Clinical and radiologic outcomes of posterior column extension, pedicle subtraction, and vertebral column resection osteotomies in adult chin on chest deformity: A systematic review.

Background: Chin-on-chest deformity is a rare and severely disabling condition characterized by kyphotic deformity in the cervicothoracic spine. To treat this deformity, various osteotomy techniques were described. Methods: A comprehensive literature search of biomedical databases including MEDLINE (via PubMed), Scopus (via Elsevier), Embase (via Elsevier), and Cochrane Library in English from 1/1/1990 to 3/31/2022 was conducted using a combination of text and Medical Subject Headings (MeSH). Results: The final analysis included 16 studies. All the studies were assigned a level of evidence of four. Except for two articles, all of the articles were non-comparative studies. A total of 288 patients were included in this review. Of the 288 patients, 107 underwent posterior column extension osteotomy (PCEO), 108 underwent pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO), and 33 underwent vertebral column resection osteotomy (VCRO). The most common osteotomy level in fifteen of the studies was C7/T1. The studies included in this review described several techniques for cervical sagittal balance correction. The range of preoperative and postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) scores was 5.5-8.6 to 1.7-4.91, respectively. The range of preoperative and postoperative neck disability index (NDI) was 34.2-65.4 to 22.1-51.3, respectively. The most common complications were upper extremity paresthesia and hand numbness through the C8 dermatome distribution. Conclusions: Corrective osteotomies provide satisfactory results in patients with chin-on-chest deformity; however, the quality of the included studies limits the evidence.

Role of Topical Tranexamic Acid on Blood Loss and Transfusion Requirements in Spinal Fusion for Neuromuscular and Syndromic Scoliosis.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case control study. OBJECTIVES: To determine the role of TXA when used as topical soaked sponges (tTXA) on peri-operative blood loss and changes in hemoglobin following posterior spinal fusion (PSF) for neuromuscular and syndromic scoliosis (NMS). METHODS: A single center review of NMS patients who underwent PSF was conducted. The initial set of patients where no tTXA (control) was used were compared to consecutive NMS patients in whom tTXA was used. In the tTXA group, sponges soaked in 1g TXA in 500 mL normal saline were packed in the wound instead of dry sponges. Estimated blood loss (EBL) was calculated intraoperatively using a standard way. Pre-operative, intra-operative and immediate post-operative variables were collected and compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: 33 patients were included (mean age- 13.5 yrs., BMI- 21, 17 patients in tTXA and 16 patients in control group). Pre-op demographic and radiographic variables were similar between the 2 groups. EBL, EBL per level, EBVL, operative time and number of levels fused were similar in both groups. tTXA group received less intra-operative pRBC transfusion as compared to the control group (150 ± 214 vs 363 ± 186 cc, P = .004). No difference was noted in post-op blood transfusion and drain output for 3 days in both the groups. tTXA group had lesser hospital (5.1 vs 8.9 days) and ICU length of stay (2 vs 4.2 days) and fewer immediate post-operative complications (23.5 vs 52.9%) compared to the control group but not statistically significant (P > .05). CONCLUSION: Administration of tTXA-soaked sponges is an effective and safe method to reduce intraoperative blood transfusion requirements in the correction of spinal deformity in patients with NMS.

The Effects of Preoperative Epidural Steroid Injection on Pseudarthrosis Following Lumbar Fusion: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study is to evaluate the effects of preoperative lumbar epidural steroid injection on the rate of pseudarthrosis following lumbar spine fusion surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Epidural corticosteroids help to reduce nerve root edema and suppress proinflammatory cytokines in patients with radiculopathy. Corticosteroids may inhibit bone formation and reduce bone matrix synthesis rates. Thus, there is concern that corticosteroids may reduce lumbar fusion capability, potentially resulting in increased rates of symptomatic pseudarthrosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified all patients who underwent 1-level or 2-level lumbar fusion surgery between 2018 and 2022. Patients were categorized into one of 3 groups: no preoperative epidural steroid injection (ESI) history (group 0), preoperative ESI within 90 days of surgery (group 1), or most recent ESI >90 days before surgery (group 2). The primary outcome of this study was pseudarthrosis. Binominal regression analyses were performed to determine the relationships between potential risk factors (sex, age, body mass index, smoking history, diabetes status, history of systemic steroid use, preoperative ESI, perioperative intravenous steroid administration, type of surgery, and postoperative ESI within 6 mo) and the development of postoperative pseudarthrosis. RESULTS: A total of 446 patients were included in this study. Of those, 106 patients (23.7%) did not have a preoperative ESI (group 0), 132 patients (29.5%) had an ESI within 90 days of surgery (group 1), and 208 patients (46.6%) had their most recent ESI >90 days before surgery (group 2). The overall incidence of pseudarthrosis following lumbar fusion was 8.7% (39 of 446). Although the incidence of pseudarthrosis following ESI at any time point was higher than in our control cohort (group 0), this difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: This study found no increased risk of postoperative pseudarthrosis in patients who underwent 1-level or 2-level lumbar fusions after preoperative ESI. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Is there an anatomic basis for the different behavior of Lenke types 1AR and 1AL in idiopathic scoliosis? A study on facet joint tropism influence.

