Trapeziometacarpal (TMC) arthroplasty under Wide Awake Local Anesthesia with No Tourniquet (WALANT) versus Local Anesthesia with peripheral nerve blocks (LAPNV): Perioperative pain and early functional results in 30 patients.

We hypothesized that WALANT would provide similar perioperative analgesic comfort compared to local anesthesia with peripheral nerve blocks (LAPNV). We analyzed whether the patient's active participation during surgery would improve its early functional results. We did a retrospective, single study in an outpatient surgery unit, comparing two types of surgery: trapeziometacarpal arthroplasty (TMCA) under LAPNV and TMCA under WALANT. Fifteen patients were included per group. Pain levels were determined during anesthesia induction, intraoperatively, postoperatively, at rest and during activity at the last follow-up visit. The overall satisfaction with the surgery and time to resume daily activities and work were documented. The statistical analysis was performed on SAS software with an ANOVA. The significance threshold was set at 0.05. The groups were comparable on age, sex, dominant side, and operated side. No patients were lost to follow-up. The mean follow-up was 4 months (2.3-11). The QuickDASH score was 4.93 for TMCA under WALANT vs. 13.47 for TMCA under LAPNV (p = 0.01). There was no loosening, dislocation, or major complication. Our study showed that TMCA performed with WALANT yields similar results to the same procedure with LAPNV for perioperative pain relief without additional complications. Functional scores seem to be slightly improved with WALANT compared to LAPNV, but these results should be confirmed with longer follow up.

Correction to: Patient dose reference levels in surgery: a multicenter study.

The original version of this article, published on 01 August 2018, unfortunately contained two mistakes.

Patient dose reference levels in surgery: a multicenter study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) in surgery for the most frequent procedures as required by the European Directive 2013/59/Euratom. METHODS: A survey was conducted in six centers. Eight orthopedic, urology and gastrointestinal surgical procedures were analyzed. Kerma area product (KAP) and fluoroscopy time (FT) were recorded for 50 patients (except for elbow: 30 patients) per procedure and per center from September 2016 to September 2017. DRLs were calculated as the 3rd quartiles of the distributions. For shoulder surgery, DRLs were defined according to the complexity of the procedure. For hand/wrist and foot/ankle surgery, DRLs were defined according to the technology (conventional C-arm vs. mini-C-arm). RESULTS: Results of 1870 procedures were retrieved. DRLs were calculated for the two dosimetric indicators and the eight procedures. DRLs were 2130 mGy.cm2 and 1.4 min for proximal femoral intramedullary nail, 1185 mGy.cm2 and 0.9 min for laparoscopic cholecystectomy and 2195 mGy.cm2 and 1.0 min for double-J (pigtail) ureteral catheter insertion. For shoulder surgery, KAP and FT were significantly higher (p < 0.05) for intramedullary procedures compared to extramedullary procedures. For hand/wrist and foot/ankle surgery, the KAPs were significantly higher (p < 0.05) with conventional C-arm compared to mini-C-arm, but FTs were not significantly different (p: not significant). CONCLUSION: This study reports DRLs in surgery based on a multicentric survey. KEY POINTS: • Delivered dose in surgery depends on procedure, practice and patient. • Diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) are proposed for eight surgical procedures. • DRLs are useful to benchmark practices and optimize protocols.

Bilateral simultaneous endoscopic carpal tunnel release: Mean time to resume activities of daily living and return to work.

The purpose of this study was to determine the time needed to return to personal and professional activities after bilateral simultaneous endoscopic carpal tunnel release. During a retrospective, single-center study, we included a cohort of 30 patients (60 wrists). Patients were evaluated clinically (pain, paresthesia) and functionally (QuickDASH score) pre- and postoperatively. At the last follow-up, patients completed a questionnaire regarding the time needed to resume personal activities using the ADL scale (feeding, personal hygiene and dressing) and return to work. We also evaluated procedure satisfaction and willingness to undergo the surgery again. The average patient age was 60.5 years (range 39-86). At the last follow-up, average time to resume personal activities was 2.2 days (0-14) for feeding, 4.4 days (0-15) for personal hygiene and 3.9 days (0-14) for dressing. Average time to return to recreational activities was 11.7 days (1-60). Average time to return to work was 36.6 days (15-60). Overall, 97% of patients were satisfied or very satisfied with the outcome. All patients would have the bilateral simultaneous surgery again. Bilateral simultaneous endoscopic carpal tunnel release is rarely performed. For mild conditions, contralateral symptom improvement is common after unilateral surgery. Bilateral simultaneous endoscopic carpal tunnel release appears to be disabling right after surgery, but clinical and functional scores are similar after the third postoperative day. These data can be used for patient education and decision making when considering surgery bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome. Bilateral simultaneous endoscopic carpal tunnel release is a feasible and safe procedure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, case series.

