Temozolomide and radiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in high grade gliomas: a very long term comparative study and literature review.

UNLABELLED: Temozolomide (TMZ) is the first line drug in the care of high grade gliomas. The combined treatment of TMZ plus radiotherapy is more effective in the care of brain gliomas then radiotherapy alone. Aim of this report is a survival comparison, on a long time (>10 years) span, of glioma patients treated with radiotherapy alone and with radiotherapy + TMZ. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this report we retrospectively reviewed the outcome of 128 consecutive pts with diagnosis of high grade gliomas referred to our institutions from April 1994 to November 2001. The first 64 pts were treated with RT alone and the other 64 with a combination of RT and adjuvant or concomitant TMZ. RESULTS: Grade 3 (G3) haematological toxicity was recorded in 6 (9%) of 64 pts treated with RT and TMZ. No G4 haematological toxicity was observed. Age, histology, and administration of TMZ were statistically significant prognostic factors associated with 2 years overall survival (OS). PFS was for GBM 9 months, for AA 11. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of RT and TMZ improves long term survival in glioma patients. Our results confirm the superiority of the combination on a long time basis.

Intermediate neoadjuvant radiotherapy for T3 low/middle rectal cancer: postoperative outcomes of a non-controlled clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: The benefits of adjuvant radiotherapy in rectal carcinoma are well known. However, there is still considerable uncertainty about the optimal radiation treatment. There is an ongoing debate about the choice between very short treatments immediately followed by surgical resection and prolonged treatments with delayed surgery. In this paper, we describe an interim analysis of a non-controlled clinical trial in which radiotherapy delivered with intermediate dose/duration was followed by surgery after about 2 weeks to improve local control and survival after curative radiosurgery for cT3 low/middle rectal cancer. METHODS: Preoperative radiotherapy (36 Gy in 3 weeks) was delivered in 248 consecutive patients with cT3NxM0 rectal adenocarcinoma within 10 cm from the anal verge, followed by surgery within the third week after treatment completion. RESULTS: 166 patients (66.94%) underwent anterior resection, 80 patients (32.26%) the Miles' procedure and 2 patients (0.8%) the Hartmann's procedure. Local resectability rate was 99.6%, with 226 curative-intent resections. The overall rate of complications was 27.4%. 5-year oncologic outcomes were evaluated on 223 patients. The median follow-up time was 8.9 years (range 5-17.4 years); local recurrence (LR) rate and distal recurrence (DR) rate after 5 years were 6.28% and 21.97%, respectively. Overall survival was 74.2%; disease free survival was 73.5%; local control was 93.4 % and metastasis-free survival was 82.1%. CONCLUSIONS: preoperative radiotherapy with intermediate dose/duration and interval between radiotherapy and surgery achieves high local control in patients with cT3NxM0 rectal cancer, and high DR rate seems to be the major limitation to improved survival.

Effectiveness of neoadjuvant radiotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer: a single-center experience in 263 patients.

AIM: To determine the frequency of local recurrence (LR) and distant recurrence (DR) with 5-year survival analysis. METHODS: Patients with T3-T4 rectal cancer located within 10 cm from the anal verge. Radiotherapy protocol: 36 Gy, delivered in 12 daily doses of 3 Gy each for 5 days/week, followed by surgery after a 2-week break. RESULTS: 263 patients were recruited. Radiotherapy was well tolerated. None of the patients broke off treatment. Complete histological response was 3% and maximum radio-induced downstaging 31.4%. Overall complication rate was 25.8% and direct radio-induced complications 0.4%. Mean duration of treatment was 35.7 days. In 172 patients with a minimum follow-up of 5 years, the rate of LR was 6.0% and DR 24.4%. Five-year overall survival was 70.2%, overall specific survival 78.0%, disease-free survival 70.7%, LR-free specific survival 92.9%, and DR-free specific survival 73.5%. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, local disease control was achieved in 94% of patients. Any changes in our treatment protocols will aim at improving results in terms of LR and DR. In view of the four-fold higher rate of DR as compared to LR, improvement of DR can be defined as the challenge for the future.

Temozolomide and radiotherapy as first-line treatment of high-grade gliomas.

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: Temozolomide, a novel alkylating agent, has shown promising results in the treatment of patients with high-grade gliomas, when used as single agent as well as in combination with radiation therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this report we retrospectively reviewed the clinical outcome of 128 consecutive patients with a diagnosis of high-grade gliomas referred to our Institutions from April 1994 to November 2001. The first 64 patients were treated with radiotherapy alone and the other 64 with a combination of radiotherapy and temozolomide (31 with radiotherapy and adjuvant temozolomide and 33 with radiotherapy and concomitant temozolomide followed by adjuvant temozolomide). RESULTS: Grade 3 hematological toxicity was scored in 9% of 64 patients treated with radiotherapy and temozolomide. No grade 4 hematological toxicity was reported, and the other acute side effects observed were mild or easily controlled with medications. Age, histology and administration of temozolomide were statistically significant prognostic factors associated with better 2-year overall survival. In contrast, we did not observe a significant difference in overall survival between adjuvant and concomitant/adjuvant temozolomide administration. CONCLUSIONS: We report the favorable results of a schedule combining radiotherapy and temozolomide in the treatment of patients with high-grade gliomas. The literature data and above all the findings of the phase III EORTC-NCIC 26981 trial suggest that actually the schedule can be used routinely in clinical practice. Further clinical studies, using temozolomide in combination with other agents, are required.