Effectiveness of home health care in reducing return to hospital: Evidence from a multi-hospital study in the US.

BACKGROUND: Home health care, a commonly used bridge strategy for transitioning from hospital to home-based care, is expected to contribute to readmission avoidance efforts. However, in studies using disease-specific samples, evidence about the effectiveness of home health care in reducing readmissions is mixed. OBJECTIVE: To examine the effectiveness of home health care in reducing return to hospital across a diverse sample of patients discharged home following acute care hospitalization. RESEARCH DESIGN: Secondary analysis of a multi-site dataset from a study of discharge readiness assessment and post-discharge return to hospital, comparing matched samples of patients referred and not referred for home health care at the time of hospital discharge. SETTING: Acute care, Magnet-designated hospitals in the United States PARTICIPANTS: The available sample (n = 18,555) included hospitalized patients discharged from medical-surgical units who were referred (n = 3,579) and not referred (n = 14,976) to home health care. The matched sample included 2767 pairs of home health care and non- home health care patients matched on patient and hospitalization characteristics using exact and Mahalanobis distance matching. METHODS: Unadjusted t-tests and adjusted multinomial logit regression analyses to compare the occurrence of readmissions and Emergency Department/Observation visits within 30 and 60-days post-discharge. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences in readmissions or Emergency Department /Observation visits between home health care and non-home health care patients were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Home health care referral was not associated with lower rates of return to hospital within 30 and 60 days in this US sample matched on patient and clinical condition characteristics. This result raises the question of why home health care services did not produce evidence of lower post-discharge return to hospital rates. Focused attention by home health care programs on strategies to reduce readmissions is needed.

Development of a DNP measurement grid to increase the rigor of doctor of nursing practice students' data collection and analysis methods.

A key component of the DNP project rigor is the collection and analysis of data or measurement. A Steering Committee at the University of Maryland formed to improve the quality of DNP projects established a workgroup to evaluate the current measurement content in four DNP core courses with the goal of establishing DNP project measurement criteria across the curriculum. The steps included: Step 1: Identify QI Measurement Methods and Tools. Identify the essential QI measurement methods and tools recommended by national organizations. Step 2: Create a DNP Measurement Grid. Define main data methods topics with subtopics. Step 3: Map the DNP core courses. Using the DNP Measurement Grid criteria determine the measurement content included in each course and student mastery level. The level of mastery was ranked from introduced (awareness), to reinforced (knowledge), to demonstrated (application). Step 4: Evaluate and Refine the DNP Measurement Grid Criteria. Adjustments were made in the DNP curriculum to include topics and subtopics at the desired mastery level. The rigor of data measurement and analysis will be evaluated in future DNP projects. The workgroup's four-step process provides a path that facilitated improving curriculum measurement content. This process may provide guidance for others undertaking similar work.

Using the consolidated framework for implementation research to evaluate clinical trials: An example from multisite nursing research.

BACKGROUND: The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) is a comprehensive guide for determining the factors that affect successful implementation of complex interventions embedded in real-time clinical practice. PURPOSE: The study aim was to understand implementation constructs in a multi-site translational research study on readiness for hospital discharge that distinguished study sites with low versus high implementation fidelity. METHODS: In this descriptive study, site Principal Investigator interviews (from 8 highest and 8 lowest fidelity sites) were framed with questions from 20 relevant CFIR constructs. Analysis used CFIR rules and rating scale (+2 to -2 per site) and memos created in NVivo 11. FINDINGS: From a bimodal distribution of differences (1.5 and 5), 7 constructs distinguished high and low fidelity sites with ≥5-point difference. DISCUSSION: CFIR provided a determinant framework for identifying elements of a study site's context that impact implementation fidelity and clinical research outcomes.

Post-Hospital Medication Discrepancies at Home: Risk Factor for 90-Day Return to Emergency Department.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the occurrence of medication discrepancies during transitional care home visits and the association with emergency department (ED) visits. Using secondary data analysis, the relationships between in-home medication discrepancies and 30- and 90-day ED utilization were examined. For every in-home medication discrepancy, the odds of being admitted to the ED within 90 days increased by 31%. This brief intervention could add a valuable component to post-hospital transition management.

Using appreciative inquiry during care transitions: an exploratory study.

