The impact of tinnitus characteristics and associated variables on tinnitus-related handicap.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the characteristics of tinnitus and tinnitus-related variables and explore their possible relationship with tinnitus-related handicap. METHODS: Eighty-one patients with chronic tinnitus were included. The study protocol measured hearing status, tinnitus pitch, loudness, maskability and loudness discomfort levels. All patients filled in the Tinnitus Sample Case History Questionnaire, the Hyperacusis Questionnaire and the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory. The relationship of each variable with the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory score was evaluated by univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: Five univariables were associated with the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory score: loudness discomfort level, subjective tinnitus loudness, tinnitus awareness, noise intolerance and Hyperacusis Questionnaire score. Multiple regression analysis showed that the Hyperacusis Questionnaire score and tinnitus awareness were independently associated with the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory score. CONCLUSION: Hyperacusis and tinnitus awareness were independently associated with the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory score. Questionnaires on tinnitus and hyperacusis are especially suited to providing additional insight into tinnitus-related handicap and are therefore useful for evaluating tinnitus patients.

Articulation and oromyofunctional behavior in children seeking orthodontic treatment.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this controlled study is to document articulation and oromyofunctional behavior in children seeking orthodontic treatment. In addition, relations between malocclusions, articulation, and oromyofunctional behavior are studied. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 56 children seeking orthodontic treatment. The control group, consisting of 54 subjects matched for age and gender, did not undergo orthodontic intervention. To determine the impact of the occlusion on speech, the Oral Health Impact Profile was used. Speech characteristics, intelligibility and several lip and tongue functions were analyzed using consensus evaluations. RESULTS: A significant impact of the occlusion on speech and more articulation disorders for/s,n,l,t/were found in the subjects seeking orthodontic treatment. Several other phenomena were seen more often in this group, namely more impaired lip positioning during swallowing, impaired tongue function at rest, mouth breathing, open mouth posture, lip sucking/biting, anterior tongue position at rest, and tongue thrust. Moreover, all children with a tongue thrust showed an anterior tongue position at rest. CONCLUSIONS: Children seeking orthodontics have articulatory and oromyofunctional disorders. To what extent a combined orthodontic and logopaedic treatment can result in optimal oral health (i.e. perfect dentofacial unit with perfect articulation) is subject for further multidisciplinary research.

Impact of fixed implant prosthetics using the 'all-on-four' treatment concept on speech intelligibility, articulation and oromyofunctional behaviour.

The purpose of this case control study is to determine the impact of screw-retained fixed cross-arch prostheses, supported by four osseointegrated implants, on articulation and oromyofunctional behaviour. Objective (acoustic analysis) and subjective assessment techniques were used to determine the overall intelligibility, phonetic characteristics and oromyofunctional behaviour at an average period of 7.3 months after placement of the fixed implant prosthesis in 15 patients and 9 age-matched controls with intact dentition and without prosthetic appliances. Overall satisfaction with the prosthesis was 87%, but 53% of the subjects mentioned an impact on speech. 87% of the subjects presented with one or more distortions of the consonants. The most common distortions were distortions of the sound /s/ (sigmatismus simplex, 40% and sigmatismus stridens, 33%), simplex /z/ (27%), insufficient frication of /f/ (20%), /[symbol in text]/ (20%), addental production of /d/ (20%), /t/ (20%) or /s/ sound (13%) and devoiced /d/ (7%). In the control group, no articulation disorders were noted. Oromyofunctional behaviour in both groups was normal. To what extent motor-oriented speech therapy (with focus on tongue function) immediately after periodontal treatment (after wound healing) would decrease the persistent phonetic distortions is a subject for further research.

Comparison of speech intelligibility, articulation and oromyofunctional behaviour in subjects with single-tooth implants, fixed implant prosthetics or conventional removable prostheses.

The purpose of this controlled study was to determine the impact of a single-tooth implant, fixed implant prosthesis and completely removable dental prosthesis on intelligibility, articulation and oromyofunctional behaviour. Additionally, the self-perceived overall satisfaction of the dental replacements and the effect on speech was questioned. Objective (acoustic analysis) as well as subjective assessment techniques (perceptual evaluation) were used. The satisfaction of single-tooth implant group was very high (100%) followed by a satisfaction of 87% for the fixed implant prosthesis group and 68% for the removable prosthesis group. The results of the phonetic analyses revealed a normal intelligibility and oromyofunctional behaviour in the three groups of dental replacements. Only one type of articulation disorders was observed in the single-tooth implant group, followed by three types of disorders in the removable prosthesis group and six types of disorders in the fixed implant prosthesis group. In this last group, not only 87% of the subjects showed distortions of one or more consonants but also most consonants of the Dutch language were disturbed in comparison with the single-tooth implant and removable prosthesis users. Special attention must be paid to the fricative /s/ because in more than 50% of all groups, this sound is disturbed.

