Long-term Outcomes of a New Surgical Technique for Corneal Remodeling in Corneal Ectasia.

PURPOSE: To analyze the outcomes of a new technique (corneal remodeling) to treat corneal ectasia. METHODS: Sixty-nine cases that underwent corneal remodeling were analyzed. Anesthetic drops were instilled and a femtosecond laser platform was used to perform an 8-mm diameter keratectomy (180°, 270°, or 360°). Once ablation was completed, the edges of the resection were sutured with 8 to 12 interrupted stitches. RESULTS: Three-year follow-up data are presented. The age of the population was 30.83 ± 12.65 years (range: 16 to 48 years). At 36 months postoperatively, 57.2% presented with uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) of 20/100 or worse and 42.8% achieved between 20/80 and 20/40. After performing photorefractive keratectomy in 3 cases, 14.3% presented with UDVA of 20/100 or worse, 57.2% achieved between 20/80 and 20/40, and 28.5% achieved 20/30 or better in 180° arc length keratectomy. Most parameters compared were moderately to statistically significant (P < .05 to < .0000001). CONCLUSIONS: Corneal remodeling is a safe technique that produces corneal flattening, reduction of anterior chamber depth, and decreased optical aberrations. It also offers a possibility to perform complementary refractive procedures. [J Refract Surg. 2019;35(4):261-267.].

A Novel Corneal Remodeling Technique for the Management of Keratoconus.

PURPOSE: To describe a novel technique to reshape the ectatic cornea by means of crescent keratectomy performed with an excimer laser using a mask. METHODS: A crescent-shaped perforation at the base of the mask allowed the laser ablation to be directed only to the intended region, shielding the remaining cornea. This technique was performed in 3 eyes of 3 patients with keratoconus grade 2 to 3. Arcs of 180° and 360° had been performed depending on the severity of the keratoconus. The edges of the crescent were closed by 10-0 nylon interrupted sutures. RESULTS: At 1 year postoperatively, all cases showed improvement in visual acuity, keratometry, and corneal topography. The treatment also reduced optical aberrations and shortened the anterior chamber depth. CONCLUSIONS: Although the preliminary results are promising, there is a need to standardize a nomogram of this technique for treating keratoconus. [J Refract Surg. 2017;33(12):854-856.].

Comparison of laser epithelial keratomileusis with and without the use of mitomycin C.

PURPOSE: To analyze the results of prophylactic intraoperative use of mitomycin C (MMC) in laser epithelial keratomileusis (LASEK). METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 30 LASEK cases that received MMC 0.02% intraoperatively (MMC group) was performed and compared to the results obtained in 28 LASEK cases not receiving MMC (no MMC group). Mitomycin C was placed in contact with the ablation zone for 75 seconds with an imbibed microsponge. Both groups received postoperative fluorometholone for 3 months. Preoperative spherical equivalent refraction was -5.72 +/- 2.82 diopters (D) in the MMC group and -5.81 +/- 2.74 D in the no MMC group. Best spectacle-corrected visual acuity was 0.88 +/- 0.12 in the MMC group and 0.88 +/- 0.13 in the no MMC group. RESULTS: Spherical equivalent refraction at 6 months postoperatively was +0.11 +/- 0.13 D in the MMC group and +0.09 +/- 0.37 D in the no MMC group. Best spectacle-corrected visual acuity was 0.90 +/- 0.13 in the MMC group and 0.88 +/- 0.13 in the no MMC group. Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) > or = 20/40 was obtained in 93.3% of cases in the MMC group and in 89.3% of cases in the no MMC group; UCVA > or = 20/25 was achieved in 76.6% of cases in the MMC group and in 71.4% of cases in the no MMC group. Haze incidence for the MMC group was: trace: 0%, Grades I: 0%, II: 0%, III 0%, IV: 0%, and for the no MMC group: trace: 17.9%, Grades I: 3.6%, II: 0%, III: 0%, IV: 0%. A statistically significant difference (P<.001) was noted in haze intensity between the MMC group and no MMC group. CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic use of intraoperative MMC in LASEK significantly decreases haze incidence.

Laser in situ keratomileusis: ablation on the flap and stromal bed in a primary treatment.

