6.9 for Forns) to those suggested by ROC analysis (3 and 3.6, respectively) improved performance of scores. Basal glucose, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), aspartate transaminase (AST), and gamma glutamyl transferase (GGT) were identified by logistic regression analysis as independent predictor of fibrosis. CONCLUSIONS: Existing scoring systems are unable to stratify fibrosis risk in MO using established thresholds; its performance is improved if these cutoffs are modified.

Long-term results of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication with or without short gastric vessels division.

BACKGROUND: It has been claimed that division of the short gastric vessels (SGV) during laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF) could reduce the risk of postoperative dysphagia. The aim of this study was to compare patients who underwent LNF with (SGV+) or without (SGV-) SGV division in our institution and present long-term results. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective case note review study of patients undergoing LNF with or without division of the SGV. Outcomes included DeMeester score, low esophageal sphincter resting pressure, and upper endoscopy. Operative time and patient satisfaction were also recorded. RESULTS: Between February 2004 and February 2007, a total of 123 patients underwent LNF, 59 (48.0%) SGV- and 64 (52.0%) SGV+. The 2 groups were statistically comparable. There was no significant difference about median DeMeester score, low esophageal sphincter resting pressure, and long-term satisfaction score between the 2 groups at a mean of 4 years of follow-up (range, 36 to 60 mo). The mean operative time was statistically significantly lower in the SGV- patients (90 vs. 115 min, P=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Our experience suggests that LNF without division of SGV provides a good clinical and functional outcome, whereas division of the SGV is associated with longer operative times.

Is prophylactic cholecystectomy useful in obese patients undergoing gastric bypass?

BACKGROUND: Obesity constitutes a clear risk factor for cholelithiasis, especially if it is associated with a rapid weight loss, as is the case of patients following bariatric surgery. Prophylactic cholecystectomy is indicated in biliopancreatic diversions due to the high incidence of postoperative cholelithiasis. However, there is no agreement on gastric bypass. This study was conducted to establish the incidence of cholecystopathy demonstrated by histology and to assess the indication for prophylactic cholecystectomy in a systematic way on patients undergoing gastric bypass. METHODS: The evaluation is based on 100 consecutive morbidly obese patients undergoing open gastric bypass surgery with concomitant prophylactic cholecystectomy. Variables studied were: age, gender, body mass index, preoperative ultrasound and the anatomopathologic analysis of the gallbladder that was removed. RESULTS: Of the 100 patients who took part in the trial, 11 had had a previous cholecystectomy. Among the 89 patients remaining, preoperative ultrasound diagnosis of cholelithiasis was 16.8%, and the actual postoperative incidence was 24.7%. Other histologic alterations were: cholesterolosis 46.1%, chronic unspecified cholecystitis 22.5%, and granulomatous cholecystitis 1.1%. The total incidence of cholecystopathy was 93.3%. The morbi-mortality related to cholecystectomy was 0%. CONCLUSIONS: Based on these results and given the absence of morbidity, we believe that prophylactic cholecystectomy is suitable during open gastric bypass.

Supervivencia del cáncer de mama diagnosticado como lesión mamaria no palpable / Survival in nonpalpable breast cancer diagnosed as nonpalpable breast lesions

Introducción. El carcinoma de mama no palpable supone alrededor del 30 por ciento de todos los cánceres de mama debido al uso generalizado de la mamografía. El objetivo de este trabajo es determinar la supervivencia de las pacientes con cáncer de mama diagnosticado como lesión mamaria no palpable. Material y métodos. Se analizó de manera retrospectiva el historial clínico de 110 pacientes con lesiones mamarias no palpables. La lesión mamográfica se clasificó como microcalcificaciones, nódulo y distorsiones o asimetría. En las pacientes con carcinoma se realizó cirugía conservadora si cumplían los siguientes criterios: estadios 0, I o II, proporción volumen mamario/tumoral aceptable, lesión solitaria, microcalcificaciones focales y paciente conforme con el tratamiento. Resultados. En el estudio histológico 64 lesiones (57,6 por ciento) fueron carcinomas. En la clasificación TNM patológica el 32,7 por ciento pertenecían al estadio 0, el 43,6 por ciento al I y el 23 por ciento al II. Se realizó cirugía conservadora en 108 pacientes (98 por ciento). La supervivencia global ha sido del 100 por ciento y la supervivencia libre de enfermedad del 95 por ciento, con una recidiva local del 5 por ciento. Conclusiones. El estudio de las lesiones mamarias no palpables permite diagnosticar a un mayor número de pacientes con cáncer de mama en estadio temprano, realizar cirugía conservadora en un mayor número de pacientes e incrementar la supervivencia libre de enfermedad y la supervivencia global (AU)