A comparison of vowel productions in prelingually deaf children using cochlear implants, severe hearing-impaired children using conventional hearing aids and normal-hearing children.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare vowel productions by deaf cochlear implant (CI) children, hearing-impaired hearing aid (HA) children and normal-hearing (NH) children. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 73 children [mean age: 9;14 years (years;months)] participated: 40 deaf CI children, 34 moderately to profoundly hearing-impaired HA children and 42 NH children. For the 3 corner vowels [a], [i] and [u], F(1), F(2) and the intrasubject SD were measured using the Praat software. Spectral separation between these vowel formants and vowel space were calculated. RESULTS: The significant effects in the CI group all pertain to a higher intrasubject variability in formant values, whereas the significant effects in the HA group all pertain to lower formant values. Both hearing-impaired subgroups showed a tendency toward greater intervowel distances and vowel space. CONCLUSION: Several subtle deviations in the vowel production of deaf CI children and hearing-impaired HA children could be established, using a well-defined acoustic analysis. CI children as well as HA children in this study tended to overarticulate, which hypothetically can be explained by a lack of auditory feedback and an attempt to compensate it by proprioceptive feedback during articulatory maneuvers.

Impact of anterior single-tooth implants on quality of life, articulation and oromyofunctional behaviour: a pilot study.

The main purpose of this study is to determine the impact (one and a half year after implantation) of a single-tooth implant on articulation and oromyofunctional behaviour. This information is important for dentists, orthodontists or stomatologists who treat professional speakers. Objective (acoustic analysis) as well as subjective (questionnaire, phonetic inventory, phonetic analysis, oromyofunctional assessment of lip and tongue function, blowing, sucking and swallowing) assessment techniques were used to determine the quality of life, articulation and oromyofunctional behaviour. Fourteen subjects who received a single-tooth implant and a control group of nine subjects participated in this study. The mean overall satisfaction of single-implant users was 95%. The subjects who received a single-tooth implant were capable of producing all Dutch vowels and consonants. The phonetic analysis revealed a sigmatism in 57% of the cases. Sigmatisms (stridens sigmatism followed by simplex sigmatism) were the most frequently observed phonetic disorders. There was interobserver agreement about normal lip and tongue functions. Moreover, blowing, sucking and swallowing patterns were normal (concordance value 96%). Detailed analyses 1 or 2 years after implantation of an anterior single-tooth implant revealed normal speech intelligibility and oromyofunctional behaviour. Articulation was characterised by the presence of a persistent phonetic disorder. Further research involving more subjects with an anterior single-tooth implant is needed.

Sensitivity of transient evoked and distortion product otoacoustic emissions to the direct effects of noise on the human cochlea.

Measurement of otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) has been proposed as a sensitive test to reliably assess the effects of noise exposure. The present study in humans was designed to evaluate the sensitivity and applicability of transient evoked OAEs (TEOAEs) and 2f1-f2 distortion product OAEs (DPOAEs) as quantitative indices of the functional integrity of the outer hair cells (OHC) during growth of and recovery from temporary threshold shift (TTS). This was examined in two different groups of volunteers by measuring the per- and post-stimulatory effects of a one hour BBN and an on-site five hour exposure to loud music from a discotheque. The results of both experiments show consistent growth and recovery patterns for both DPOAEs and TEOAEs. For TEOAEs, both the reproducibility scores and signal to noise ratio values for the 4 kHz frequency band exhibited the greatest sensitivity. The DPOAEs, on the other hand, showed the greatest sensitivity between 2 and 5.5 kHz. Thus, both the TEOAEs and DPOAEs have a great potential in the detection of TTS after noise exposure.

Masking effects and tinnitus as explanatory variables in hearing disability.

