Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Arch Ital Urol Androl ; 86(3): 161-3, 2014 Sep 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25308576

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Penile implant patients are required to remain in the hospital after the operation for monitoring, antibiotic and analgesia administration. Cost containment, however, has resulted in the increased use of ambulatory surgery settings for many surgical procedures. Few studies have studied the feasibility of performing penile prosthesis insertion in an outpatient setting. The results are controversial and nowadays, in the most of centers that deal with prosthetic surgery, patients are still hospitalized. AIM: The aim of our investigation was to compare the feasibility of the performance as well as the complication profiles of penile implant surgery performed in an in-patient and an outpatient setting at a single center by a single surgeon. METHODS: From January 2009 to June 2014, 50 patients of the same uro-andrological unit underwent penile prosthesis implantation performed by a single surgeon (N.M.). Twenty implantations were performed in an ambulatory day surgery setting. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Effectiveness and costs of outpatient setting versus the in-patient setting of the penile prosthesis surgery. RESULTS: There were some differences between the two groups in the intra-operative parameters, such as, operating time. Time lost from work was similar in both groups approximating 14 days. The mean number of analgesic pills ingested by the patients post-operatively was similar in both groups, averaging just under 25 pills per patient. There weren't post-operative complications in the outpatient group. Cost were 17% less in outpatient clinic. CONCLUSIONS: The outpatient setting for this surgery is safe and effective even in patients with comorbidities or in case of secondary procedures. Costs are reduced by 17%.

2.
Urol Int ; 79(4): 364-6, 2007.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18025858

ABSTRACT

Retroperitoneal abscesses are very uncommon clinical conditions. The characteristically vague symptomatology of retroperitoneal abscess and the inherent difficulty of identifying retroperitoneal disease by physical examination contributed to these dismal therapeutic outcomes. We present an unusual case of lethal retroperitoneal abscess, caused by Citrobacter diversus(koseri), treated with surgical drainage. Citrobacter species have rarely been involved in deep tissue infection and there is no reported case of lethal retroperitoneal abscess caused by C. koseri. This case is the only reported case of C. koseri as the sole pathogen associated with a lethal retroperitoneal abscess in immunocompetent patient. The case is also notable because it confirms the recent bacterial resistance to beta-lactam antibiotics and to other antimicrobial agents, like chloramphenicol or cotrimoxazol.


Subject(s)
Abscess/microbiology , Citrobacter koseri/isolation & purification , Enterobacteriaceae Infections/diagnosis , Abscess/therapy , Aged , Citrobacter koseri/drug effects , Combined Modality Therapy , Disease Progression , Enterobacteriaceae Infections/therapy , Fatal Outcome , Humans , Male , Rare Diseases , Retroperitoneal Space , Severity of Illness Index
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...