PURPOSE: To analyze outcomes of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) performed on the flap and on the stromal bed at the same time in a primary treatment. SETTING: Instituto de la Visión, Buenos Aires, Argentina. METHODS: Twenty-two cases (13 female, 9 male) were studied retrospectively; the mean age of the patients was 33.15 years +/- 10.44 (SD). Inclusion criteria were low pachymetry or topographic asymmetry. Twenty cases (90.9%) presented with low pachymetry (512.2 +/- 21.40 mum), and 2 cases (9.1%) presented with topographic asymmetry (inferior-superior difference more than 1.5 diopters [D]). Ablation was performed on the flap from the back and on the bed. The flap was made using the Technolas Hansatome microkeratome and the ablation by the Technolas 217z excimer laser (both by Bausch & Lomb). Preoperatively, the spherical equivalent (SE) was -5.61 +/- 1.72 D, the cylinder was -1.78 +/- 1.24 D, and the best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) was 0.77 +/- 0.19. Difficulties and complications of the technique, efficacy and safety index, and aberrations were analyzed. RESULTS: According to the surgical plan and our nomogram, diopters corrected on the flap were -1.73 +/- 1.08 and on the bed were -4.77 +/- 1.89. The mean follow-up was 8.28 +/- 2.19 months. At 6 months, the SE was -0.21 +/- 0.39, vectorial change was 1.69 +/- 0.74, and the BSCVA was 0.77 +/- 0.20. Postoperatively, no eye had an increase in refractive astigmatism. Uncorrected visual acuity was 20/40 or better in all cases (100%) and 20/25 or better in 13 cases (59.1%). Regarding gained and lost lines of BSCVA, 54.5% conserved the lines, 18.2% lost 1 line, 9.1% gained 1 line, and 18.2% gained 2 lines. CONCLUSIONS: Simultaneous ablation on the flap and on the bed in cases of low pachymetry or topographical asymmetry was predictable, effective, and safe.

Intraocular lens power calculation after refractive surgery.

PURPOSE: To analyze the results of phacoemulsification cataract surgery in eyes that had had refractive surgery and to compare the predictability of various methods of intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation. SETTING: Instituto de la Visión, Buenos Aires, Argentina. METHODS: The study involved 7 cases that had phacoemulsification after radial keratotomy or laser in situ keratomileusis. The spherical equivalent (SE) and visual acuity were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively to assess the changes before cataract development. The IOL power calculated with conventional keratometry (CK), adjusted keratometry, the clinical history method (CHM), corneal topography (CT), and the contact lens method (CLM) was compared with the final refractive and keratometric results measured with the BackCalcs (Holladay(R) IOL Consultant Program, Holladay Consulting, Inc.) to assess the accuracy and predictability of each method. RESULTS: The mean SE was -4.82 diopters (D) +/- 5.13 (SD) before phacoemulsification and +0.19 +/- 1.01 D after phacoemulsification, and the mean best corrected visual acuity was 0.39 +/- 0.07 (20/50) and 0.80 +/- 0.06 (20/25), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Post-phacoemulsification refraction in cases with previous refractive surgery appeared to be predictable when the appropriate calculation method was applied. When all the data were available, the CHM provided the best results. Adjusted keratometry and CT seemed to be more accurate than CK and the CLM.

Cirugía refractiva: ficción o realidad? / Refractive surgery: reality or fiction?

La cirugía refractiva es el tratamiento de cualquier vicio de refracción por medio de cirugía. La cirugía refractiva se ha convertido en los últimos años en un procedimiento muy difundido y con aspectos de cierta controversia. La cirugía refractiva ha pasado los límites de la ficción y aparecen ante el médico preguntas que es nuestra intención esclarecer. Nuestro objetivo es explicar el procedimiento quirúrgico y sus resultados. Presentaremos los resultados de este trabajo basado en el tratamiento de más de 3000 casos y su posterior análisis.

Cirugía refractiva: ficción o realidad? / Refractive surgery: reality or fiction?

La cirugía refractiva es el tratamiento de cualquier vicio de refracción por medio de cirugía. La cirugía refractiva se ha convertido en los últimos años en un procedimiento muy difundido y con aspectos de cierta controversia. La cirugía refractiva ha pasado los límites de la ficción y aparecen ante el médico preguntas que es nuestra intención esclarecer. Nuestro objetivo es explicar el procedimiento quirúrgico y sus resultados. Presentaremos los resultados de este trabajo basado en el tratamiento de más de 3000 casos y su posterior análisis.(AU)