In cases of substantial auditory handicap, the degree of pure-tone hearing loss or hearing loss for speech is seen as the primary determining factor. Sometimes the presence of tinnitus complaints and disproportionate masking effects of noise on speech reception are seen as aggravating factors. To investigate the relevance of tinnitus and masking effects in the context of hearing disability, four factorial designs with self-perceived hearing disability as the dependent variable were submitted to an analysis of variance. Impact of masking and tinnitus complaints were treated as independent variables with two levels and were each combined with a second independent variable to form a 2 x 2 fixed factor statistical model. This second independent variable was either hearing loss for pure tones (first and second model) or speech reception ability (third and fourth model). Both hearing loss for pure tones and speech reception capability were found to be significant explanatory factors for hearing disability. Impact of masking, if juxtaposed to average pure-tone hearing loss (first model), also came out of the analysis as a significant factor in hearing disability, whereas the tinnitus factor did not reach significance levels. No significant interactions between factors were found. The results support the idea of the differentiating audiogram-based disability estimates by taking noise susceptibility into account. The findings also suggest in an equivocal relation of tinnitus with hearing disability, which prevents it from being a straightforward disability predictor.

Multi-variant analysis of otoacoustic emissions and estimation of hearing thresholds: transient evoked otoacoustic emissions.

Evaluation of cochlear hearing loss by means of transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions is already established in clinical practice. However, accurate prediction of pure-tone thresholds is still questioned and is still regarded as troublesome. Both click- and tone-burst-evoked otoacoustic emissions at several intensity levels were measured and analysed in 157 ears from normally hearing and 432 ears from patients with different degrees of pure sensory hearing loss using the ILO88/92 equipment. Results of otoacoustic emissions (OAE), elicited by clicks and tone-bursts at centre frequencies from 1 to 5 kHz, were analysed using two different statistical methods. Both multivariate discriminant analysis and forward multiple regression analysis were used to determine which OAE variables were most discriminating and best at predicting hearing thresholds. We found that a limited set of variables obtained from both tone-burst and click measurements can accurately predict and categorize hearing loss levels up to a limit of 60 dB HL. We found correct classification scores of pure-tone thresholds between 500 and 4000 Hz up to 100 per cent when using combined click and tone-burst otoacoustic measurements. Prediction of pure-tone thresholds was correct with a maximum estimation error of 10 dB for audiometric octave frequencies between 500 and 4000 Hz. Measurements of multiple tone-bursts OAEs have a significant clinical advantage over the use of clicks alone for clinical applications, and a good classification and prediction of pure-tone thresholds with otoacoustic emissions is possible.

Audiovisual speech reception in noise and self-perceived hearing disability in sensorineural hearing loss.

Multiple regression analyses were performed on a corpus of data from 56 sensorineurally hearing-impaired subjects. In addition to tonal thresholds, the corpus included simple, quantitative self-ratings for disability and results from speech reception tasks in auditory-only, audiovisual, quiet and noisy conditions. The aim was to evaluate to what extent the predictive power of disability formulas based on the audiogram can be enhanced, when measures derived from speech reception tasks are added to tonal thresholds as supplementary predictors. The better-ear speech reception threshold proved to be a strong exclusive predictor: if speech reception thresholds were introduced into the prediction, the contribution of better-ear pure-tone averages became redundant. Speechreading ability always significantly enhanced the prediction's accuracy. Tonal thresholds or speech reception data combined with lipreading ability scores can explain considerable amounts (42 per cent and 54 per cent, respectively) of the variance in disability ratings. The conclusion is that auditory-only, audiogram-based prediction schemes must not be abandoned, but can be tailored to individuals on the basis of realistic audiovisual speech reception performance.

Bilateral threshold frequency weighting in hearing disability predictions.

Hearing disability can be measured by questionnaires, interviews or self-ratings. As these measurement techniques are not always appropriate for direct application in individual cases, particularly in the context of compensation claims, the assessment is sometimes reduced to a surrogate measure derived from audiometric thresholds. No final agreement emerges from correlation studies on hearing disability as to the optimal set of audiometric descriptors. However, a multiple regression equation, describing the relationship between audiometric data and numerically expressed self-ratings of disability, provides a means for predicting disability with relatively good precision, using some index derivable from the audiogram. The aim of the present study was to consolidate or amend current prediction schemes based on tonal audiometric data by investigating the problem of differential bilateral weighting of threshold frequency through multiple regression performed on experimental data coming from an unbiased group of hearing impaired subjects. In addition to tonal thresholds, this corpus included simple, quantitative self-ratings for disability. The sample was considered to be a representative cross-section of adult hearing impaired ENT patients. The results indicate that prevailing bilateral weightings are likely to overestimate the importance of the worse ear. The regression results did not incorporate the usual threshold values and frequency weightings. The outcome nevertheless offered a multiple correlation coefficient that was higher than most correlations reported in the literature between disability ratings and threshold values.