Gemcitabine/cyclophosphamide/5-fluorouracil/folinic acid triplet combination in anthracycline- and taxane-refractory breast cancer patients: a Southern Italy Cooperative Oncology Group phase I/II study.

We sought to define the recommended dose of cyclophosphamide (CTX) for subsequent phase II assessment when combined with fixed doses of gemcitabine (Gemzar; Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN) and 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid in metastatic breast cancer patients previously treated with anthracyclines and taxanes. Patients age 70 or less, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 to 2, were enrolled. Patients received gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2), 5-fluorouracil 425 mg/m(2), folinic acid 100 mg/m(2), and escalating doses of CTX (in 100-mg/m(2) increments), starting at 500 mg/m(2), on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks. Since March 1999, 46 patients, with a median age of 51 years (range, 38 to 74 years), entered the trial in seven cohorts. Cyclophosphamide dose escalation was stopped at 600 mg/m(2) when three of six patients experienced dose-limiting toxicity (one each with grade 3 thrombocytopenia, grade 3 neutropenia, and persistent grade 2 neutropenia), and then continued with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support. The CTX dose of 800 mg/m(2) was proven safe and was chosen for phase II study. Two complete and 15 partial responses provided an overall response rate of 37% (95% confidence interval, 23% to 51%). Gemcitabine/CTX/5-fluorouracil/folinic acid is well tolerated by metastatic breast cancer patients pretreated with anthracyclines/taxanes, up to a CTX dose of 800 mg/m(2). The phase II study is ongoing. Semin Oncol 28 (suppl 10):50-56.

Weekly docetaxel plus gemcitabine or vinorelbine in refractory advanced breast cancer patients: a parallel dose-finding study. Southern Italy Cooperative Oncology Group (SICOG).

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to determine the docetaxel MTD when combined with gemcitabine or vinorelbine in advanced breast cancer patients who had received previous anthracycline-based chemotherapy for advanced disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Advanced breast cancer patients aged between 18 and 70 with ECOG PS 0-2 who had not responded to, or had relapsed after, first-line anthracycline-based chemotherapy, were randomized to receive either gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 or vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 in combination with escalating doses of docetaxel (starting from 30 mg/m2), all on days 1 and 8 every three weeks. Escalation was stopped if > 33% of patients treated at a given dose level showed DLT at the first cycle. RESULTS: A total of 34 patients with locally advanced (8) or metastatic disease (26) were treated, for a total of 94 cycles delivered. Nineteen patients received docetaxel in combination with gemcitabine and 15 with vinorelbine. All patients had been pretreated with anthracyclines, and 24 of 34 had also received weekly dose-dense paclitaxel. A docetaxel dose of 40/m2 proved to be safe when combined on days 1 and 8 with gemcitabine, while a dose of 35 mg/m2 was tolerated in combination with vinorelbine. Overall, nine episodes of DLT, all of them neutropenia, occurred at the first cycle. Considering all 94 cycles, grades 3 or 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 15 (44%), and 7 (20%) patients. Non-hematologic toxicity was mild, except for three cases of grade 2 peripheral neuropathy. All patients were assessed for response on an 'intent-to-treat' basis. Overall, five partial responses were recorded (docetaxel + gemcitabine = 3 and docetaxel + vinorelbine = 2), for a 15% (95% CI: 5%-31%) overall response rate. Only 1 of 24 (4%) patients who had received weekly dose-dense paclitaxel responded to treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The weekly docetaxel administration in combination with either gemcitabine or vinorelbine is a well-tolerated treatment for heavily pretreated advanced breast cancer patients. This approach, although sometimes capable of achieving a major response, does not seem advisable in advanced breast cancer patients refractory to both anthracyclines and paclitaxel.

Long-acting versus short-acting cephalosporins for preoperative prophylaxis in breast surgery: A randomized double-blind trial involving 1,766 patients.

Postoperative infectious complications after breast surgery may result in significant morbidity, psychological trauma, and additional costs. We assessed the efficacy of preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis for surgery in a randomized, double-blind trial of 1,766 patients undergoing breast surgery. From January 1, 1996 to August 31, 1997, all eligible patients were assigned randomly to receive a single dose of ceftriaxone (2 g) or ceftazidime (2 g) given intravenously at the induction of anesthesia, with no further doses. The groups were similar with respect to age, operative procedure, operative time and time to discharge after operation. The patients who received ceftriaxone prophylaxis had 54. 4% fewer overall infections than those who received ceftazidime prophylaxis. Wound infection occurred in 0.45% of the ceftriaxone recipients (2 of 883) and 0.91% of the ceftazidime recipients (8 of 883). This prospective randomized double-blind study showed that the long-acting regimen containing ceftriaxone is more cost-effective than the short-acting ceftazidime in preventing postoperative infections in patients subjected to breast surgery.