INTRODUCTION: AIS type 1 Curves are sub-classified based on the tilt of L4 as 1AR and 1AL. These curves are different w.r.t their curve behavior, progression and level selection. Presently there is no known anatomic etiology for the different behavior. Facet tropism (FT) is defined as the asymmetry between the facet angle of the left and right facet joints. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the correlation between facet tropism in the lumbar segments and occurrence of type 1AR and 1AL curves in AIS patients. METHODS: AIS patients with diagnosis of type 1 AR and 1AL right thoracic AIS curves who underwent posterior instrumented fusion were queried from a single institutions' database. Patients needed to have an MRI of their entire spine to be included. L2-3, L3-4 and L4-5 Facet angles (FA, angle made by the facet line with the mid-sagittal line at respected vertebral level) were calculated. FT was classified as follows: ≤ 5° (minimal), 6- 10° (mild) and ≥ 11° (severe). 1AR and 1AL curves were compared for FA, FT and FT grade at each lumbar segmental levels. RESULTS: One hundred nineteen patients were included (77 females, mean age-13.85 years, mean BMI- 21.63, 73 1AL and 46 1AR). The mean thoracic Cobb was 52.5 ± 9.8°, thoracic kyphosis was 28.12 ± 12° and lumbar lordosis was 53.48 ± 12.6°. L3-4 FA on the right side was more coronally oriented in 1AR curves compared to 1AL curves (37° vs. 31°, p = 0.04). On comparing FT at each level, 1AR curves had a higher FT at L3-4 (1.5° vs. - 2.3°, p = 0.01) and L4-5 levels (5.8° vs. - 0.28°, p < 0.001) compared to 1AL patients. Similarly, 1AR patients had significantly more patients with severe FT at L3-4 (34.8% vs. 13.7%, p = 0.02) and at L4-5 (17.3% vs. 6.8%, p = 0.01) compared to 1ALcurves. CONCLUSION: L3-4 joints are more coronally oriented in 1AR curves compared to 1AL curves. 1AR patients displayed higher FT at L3-4 and L4-5 compared to 1AL patients. 1AR curves also reveal a higher percentage of severe FT at L3-4 and L4-5 levels. This may influence the curve behavior and progression in these two curve types.

Current Trends in Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2 (rhBMP2) Usage for Spinal Fusion Surgery.

(1) Background: Since first approved by the FDA, on-label and off-label usage of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 2 (rhBMP2) for spinal fusion surgeries has become widespread. While many studies have investigated the safety and efficacy of its use, as well as its economic impact, few have looked at the current trends in its on- and off-label use. The goal of this study is to evaluate the current trends of on- and off-label rhBMP2 use for spinal fusion surgery. (2) Methods: A deidentified survey was created and electronically distributed to members of two international spine societies. Surgeons were asked to report their demographic information, surgical experience, and current usage of rhBMP2. They were then presented with five spinal fusion procedures and asked to report if they use rhBMP2 for these indications in their current practice. Responses were stratified between rhBMP2 users vs. non-users and on-label vs. off-label use. Data were analyzed using chi-square with Fisher's exact test for categorical data. (3) Results: A total of 146 respondents completed the survey with a response rate of 20.5%. There was no difference in overall rhBMP2 usage based on specialty, experience, or number of cases per year. Fellowship-trained surgeons and those who practice in the United States were more likely to use rhBMP2. Surgeons who were trained in the Southeast and Midwest regions reported the highest usage rates. rhBMP2 use was more common among fellowship-trained and US surgeons for ALIFs; non-US surgeons for multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusions; and fellowship-trained and orthopedic spine surgeons for lateral lumbar interbody fusions. Non-US surgeons were more likely to use rhBMP2 for off-label indications compared to surgeons from the US. (4) Conclusions: While various demographics of surgeons report different rates of rhBMP2 use, off-label use remains relatively commonplace amongst practicing spine surgeons.

Early Clinical Outcomes of the Prone Transpsoas Lumbar Interbody Fusion Technique.

