ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Observational data suggest hope is associated with the quality of life and survival of people with cancer. This trial examined the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary outcomes of "Pathways," a hope intervention for people in treatment for advanced lung cancer. METHODS: Between 2020 and 2022, we conducted a single-arm trial of Pathways among participants who were 3-12 weeks into systemic treatment. Pathways consisted of two individual sessions delivered during infusions and three phone calls in which participants discussed their values, goals, and goal strategies with a nurse or occupational therapist. Participants completed standardized measures of hope and goal interference pre- and post-intervention. Feasibility was defined as ≥60% of eligible patients enrolling, ≥70% of participants completing three or more sessions, ≥70% of participants completing post-assessments, and mean acceptability ratings ≥7 out of 10 on intervention relevance, helpfulness, and convenience. Linear regression fixed effects models with covariates modeled pre-post changes in complete case analysis and multiple imputation models. RESULTS: Fifty two participants enrolled: female (59.6%), non-Hispanic White (84.6%), rural (75.0%), and with low educational attainment (51.9% high school degree or less). Except for enrollment (54%), feasibility and acceptability markers were surpassed (77% adherence, 77% retention, acceptability ratings ≥8/10). There was moderate improvement in hope and goal interference from pre-to post-intervention (d = 0.51, p < 0.05 for hope; d = -0.70, p < 0.005 for goal interference). CONCLUSIONS: Strong feasibility, acceptability, and patient-reported outcome data suggest Pathways is a promising intervention to increase hope and reduce cancer-related goal interference during advanced lung cancer treatment.
Subject(s)
Hope , Lung Neoplasms , Female , Humans , Male , Educational Status , Linear Models , Lung Neoplasms/therapy , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Quality of LifeABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The standard of care for locally advanced, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive (HER2+) breast cancer includes neoadjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel, carboplatin, trastuzumab, and pertuzumab (TCHP). Many patients do not receive the full course of therapy due to various complications, possibly affecting the potential to achieve a pathologic complete response (pCR). The amount of therapy received is typically measured by relative dose intensity (RDI). This study aimed to evaluate pCR rates in patients receiving optimal and suboptimal RDI TCHP. METHODS: This study was a retrospective chart review of patients treated between 2014 and 2021 at UK HealthCare. Patients included were 18 years of age or older with HER2+ breast cancer and received at least one cycle of neoadjuvant TCHP. The primary objective compared pCR rates in patients receiving ≥ 85% RDI or <85% RDI. Secondary objectives included pCR rates based on clinical stage, age, body mass index, or hormone receptor status; factors leading to discontinuation or delay in treatment; and impact of dose reductions and delays on pCR. RESULTS: A total of 101 patients were included and divided into two cohorts: 54 patients received ≥ 85% RDI and 47 patients received <85% RDI. Patients who received ≥ 85% total RDI had an approximate increase of 17% in pCR rates (59.3% vs 42.6%, p = 0.11). Additionally, 82% of patients experienced a dose delay or adjustment. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who received ≥ 85% RDI had increased pCR rates compared to patients receiving <85% RDI. A larger patient population is needed to formulate definitive conclusions on the impact of RDI and pCR rates.
