In-office Hysteroscopic Treatment of Herlyn-Werner-Wunderlich Syndrome: A Case Series.

Herlyn-Werner-Wunderlich syndrome (HWWs) is a rare congenital malformation of the female urogenital track characterized by a triad consisting of didelphys uterus, obstructed hemivagina, and ipsilateral renal agenesis. We report 5 consecutive cases of patients diagnosed with HWWs treated in our center. Imaging studies with 2-dimensional/3-dimensional ultrasound and abdominopelvic magnetic resonance imaging were obtained to confirm the diagnosis. The treatment consisted of a 1-step surgical in-office hysteroscopic incision of the vaginal septum using 5 Fr hysteroscopic bipolar electrodes. At the follow-up visit, between 1 and 2 months after the initial procedure, the patients underwent a diagnostic vaginoscopy with excision of exceeding vaginal tissue if needed, performed with a vaginal hysteroscopic approach. In-office hysteroscopic treatment of patients diagnosed with HWWs is a safe and effective, minimally invasive treatment modality that provides symptomatic relief and preserves fertility, avoiding the cost and risks of the use of general anesthesia in an operating room setting. We recommend shifting the management of this challenging condition to the office setting.

Office hysteroscopy in an in vitro fertilization program.

OBJECTIVE: In the present paper we evaluate the incidence of intrauterine pathologies in a population undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment. Moreover, we compare the IVF outcome between patients with normal and abnormal uterine findings to determine if office hysteroscopy (OH) is of any clinical significance. METHODS: The hysteroscopic findings in 866 consecutive patients were analyzed. The study group included 555 patients at the first IVF attempt and 311 patients with two or more failed IVF cycles. RESULTS: All hysteroscopic parameters were considered normal in 514 cases (59.4%); in 352 cases (40.6%) various pathological conditions were found. Patients were divided into two groups according to the hysteroscopic findings. The implantation and pregnancy rates were similar between the groups. Comparing the clinical outcomes in patients with repeated IVF failure who had hysteroscopy with no pathology and with pathology, we did not find any statistical differences. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that hysteroscopy as a routine infertility examination should be performed in all patients, owing to the elevated incidence of hysteroscopic pathological findings (59.4%); hysteroscopy also seems to be the best way to repair the uterine cavity when pathological conditions are present. However, performing OH before IVF-embryo transfer is of no significant value in improving pregnancy outcomes.