[Surgical exposures for distal radius fractures]. / Les voies d'abord des fractures du radius distal : une mise au point.

This is a review of the various approaches that can be used for open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of distal radius fractures. The main dissection steps are exposed and the specific indications for each approach are described. The anterior approach is discussed extensively as it is now the gold standard for ORIF of distal radius fractures. The lateral and posterior approaches are also described as they are sometimes needed for complex fractures.

Periprosthetic fracture in the elderly with anatomic modular cementless hemiarthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The use of an anatomic cementless stem in hemiarthroplasties for femoral intracapsular proximal fracture has been debated, notably because of bone weakness and/or morphological defects related to osteoporosis. We therefore conducted a retrospective study in subjects over 75 years of age who had received an anatomic stem partially coated with hydroxyapatite. The objectives were to determine: 1) the incidence of periprosthetic fractures (PPFs) and, 2) the influence of anatomic factors, including the Cortical Bone Ratio (CBR) (the relation between the endosteal and external diameter of the femoral diaphysis 10cm below the lesser trochanter). HYPOTHESIS: The risk of PPF with an anatomic cementless implant is greater than with cemented stems. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 233 patients followed up for 5 years after their surgery. The stem used was an anatomic stem with a modular neck partially coated with hydroxyapatite. The risk factors examined were age, gender, history of osteoporotic fractures, diverse causes of secondary osteoporosis, and proximal bone stock according to various referenced radiological indices such as the CBR. RESULTS: Twenty patients (15%) were lost to follow-up, 74 had died (32%) but did not undergo revision for PPF, 15 of the 139 survivors at the last follow-up (10.8%) had had a PPF, five (3.6%; four females, one male) were early fractures (≤2 months after implantation), ten (7.2%; two females, eight males) were late fractures (>2 months). Male gender was protective for PPF occurrence (RR=0.129; 95%CI (0.04-0.39); P=0.0003), whereas secondary factors of osteoporosis (RR=2.035; 95%CI (1.11-3.72); P=0.0211), and CBR>0.49 (RR=227.42; 95%CI (1.072-48,226.76); P=0.0471) were found as risk factors of PPF. DISCUSSION: The PPF rate was greater than that related to cemented stems, requiring that morphological and clinical factors of bone weakness (collected with the patient history and related to osteoporosis) be taken into account. A CBR>0.49 requires caution on the use of this type of stem. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4. Retrospective study.

Clinical results of endoscopic treatment without repair for partial thickness gluteal tears.

INTRODUCTION: Various surgical treatments have been proposed for greater trochanteric pain syndrome (GTPS) related to gluteal tendinopathy with partial thickness tears. The clinical results of endoscopic debridement without repair of these gluteal tears are not well known. The objectives of this study were to determine if this procedure leads to: (1) reduction of pain, (2) functional improvement, (3) patient satisfaction (on scale of 0 to 10). HYPOTHESIS: Endoscopic treatment without tendon repair provides short-term pain relief in patients with GTPS due to partial thickness gluteal tears. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Seventeen patients (16 women, 1 man) with GTPS due to partial thickness gluteal tears that was present for at least 6 months and was refractory to conservative treatment were included in the analysis. The average age at the time of the procedure was 53.5years (17-71). Pain was evaluated with a visual analogue scale (VAS). Functional outcomes were defined using the Harris Hip Score and the UCLA activity score. Satisfaction was evaluated using a VAS and Odom's criteria. RESULTS: The average follow-up was 37.6months (12-48). The average preoperative and follow-up values were respectively: (1) Pain: 7.2±1.1 (5-9) versus 3.3±1.9 (1-7) (P<0.001), (2) Harris score: 53.5±8.4 (36-68) versus 79.8±14.7 (45-96) (P<0.001). Seven patients (41.2%) were able to resume sports activities. The average satisfaction score for the surgery was 6.2±2.4 (0-9) at follow-up. Five patients had a poor outcome at the review: four still had pain and one had recurrence of the lateral snapping hip. CONCLUSION: Endoscopic treatment without repair of partial thickness gluteal tears is a treatment option with modest clinical results for GTPS patients refractory to conservative treatment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, retrospective study.

