Therapeutic impact of 18F-FDG PET/CT for initial staging in patients with clinical stage I and IIA, HER2-positive, or triple-negative breast cancer.

PURPOSE: While 18F-FDG PET/CT (FDG-PET/CT) is consensual for clinical stage ≥ IIB breast cancers (BC), its benefit for stage I or IIA HER2+ or triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients lacks sufficient evidence. We reported a single-institution, retrospective study evaluating FDG-PET/CT impact on patient management and staging for stage I or IIA HER2+ or Triple-Negative BC. METHODS: Patients who underwent FDG-PET/CT staging before any treatment between January 2015 and December 2020 at Oscar Lambret Center were included. EXCLUSIONS: patients with symptoms or conventional imaging suggestive of metastatic dissemination, or with prior malignancies. Initial stage was determined from mammography, breast ultrasound, breast MRI, and clinical examination. Staging and therapeutic impact based on FDG-PET/CT findings collected, including intra- (modification of dose/site/strategy in a type of management previously indicated) and inter-modality (modification of planned treatment strategy) changes. RESULTS: The cohort included 287 female patients with clinical stage I or IIA, HER2+ , or TNBC. Therapeutic impact observed for 18% of patients (n = 52), with 2% (n = 7) undergoing inter-modality change with omission of planned surgery. The impact on patient management was higher for stage IIA patients (20%, 47/237) than for stage I patients (10%, 5/50). Among stage IIA disease, changes in management were more important for T2N0 patients (22%, 44/205) than for T1N1 patients (9%, 3/32). While not statistically significant, trends suggest usefulness of FDG-PET/CT for T2N0 patients. CONCLUSION: Considering substantial therapeutic implications, our study suggests the usefulness of FDG-PET/CT for patients with stage IIA, HER2-positive, or Triple-Negative BC with tumor size > 2 cm (T2N0).

Phase II study of 131 I-metaiodobenzylguanidine with 5 days of topotecan for refractory or relapsed neuroblastoma: Results of the French study MIITOP.

PURPOSE: We report the results of the French multicentric phase II study MIITOP (NCT00960739), which evaluated tandem infusions of 131 I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (mIBG) and topotecan in children with relapsed/refractory metastatic neuroblastoma (NBL). METHODS: Patients received 131 I-mIBG on day 1, with intravenous topotecan daily on days 1-5. A second activity of 131 I-mIBG was given on day 21 to deliver a whole-body radiation dose of 4 Gy, combined with a second course of topotecan on days 21-25. Peripheral blood stem cells were infused on day 31. RESULTS: Thirty patients were enrolled from November 2008 to June 2015. Median age at diagnosis was 5.5 years (2-20). Twenty-one had very high-risk NBL (VHR-NBL), that is, stage 4 NBL at diagnosis or at relapse, with insufficient response (i.e., less than a partial response of metastases and more than three mIBG spots) after induction chemotherapy; nine had progressive metastatic relapse. Median Curie score at inclusion was 6 (1-26). Median number of prior lines of treatment was 3 (1-7). Objective response rate was 13% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 4-31) for the whole population, 19% for VHR-NBL, and 0% for progressive relapses. Immediate tolerance was good, with nonhematologic toxicity limited to grade-2 nausea/vomiting in eight patients. Two-year event-free survival was 17% (95% CI: 6-32). Among the 16 patients with VHR-NBL who had not received prior myeloablative busulfan-melphalan consolidation, 13 had at least stable disease after MIITOP; 11 subsequently received busulfan-melphalan; four of them were alive (median follow-up: 7 years). CONCLUSION: MIITOP showed acceptable tolerability in this heavily pretreated population and encouraging survival rates in VHR-NBL when followed by busulfan-melphalan.

Feasibility of Busulfan Melphalan and Stem Cell Rescue After 131I-MIBG and Topotecan Therapy for Refractory or Relapsed Metastatic Neuroblastoma: The French Experience.

High-risk neuroblastoma is characterized by poor long-term survival, especially for very high-risk (VHR) patients (poor response of metastases after induction therapy). The benefits of a tandem high-dose therapy and hematologic stem cell reinfusion (HSCR) have been shown in these patients. Further dose escalation will be limited by toxicity. It is thus important to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of the addition of new agents such as I-MIBG (131Iode metaiodobenzylguanidine) to be combined with high-dose therapy in the consolidation phase. We report the feasibility of busulfan/melphalan (BuMel) after I-MIBG therapy with HSCR in patients with refractory or relapsed metastatic neuroblastoma. From November 2008 to March 2015, 9 patients received BuMel after I-MIBG therapy and topotecan. The main toxicity was digestive with only 1 patient developing grade 4 sinusoidal obstructive syndrome. Seven patients are alive at a median follow-up of 25 months. Among them, 2 are in ongoing complete remission and 1 in ongoing stable disease. These results suggest that BuMel with HSCR can be administered safely 2 months after I-MIBG therapy associated with topotecan for VHR patients. This strategy will be compared with tandem high-dose chemotherapy (thiotepa and busulfan-melphalan), followed by HSCR in the upcoming SIOPEN VHR Neuroblastoma Protocol.

HIGH-DOSE 131I-MIBG THERAPIES IN CHILDREN: FEASIBILITY, PATIENT DOSIMETRY AND RADIATION EXPOSURE TO WORKERS AND FAMILY CAREGIVERS.

The objective of the present multicentric phase II study (MIITOP) was to determine the response rate, survival and toxicity of tandem infusions of 131I-meta-iodobenzylguanidine (mIBG) and topotecan in children with relapsed/refractory neuroblastoma. High-dose 131I-mIBG therapy programme requires a deal of planning, availability of hospital resources and the commitment of individuals with training and expertise in multiple disciplines. Here in the present study, procedures and the results of patient's dosimetry, as well as family and worker's exposures, were reported for the patients treated in Lille. A total of 15 children were treated with 131I-mIBG between 2009 and 2011 according to the MIITOP protocol. High activity of 131I-mIBG (444 MBq kg-1) was administered on Day 0. In vivo dosimetry was used to calculate a second activity, to be given on Day 21, to obtain a total whole body absorbed dose of 4 Gy. Family and worker's exposures were performed too. The injected activity by treatment was from 703 to 11470 MBq. Total whole body absorbed dose by patient ranged from 2.74 to 5.2 Gy. Concerning relatives, whole body exposure ranged from 0.018 to 2.8 mSv. The mean whole body exposure of the radiopharmacist was 4.4 nSv MBq-1, and the mean exposure of fingers ranged from 0.18 to 0.24 µSv MBq-1 according to each finger. The mean whole body exposure was 33.6 and 20.2 µSv d-1 per person, for night nurses and day nurses, respectively. Exposure of doctors was less than 5 µSv d-1. Under strict radiation protection precautions, this study shows the feasibility of high-activity 131I-mIBG therapy in France.