ABSTRACT
Visceral leishmaniasis is an uncommon disease in transplant recipients; however, if left untreated, the mortality can be high. If an organ donor or recipient is known to be an asymptomatic Leishmania spp. carrier,monitoring is advised. This study proposes to assess the prevalence of asymptomatic Leishmania spp.infection in liver transplant donors and recipients from an endemic area. A total of 50 liver recipients and 17 liver donors were evaluated by direct parasite search, indirect fluorescent antibody test (IFAT), anti-Leishmania rK39 rapid test and Leishmania spp.DNA detection by polymerase chain reaction (PCR).Leishmania spp. amastigotes were not observed in liver or spleen tissues. Of the 67 serum samples, IFAT was reactive in 1.5% and indeterminate for 17.9%, and the anti-Leishmania rK39 rapid test was negative for all samples. The PCR test was positive for 7.5%, 8.9%, and 5.9% of blood, liver and spleen samples, respectively(accounting for 23.5% of the donors and 8% of the recipients). Leishmania infantum-specific PCR confirmed all positive samples. In conclusion, a high prevalence of asymptomatic L. infantum was observed in donors and recipients from an endemic area, and PCR was the most sensitive method for screening these individuals.
Subject(s)
Leishmaniasis, Visceral/epidemiology , Liver Transplantation/adverse effects , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Brazil/epidemiology , Child , Child, Preschool , Cross-Sectional Studies , DNA, Protozoan/analysis , Female , Fluorescent Antibody Technique , Humans , Leishmania/genetics , Leishmania infantum/immunology , Leishmaniasis, Visceral/diagnosis , Male , Middle Aged , Polymerase Chain Reaction , Prevalence , Prospective Studies , Tissue DonorsABSTRACT
The Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD), which predicts mortality on the waiting list before liver transplantation, has changed organ allocation criteria to prioritize severely ill patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of the new criteria on the incidence of Healthcare Associated Infections (HAI) and patient survival after liver transplantation. This retrospective cohort included liver transplant recipients from 2005 to 2007. Infection notification followed the recommended criteria of the National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN). Statistical analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences. Of 142 patients, 67 (47.2%) underwent transplantation before June 2006. There were no differences between the 2 periods considering patient gender, diagnosis, age, length of hospitalization, and mean time to first infection occurrence. However, the length of intensive care unit (ICU) hospitalization (P = .006) and central venous catheter (CVC) use (P = .025) were higher in the first period of the study. Comparison of time until first systemic infection before and after changes in allocation criteria showed no significant difference (log-rank = 0.06; P = .81). There was a trend toward greater lethality during the second period of the study (P = .09). There was no difference in time to death between the 2 periods (log-rank = 0.9; P = .76). However, when comparing time to death of all patients with systemic infection versus those without this event, patients without infection showed a higher mortality rate (log-rank = 15.7; P < .001).