BACKGROUND: The prone transpsoas (PTP) approach for lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) is a relatively novel technique. Currently, little is known about its associated complications and early patient-reported outcomes. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of LLIF performed via the PTP approach on sagittal radiographic parameters, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), and rates of complications. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of 82 consecutive patients who underwent LLIF via a PTP technique. Lumbar lordosis (LL), segmental lordosis (SL), anterior disc height (ADH), and posterior disc height (PDH) were measured on preoperative, initial postoperative, and 3-month postoperative radiographs. PROMs including the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI); the visual analog scale (VAS); and pain portions of the EQ5D, VAS back, and VAS leg ratings were collected at the preoperative and subsequent postoperative visits. Length of hospital stay and postoperative complications related to the procedure were recorded. RESULTS: Significant improvements were seen at the initial (4.5° ± 8.6°, P < 0.001) and 3-month (4.4° ± 7.2°, P < 0.001) postoperative periods for LL, as well as SL (6.8° ± 4.8°, P < 0.001; 6.7° ± 4.4°, P < 0.001), ADH (8.0 mm ± 3.6, P < 0.001; 7.4 mm ± 3.6, P < 0.001), and PDH (3.3 mm ± 2.4, P < 0.001; 3.1 mm ± 2.5, P < 0.001). Significant improvements were seen at 3 months postoperatively for ODI (P < 0.001), EQ5D pain (P = 0.016), VAS leg (P < 0.001), and VAS back (P < 0.001). The average length of stay was 2.7 ± 4.5 days. The most common complications were ipsilateral thigh pain/numbness (45.1%), ipsilateral hip flexor weakness (39.0%), and contralateral thigh pain/numbness (14.6%). CONCLUSIONS: While early PROMs and correction of sagittal radiographic parameters show promising results for the PTP approach for LLIF, it is not without risks. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: PTP interbody fusion is an emerging technique that allows for simultaneous access to the anterior and posterior columns of the lumbar spine. This early case series demonstrates significant improvement in functional outcomes and lumbar lordosis with a safety profile comparable to other well-established techniques.

Determination of a neurologic safe zone for bicortical S1 pedicle screw placement.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Lumbosacral fixation is commonly used for the management of lumbosacral instability. As the sacrum mainly consists of cancellous bone, bicortical fixation, in which the pedicle screw penetrates the anterior sacral cortex, can help increase the strength of fixation. However, this method carries a risk to the L5 nerves which lie anterior to the sacrum at this level. PURPOSE: The goal of this study is to determine a safe zone for the placement of S1 pedicle screws to decrease the likelihood of L5 nerve injury. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective imaging review. PATIENT SAMPLE: This study evaluated imaging data of patients who underwent lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at our institute between September 1, 2020 and September 1, 2021. OUTCOME MEASURES: T1-weighted axial MRIs were measured at the level of S1 pedicle screw placement. The space medial and lateral to the L5 nerve root on the anterior sacrum were measured and defined as safe zones. Additionally, the nerve width and sacral lengths were measured at this level. METHODS: The distribution of the measurements were evaluated to determine a medial and lateral safe zone, as well as the average nerve width at the level of S1 pedicle screw placement. Correlation analysis was performed to determine a relationship between safe zone sizes and sacral size. RESULTS: A total of 400 MRIs were analyzed. The average medial safe zone measured was 32.8 mm (95% CI: 32.2-33.4) with no nerves lying within 22.3 mm of the midline sacrum. The average lateral safe zone measured was 17.7 mm (95% CI: 17.1-18.2), with no nerves within 5.3 mm of the lateral border of the sacrum. The average nerve root width was 6.2 mm (95% CI: 6.13-6.34). An increased sacral length was associated with a larger medial (p<.001) and lateral (p<.001) safe zone. CONCLUSIONS: Our study revealed lateral and medial safe zones for the placement of S1 pedicle screws to avoid iatrogenic nerve injury in a retrospective cohort of 400 patients. There were no L5 nerve roots found within 22.3 mm of the sacrum's mid-axis or within 5.3 mm of the sacrum's anterolateral border. These defined safe zones can be used during pedicle screw planning and placement to decrease the risk of injury to the L5 nerve root.

Cervical and Lumbar Disc Arthroplasty: A Review of Current Implant Design and Outcomes.

While spinal disc pathology has traditionally been treated using fusion-based procedures, recent interest in motion-preserving disc arthroplasties has grown. Traditional spinal fusion is associated with loss of motion, alteration of native spine kinematics, and increased risks of adjacent segment disease. The motion conferred by disc arthroplasty is believed to combat these complications. While the first implant designs resulted in poor patient outcomes, recent advances in implant design and technology have shown promising radiographic and clinical outcomes when compared with traditional fusion. These results have led to a rapid increase in the utilization of disc arthroplasty, with rates of cervical arthroplasty nearly tripling over the course of 7 years. The purpose of this review was to discuss the evolution of implant design, the current implant designs utilized, and their associated outcomes. Although disc arthroplasty shows significant promise in addressing some of the drawbacks associated with fusion, it is not without its own risks. Osteolysis, implant migration, and the development of heterotopic ossification have all been associated with disc arthroplasty. As interest in these procedures grows, so does the interest in developing improved implant designs aimed at decreasing these adverse outcomes. Though they are still relatively new, cervical and lumbar disc arthroplasty are likely to become foundational methodologies for the treatment of disc pathology.