Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) ; 19(5): 656-63, 2010 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19832896

ABSTRACT

The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the prognostic factors of patients with renal cell carcinoma. The treatment results such as distant metastasis-free survival and overall survival of 59 previously untreated patients were retrospectively analysed. Median follow-up was 17.5 months (3.8-88.5 months). Overall survival was 22.4 months (3-87 months). Distant metastasis developed in 35 (59%) patients. The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (P=0.022), tumour size (P=0.025) and lymphatic invasion (P<0.0001) were significantly effective prognostic factors for distant metastasis-free survival on multivariate analysis. Related to overall survival, gender (P=0.025), ECOG performance status (P=0.027), nuclear grade (P=0.002), tumour size (P=0.029), T stage (P=0.044), nodal involvement (P=0.003), surgical margin (P=0.046), renal sinus invasion (P<0.0001), perineural growth (P=0.001) and lymphatic invasion (P<0.0001) were significant prognostic factors on univariate analysis. Gender (P=0.008), ECOG performance status (P=0.027), tumour size (P=0.025) and lymphatic invasion (P<0.0001) retained their significance on multivariate analysis. We concluded that the most important prognostic factors for patients with renal cell carcinomas are ECOG performance status, tumour size and lymphatic invasion.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell/therapy , Kidney Neoplasms/therapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/mortality , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/secondary , Epidemiologic Methods , Female , Humans , Kidney Neoplasms/mortality , Kidney Neoplasms/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Prognosis , Severity of Illness Index , Tumor Burden , Turkey
2.
J BUON ; 13(1): 31-6, 2008.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18404783

ABSTRACT

Cerebrovascular disease is common in cancer patients. Some tumors are at high risk for cerebrovascular complications. The development of cerebrovascular disease may be provoked by cancer treatment. No well-planned prospective studies about other causes of thrombosis are available, although various case reports about thrombosis related to chemotherapy have been published. L-asparaginase, cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and methotrexate are anticancer agents which are reported to relate to stroke. The mechanisms by which antineoplastic agents may lead to stroke include endothelium toxicity and abnormalities of coagulation factors. Also, brain hemorrhages that could result from chemotherapy effects on the hemostatic system were reported. Besides, it is difficult to determine whether stroke is caused by chemotherapy or cancer itself. Clinicians deal not only with problems originating from cancer itself, but also with the complications resulting from its treatment. Treatment-induced cerebrovascular disorders affect quality of life and survival in cancer patients. For this reason, cancer treatment should be planned by taking into consideration the possibility of cerebrovascular complications.


Subject(s)
Cerebrovascular Disorders/drug therapy , Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Asparaginase/therapeutic use , Bevacizumab , Cerebrovascular Disorders/diagnosis , Cisplatin/therapeutic use , Fluorouracil/therapeutic use , Humans , Methotrexate/therapeutic use , Tamoxifen/therapeutic use
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...