Resting-state functional connectivity correlates of anxiety co-morbidity in major depressive disorder.

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is frequently co-morbid with anxiety disorders. The co-morbid state has poorer functional outcomes and greater resistance to first line treatments, highlighting the need for novel treatment targets. This systematic review examined differences in resting-state brain connectivity associated with anxiety comorbidity in young- and middle-aged adults with MDD, with the aim of identifying novel targets for neuromodulation treatments, as these treatments are thought to work partly by altering dysfunctional connectivity pathways. Twenty-one studies met inclusion criteria, including a total of 1292 people with MDD. Only two studies included people with MDD and formally diagnosed co-morbid anxiety disorders; the remainder included people with MDD with dimensional anxiety measurement. The quality of most studies was judged as fair. Results were heterogeneous, partly due to a focus on a small set of connectivity relationships within individual studies. There was evidence for dysconnectivity between the amygdala and other brain networks in co-morbid anxiety, and an indication that abnormalities of default mode network connectivity may play an underappreciated role in this condition.

Easy to interpret coordinate based meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies: Analysis of brain coordinates (ABC).

BACKGROUND: Functional MRI and voxel-based morphometry are important in neuroscience. They are technically challenging with no globally optimal analysis method, and the multiple approaches have been shown to produce different results. It is useful to be able to meta-analyse results from such studies that tested a similar hypothesis potentially using different analysis methods. The aim is to identify replicable results and infer hypothesis specific effects. Coordinate based meta-analysis (CBMA) offers this, but the multiple algorithms can produce different results, making interpretation conditional on the algorithm. NEW METHOD: Here a new model based CBMA algorithm, Analysis of Brain Coordinates (ABC), is presented. ABC aims to be simple to understand by avoiding empirical elements where possible and by using a simple to interpret statistical threshold, which relates to the primary aim of detecting replicable effects. RESULTS: ABC is compared to both the most used and the most recently developed CBMA algorithms, by reproducing a published meta-analysis of localised grey matter changes in schizophrenia. There are some differences in results and the type of data that can be analysed, which are related to the algorithm specifics. COMPARISON TO OTHER METHODS: Compared to other algorithms ABC eliminates empirical elements where possible and uses a simple to interpret statistical threshold. CONCLUSIONS: There may be no optimal way to meta-analyse neuroimaging studies using CBMA. However, by eliminating some empirical elements and relating the statistical threshold directly to the aim of finding replicable effects, ABC makes the impact of the algorithm on any conclusion easier to understand.

Coordinate based meta-analysis of networks in neuroimaging studies.

Meta-analysis of summary results from published neuroimaging studies independently testing a common hypothesis is performed using coordinate based meta-analysis (CBMA), which tests for consistent activation (in the case of functional MRI studies) of the same anatomical regions. Using just the reported coordinates it is also possible to meta-analyse coactivated regions to reveal a network-like structure of coordinate clusters (network nodes) distributed at the coactivated locations and a measure of the coactivation strength (network edges), which is determined by the presence/absence of reported activation. Here a new coordinate-based method to estimate a network of coactivations is detailed, which utilises the Z score accompanying each reported. Coordinate based meta-analysis of networks (CBMAN) assumes that if the activation pattern reported by independent studies is truly consistent, then the relative magnitude of these Z scores might also be consistent. It is hypothesised that this is detectable as Z score covariance between coactivated regions provided the within study variances are small. Advantages of using the Z scores instead of coordinates to measure coactivation strength are that censoring by the significance thresholds can be considered, and that using a continuous measure rather than a dichotomous one can increase statistical power. CBMAN uses maximum likelihood estimation to fit multivariate normal distributions to the standardised Z scores, and the covariances are considered as edges of a network of coactivated clusters (nodes). Here it is validated by numerical simulation and demonstrated on real data used previously to demonstrate CBMA. Software to perform CBMAN is freely available.

Coordinate based random effect size meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies.

Low power in neuroimaging studies can make them difficult to interpret, and Coordinate based meta-analysis (CBMA) may go some way to mitigating this issue. CBMA has been used in many analyses to detect where published functional MRI or voxel-based morphometry studies testing similar hypotheses report significant summary results (coordinates) consistently. Only the reported coordinates and possibly t statistics are analysed, and statistical significance of clusters is determined by coordinate density. Here a method of performing coordinate based random effect size meta-analysis and meta-regression is introduced. The algorithm (ClusterZ) analyses both coordinates and reported t statistic or Z score, standardised by the number of subjects. Statistical significance is determined not by coordinate density, but by a random effects meta-analyses of reported effects performed cluster-wise using standard statistical methods and taking account of censoring inherent in the published summary results. Type 1 error control is achieved using the false cluster discovery rate (FCDR), which is based on the false discovery rate. This controls both the family wise error rate under the null hypothesis that coordinates are randomly drawn from a standard stereotaxic space, and the proportion of significant clusters that are expected under the null. Such control is necessary to avoid propagating and even amplifying the very issues motivating the meta-analysis in the first place. ClusterZ is demonstrated on both numerically simulated data and on real data from reports of grey matter loss in multiple sclerosis (MS) and syndromes suggestive of MS, and of painful stimulus in healthy controls. The software implementation is available to download and use freely.