Genetic variation at CR1 increases risk of cerebral amyloid angiopathy.

OBJECTIVE: Accumulated evidence suggests that a variant within the CR1 gene (single nucleotide polymorphism rs6656401), known to increase risk for Alzheimer disease (AD), influences ß-amyloid (Aß) deposition in brain tissue. Given the biologic overlap between AD and cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA), a leading cause of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) in elderly individuals, we investigated whether rs6656401 increases the risk of CAA-related ICH and influences vascular Aß deposition. METHODS: We performed a case-control genetic association study of 89 individuals with CAA-related ICH and 280 individuals with ICH unrelated to CAA and compared them with 324 ICH-free control subjects. We also investigated the effect of rs6656401 on risk of recurrent CAA-ICH in a prospective longitudinal cohort of ICH survivors. Finally, association with severity of histopathologic CAA was investigated in 544 autopsy specimens from 2 longitudinal studies of aging. RESULTS: rs6656401 was associated with CAA-ICH (odds ratio [OR] = 1.61, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.19-2.17, p = 8.0 × 10(-4)) as well as with risk of recurrent CAA-ICH (hazard ratio = 1.35, 95% CI 1.04-1.76, p = 0.024). Genotype at rs6656401 was also associated with severity of CAA pathology at autopsy (OR = 1.34, 95% CI 1.05-1.71, p = 0.009). Adjustment for parenchymal amyloid burden did not cancel this effect, suggesting that, despite the correlation between parenchymal and vascular amyloid pathology, CR1 acts independently on both processes, thus increasing risk of both AD and CAA. CONCLUSION: The CR1 variant rs6656401 influences risk and recurrence of CAA-ICH, as well as the severity of vascular amyloid deposition.

Warfarin-related intraventricular hemorrhage: imaging and outcome.

OBJECTIVE: Oral anticoagulation therapy (OAT) with warfarin increases mortality and disability after intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), the result of increased ICH volume and risk of hematoma expansion. We investigated whether OAT also influences risk of development of intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH), the volume of IVH and IVH expansion, and whether IVH is a substantive mediator of the overall effect of OAT on ICH outcome. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected single-center cohort of 1,879 consecutive ICH cases (796 lobar, 865 deep, 153 cerebellar, 15 multiple location, 50 primary IVH) from 1999 to 2009. ICH and IVH volumes at presentation, as well as hematoma expansion (>33% or >6 mL increase) and IVH expansion (>2 mL increase), were determined using established semiautomated methods. Outcome was assessed at 90 days using either the modified Rankin Scale or Glasgow Outcome Scale. RESULTS: Warfarin use was associated with IVH risk, IVH volume at presentation, and IVH expansion in both lobar and deep ICH (all p < 0.05) in a dose-response relationship with international normalized ratio. Warfarin was associated with poor outcome in both lobar and deep ICH (p < 0.01), and >95% of this effect was accounted for by baseline ICH and IVH volumes, as well as ICH and IVH expansion. CONCLUSION: Warfarin increases IVH volume and risk of IVH expansion in lobar and deep ICH. These findings (along with effects on ICH volume and expansion) likely represent the mechanisms by which anticoagulation worsens ICH functional outcome.

Statin use and outcome after intracerebral hemorrhage: case-control study and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is a highly lethal disease of the elderly. Use of statins is increasingly widespread among the elderly, and therefore common in patients who develop ICH. Accumulating data suggests that statins have neuroprotective effects, but their association with ICH outcome has been inconsistent. We therefore performed a meta-analysis of all available evidence, including unpublished data from our own institution, to determine whether statin exposure is protective for patients who develop ICH. METHODS: In our prospectively ascertained cohort, we compared 90-day functional outcome in 238 pre-ICH statin cases and 461 statin-free ICH cases. We then meta-analyzed results from our cohort along with previously published studies using a random effects model, for a total of 698 ICH statin cases and 1,823 non-statin-exposed subjects. RESULTS: Data from our center demonstrated an association between statin use before ICH and increased probability of favorable outcome (odds ratio [OR] = 2.08, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.37-3.17) and reduced mortality (OR = 0.47, 95% CI 0.32-0.70) at 90 days. No compound-specific statin effect was identified. Meta-analysis of all published evidence confirmed the effect of statin use on good outcome (OR = 1.91, 95% CI 1.38-2.65) and mortality (OR = 0.55, 95% CI 0.42-0.72) after ICH. CONCLUSION: Antecedent use of statins prior to ICH is associated with favorable outcome and reduced mortality after ICH. This phenomenon appears to be a class effect of statins. Further studies are required to clarify the biological mechanisms underlying these observations.

Knowledge of and attitudes about Alzheimer disease genetics: report of a pilot survey and two focus groups.

OBJECTIVES: In preparation for the development of an educational intervention on Alzheimer disease (AD) genetics, we undertook a pilot survey of knowledge in this area and attitudes toward genetic testing for AD among individuals with a family history of AD. METHODS: For the pilot study, we administered a 30-min questionnaire to 57 unaffected individuals from a genetic linkage study. For the focus groups, we interviewed two groups of subjects, ages 44-70 years, with a family history of AD, one of 10 Caucasians and the other of 6 African-Americans. RESULTS: The pilot study showed that there was limited knowledge of genetics overall and AD genetics in particular, considerable concern about personal risk, and little knowledge of or interest in genetic testing for the disease. The focus groups reinforced and fleshed out these impressions and highlighted the importance of caregiving experience in the attitudes toward personal risk for AD. CONCLUSIONS: These results underscore the value of genetics education for this and other complex diseases and suggest specific foci for educational interventions.