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a transitional care coaching intervention offered to chronically ill medical patients during the transition from hospital to home. This 2-arm randomized pilot study uses a coaching framework based on appreciative inquiry theory. This article reviews the appreciative inquiry literature and identifies the characteristics of patients who participated in appreciative inquiry coaching. Lessons learned are summarized, and suggestions for future research are offered.

Validation of patient and nurse short forms of the Readiness for Hospital Discharge Scale and their relationship to return to the hospital.

OBJECTIVE: To validate patient and nurse short forms for discharge readiness assessment and their associations with 30-day readmissions and emergency department (ED) visits. DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: A total of 254 adult medical-surgical patients and their discharging nurses from an Eastern US tertiary hospital between May and November, 2011. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective longitudinal design, multinomial logistic regression analysis. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: Nurses and patients independently completed an eight-item Readiness for Hospital Discharge Scale on the day of discharge. Patient characteristics, readmissions, and ED visits were electronically abstracted. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Nurse assessment of low discharge readiness was associated with a six- to nine-fold increase in readmission risk. Patient self-assessment was not associated with readmission; neither was associated with ED visits. CONCLUSIONS: Nurse discharge readiness assessment should be added to existing strategies for identifying readmission risk.

Facilitators and challenges to conducting interdisciplinary research.

BACKGROUND: Complex, interconnected issues challenge the United States health care system and the patients and families it serves. System fragmentation, limited resources, rigid disciplinary boundaries, institutional culture, ineffective communication, and uncertainty surrounding health policy legislation are contributing to suboptimal care delivery and patient outcomes. METHODS: These problems are too complex to be solved by a single discipline. Interdisciplinary research affords the opportunity to examine and solve some of these problems from a more integrative perspective using innovative and rigorous methodological designs. RESULTS: In this paper, we explore lessons learned from exemplars funded by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation's Interdisciplinary Nursing Quality Research Initiative. DISCUSSION: The discussion is framed using an adaptation of the Interdisciplinary Research Model to evaluate improvements in individual health outcomes, health systems, and health policy. Barriers and facilitators to designing, conducting, and translating interdisciplinary research are discussed. Implications for health system and policy changes, including the need to provide funding mechanisms to implement interdisciplinary processes in both research and clinical practice, are provided.

Nurse-pharmacist collaboration on medication reconciliation prevents potential harm.

BACKGROUND: Medication reconciliation can prevent some adverse drug events (ADEs). Our prospective study explored whether an easily replicable nurse-pharmacist led medication reconciliation process could efficiently and inexpensively prevent potential ADEs. METHODS: Nurses at a 1000 bed urban, tertiary care hospital developed the home medication list (HML) through patient interview. If a patient was not able to provide a written HML or recall medications, the nurses reviewed the electronic record along with other sources. The nurses then compared the HML to the patient's active inpatient medications and judged whether the discrepancies were intentional or potentially unintentional. This was repeated at discharge as well. If the prescriber changed the order when contacted about a potential unintentional discrepancy, it was categorized as unintentional and rated on a 1-3 potential harm scale. RESULTS: The study included 563 patients. HML information gathering averaged 29 minutes. Two hundred twenty-five patients (40%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 36%-44%) had at least 1 unintended discrepancy on admission or discharge. One hundred sixty-two of the 225 patients had an unintended discrepancy ranked 2 or 3 on the harm scale. It cost $113.64 to find 1 potentially harmful discrepancy. Based on the 2008 cost of an ADE, preventing 1 discrepancy in every 290 patient encounters would offset the intervention costs. We potentially averted 81 ADEs for every 290 patients. CONCLUSION: Potentially harmful medication discrepancies occurred frequently at both admission and discharge. A nurse-pharmacist collaboration allowed many discrepancies to be reconciled before causing harm. The collaboration was efficient and cost-effective, and the process potentially improves patient safety.

Challenges in posthospital care: nurses as coaches for medication management.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate a transitional care intervention posthospital discharge for chronically ill medical patients managing complex medication regimens. This descriptive pilot study tested 2 interventions: telephone follow-up and a home visit. Registered nurses delivered the interventions with consulting pharmacist support. Findings included 62% more medication discrepancies discovered during home visit than detected by telephone interview. This brief intervention identified significant knowledge gaps in self-management of discharge medications in the inner city population.