ABSTRACT
Operating room (OR) efficiency is a hot topic in OR management studies. Benefits of OR efficiency maximization include financial savings, improved patient safety, greater satisfaction for patients and health workers, and increased productivity. However, how to measure the efficiency of an OR suite still remains a pending question. Many performance indicators have been developed (1) and one of the most frequent approaches consists of choosing a set of indicators to create a dashboard for the monitoring of surgical activities. Macario proposed a scoring system based on eight performance indicators (2). A similar approach was used in The Canadian Paediatric Surgical Wait Times Project (3). Although the use of dashboards and scoring systems allows for a wide and in-depth understanding of the numerous factors that contribute to efficiency, it may also raise problems. The use of multiple indicators involves gathering large amounts of data that are not routinely available in every context and are subject to different interpretations if metrics show divergent trends. Moreover, it is not possible to properly establish relative weights among metrics. We propose a different approach, based on a single and overall indicator that can be used as a proxy for OR efficiency. We considered four elements as a minimum set for composing our indicator: raw utilization (RU), turn-over time (TT), preparation time (PT) and case cancellation (CC) (4). RU formed the basis for our considerations, as it is one of the most common and widespread performance indicators. RU represents the percent of time that patients spend in OR during resource hours.
Subject(s)
Efficiency, Organizational , Operating Rooms , Canada , Child , HumansABSTRACT
Novel coronavirus 2019 is a single-stranded, ribonucleic acid virus that has led to an international pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019. Clinical data from the Chinese outbreak have been reported, but experiences and recommendations from clinical practice during the Italian outbreak have not. We report the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 outbreak on regional and national healthcare infrastructure. We also report on recommendations based on clinical experiences of managing patients throughout Italy. In particular, we describe key elements of clinical management, including: safe oxygen therapy; airway management; personal protective equipment; and non-technical aspects of caring for patients diagnosed with coronavirus disease 2019. Only through planning, training and team working will clinicians and healthcare systems be best placed to deal with the many complex implications of this new pandemic.
Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/therapy , Disease Outbreaks , Pneumonia, Viral/therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , COVID-19 , Child , Child, Preschool , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Intubation, Intratracheal , Italy/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Oxygen/therapeutic use , Pandemics , Personal Protective Equipment , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Young AdultABSTRACT
Tracheostomy decannulation has always been considered a procedure with an attendant risk, especially in patients with a reduced upper airway diameter as is commonly observed in the obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) population. We report on 4 cases where transoral robotic surgery (TORS) helped in the management of long-term cannulated patients. The aims of our paper are: 1. To demonstrate how the otolaryngology team can help identify patients at high risk for decannulation failure; and 2. To demonstrate how TORS may aid in the decannulation process of patients at high risk for failure due to severe tongue base hypertrophy. From our experience, TORS appears to offer an effective option to aid in the decannulation of patients with a severe hypertrophy of the base of tongue and floppy epiglottis.
Subject(s)
Device Removal , Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods , Tracheostomy , Adult , Aged , Catheterization/instrumentation , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Mouth , Risk AssessmentABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common disease which increases the risk of perioperative complications. The aim of this study is to assess the clinical utility of preoperative screening for OSA in determining the prevalence of patients at high risk of OSA in a surgical population, the incidence of difficult airway management and the incidence of perioperative complications. METHODS: We conducted a multisite, prospective observational study on adult patients scheduled for elective surgery. All patients completed a STOP-Bang questionnaire as a part of their preoperative evaluation. Collected data included: demographic data, type of surgery, ASA class, postoperative course, complications within 48 hours, difficult intubation (DI) and difficult mask ventilation (DMV) rates. RESULTS: A total of 3452 consecutive patients were recruited; 2997 (87%) were identified as low OSA risk patients and 455 (13%) were identified as high OSA risk patients; 113 (3%) postoperative complications, 315 (9%) cases of DMV and 375 (11%) of DI were observed. The percentage of postoperative complications in patients with HR-OSA was 9%, while the percentage of DI was 20% and the percentage of DMV was 23%. High risk for OSA and higher BMI (≥30 Kg m-2) were independently associated with risk for perioperative complications. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, this study demonstrates that the prevalence of high OSA risk patients in the surgical population is high. The increase in the rates of perioperative complications justifies the implementation of perioperative strategies that use the STOP-Bang as a tool for triage.
Subject(s)
Elective Surgical Procedures/methods , Preoperative Care/methods , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/diagnosis , Surveys and Questionnaires , Aged , Elective Surgical Procedures/standards , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/mortality , Prospective Studies , Respiration, Artificial/adverse effects , Respiration, Artificial/methods , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/epidemiology , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/therapySubject(s)
Foreign Bodies/surgery , Hypopharynx , Laryngoscopy/methods , Emergencies , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Video RecordingABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: While bronchoscopy should be considered in patients with acute lung injury (ALI) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in which the cause cannot be determined from history or clinical and laboratory data, there are no studies about the utility of rapid on-site examination (ROSE) of broncho-alveolar lavage for identification, as early as possible, of the pathological condition underlying the onset of this condition. The aim of this prospective, observational study was to evaluate the diagnostic role of ROSE of BAL in ALI/ARDS. METHODS: 71 patients with ALI/ARDS underwent bronchoalveolar lavage, and one part of the sample was examined with ROSE. The on-site report was categorized as diagnostic (specific diagnosis), presence of atypical reactive type II pneumocytes with no further comments or not diagnostic. RESULTS: ROSE of bronco-alveolar lavage yielded 29 (41%) specific diagnoses, revealed typical features of diffuse alveolar damage without a specific diagnosis in 28 patients (39%) and did not reveal a specific diagnosis in the remaining 14 cases (20%). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study show that, in patients with ALI/ARDS, bronchoalveolar lavage with ROSE is diagnostic in 40% of cases: ROSE may therefore spare lung biopsies and improve the prognosis of patients with ARDS (immunocompetent or not) as therapy could be started or modified at a very early phase.