Early stage detection of conduit artery endothelial dysfunction in patients with type 1 diabetes.

Flow-mediated dilatation evaluation using hand skin heating may possibly be more accurate than post-ischaemic hyperaemia to detect conduit artery endothelial dysfunction in type 1 diabetes. We measured in 24 type 1 diabetic patients (n=16 without microangiopathy) and 24 healthy matched subjects radial artery diameter (echotracking), blood flow and mean wall shear stress during heating and post-ischaemic hyperaemia. Compared with controls, flow-mediated dilatation was lower in diabetic patients during post-ischaemic hyperaemia and heating. However, in the subgroup of uncomplicated patients, a decreased flow-mediated dilatation was only apparent during heating (17.1+/-1.6% vs. 24.3+/-0.7%, p<0.05) but not during post-ischaemic hyperaemia (10.1+/-1.1% vs. 10.5+/-0.6%, NS). This was confirmed by the lower slope of the diameter-mean wall shear stress relationship in these patients in the absence of modification in endothelium-independent dilatation. We conclude that hand skin heating permits the early detection of conduit artery endothelial dysfunction in type 1 diabetic patients with normal response to post-ischaemic hyperaemia. This procedure could be useful to investigate the prognostic role of vascular dysfunction and the impact of vasculoprotective treatments in this patient population.

Influence of vascular dimension on gender difference in flow-dependent dilatation of peripheral conduit arteries.

To assess the influence of initial diameter on the gender difference in flow-dependent dilatation (FDD) of the conduit artery, we measured radial artery internal diameter (echotracking), flow (Doppler) and total blood viscosity in 24 healthy (25 +/- 0.8 yr) men and women during reactive hyperemia (RH) and during a gradual hand skin heating (SH). At baseline, mean diameter (men, 2.76 +/- 0.09 vs. women, 2.32 +/- 0.07 mm, P < 0.05), flow (men, 21 +/- 4 vs. women, 10 +/- 1 ml/min, P < 0.05), and blood viscosity (men, 4.13 +/- 0.07 vs. women, 3.92 +/- 0.13 cP, P < 0.05) were higher in men but mean shear stress (MSS) was not different between groups. During RH, the percent increase in diameter was lower in men (men, 9 +/- 1 vs. women, 13 +/- 1%, P < 0.05). This difference was suppressed after correction for baseline diameter. During SH, the increase in diameter with flow was higher in women (P < 0.01). However, the increase in MSS was higher in women because of their smaller diameter at each level of flow (P < 0.01) and there was no difference between groups for the increase in diameter at each level of MSS. These results demonstrate in a direct manner that initial diameter influences the magnitude of FDD of conduit arteries in humans by modifying the value of the arterial wall shear stress at each level of flow and support the interest of the heating method in presence of heterogeneous groups.