Clinical evaluation of hip joint rotation range of motion in adults.

INTRODUCTION: Data on hip joint rotation range of motion (ROM) are rare; the methods of measurement vary and reproducibility has not been evaluated, in particular in relation to the subject's position (prone or supine, seated). HYPOTHESIS: Hip joint rotation ROM is symmetrical, and ROM is not modified by the patient's position when data is obtained. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This series included 120 adults between 20 and 60 years old (71 women, 49 men), who had no hip, spine or lower extremity disorders. External (ER) and internal (IR) rotation ROM was obtained using a photographic method by two observers. Measurements were obtained with the patient in three positions: the dorsal decubitus (supine) (P1), and ventral decubitus (prone) (P2) with the hip in extension and seated with the hip in flexion (P3). RESULTS: Hip rotation ROM was P1: 68.1° (ER=38.5°; IR=29.6°); P2: 77.1°(ER=41.8°; IR=35.2°); P3: 78.5° (ER=78.5°; IR=37.9°) with no significant difference among the three positions. Interobserver reproducibility was satisfactory (concordance correlation coefficient (ccc) 0.7) and was comparable in the three positions with a ccc of 0.7072 (P1), 0.7426 (P2) and 0.7332 (P3), respectively. Hip rotation ROM balance was ER predominant in 47.5%, neutral in 39.5% and IR predominant in 13%. Hip rotation ROM balance was symmetric in both hips in 73 subjects (61%). Hip rotation ROM was reduced with age (P<0.0001), and was 4.7° less in men (P=0.0078), and in overweight subjects (P<0.0006). DISCUSSION: Our values are probably lower than those in the literature because of the difference in study population. In our series, age, BMI and gender seemed to be determining factors. Hip rotation ROM balance is usually ER predominant or neutral. Hip rotation ROM can be measured in the three positions with no significant difference, with satisfactory interobserver reproducibility for each. TYPE OF STUDY: Diagnostic prospective study: level III.

[Rapid destructive arthropathy of the shoulder]. / L'arthropathie destructrice rapide de l'épaule.

Within the general context of rapid destruction of the humeral head, destructive arthropathy of the shoulder, described here in six cases, is a diagnosis of elimination. Being neither infectious inflammatory, microcrystalline, nor neurological, this curious variety of degenerative pathology of the shoulder involves the following: 1) a particular group of sufferers: women aged 65 to 81 years; 2) prior signs, at least radiological, of deterioration in the rotator cuff; 3) rapid erosive osteolysis of the head of the humerus reducing its radiological area by 25 per cent in less than six months; 4) early narrowing of the scapulo-humeral joint space (Ist to 9th month); 5) transient appearance of calcium debris in the area of the joint; 6) a synovial effusion in some cases, often bloody. The destruction phase is associated with pain lasting from two months to two years. However at the stage of stable sequelae, pain is moderate or minimal. Differential diagnosis with destructive arthropathy due to articular chondrocalcinosis and necrosis of the head of the humerus is particularly discussed. The cause of rapid destruction is unknown. It may be multifactorial: advanced age (constant), osteoporosis, fragility of articular cartilage as evidenced by multiple localizations of osteoarthrosis (4 cases out of 6), enzymes in the bloody effusion, trauma (3 cases out of 7), and intra-articular injections of corticosteroid derivatives, in particular fluorinated (3 cases out of 7) may possibly play a role.

[Usual values of haptoglobin, protein-bound sialic acid and blood sedimentation in a population of the Cherbourg region]. / Valeurs usuelles de l'haptoglobine, de l'acide sialique lié aux protéines et de la vitesse de sédimentation d'une population de la région de Cherbourg

The authors studied 3 parameters commonly used for the exploration of an inflammatory syndrome (determination of globular sedimentation rate at the first and second hour, concentration of plasma haptoglobin, sialic acid bound to plasma proteins rate). Haptoglobin and acid sialic assays were solely used in determining a control population (816 patients without any inflammatory reaction). As a matter of fact, the values we found complied with a normal distribution rule and confidence limits with a probability of 95% were obtained.