An exploratory study of psychosis risk factors in individuals who are referred but do not meet criteria for an early intervention in psychosis service.

BACKGROUND: The 'at-risk mental state' (ARMS) for psychosis has been critiqued for its limited prognostic ability and identification of a limited proportion of those who will develop a first episode of psychosis (FEP). Broadening the search for high-risk groups is key to improving population-level ascertainment of psychosis risk. AIMS: To explore risk enrichment in diagnostic, demographic and socio-functional domains among individuals referred to an early intervention in psychosis (EIP) service not meeting ARMS or FEP criteria. METHOD: A retrospective file review of 16 years of referrals to a tertiary EIP service in Ireland was undertaken. Diagnostic outcomes from standardised assessments (Structured Clinical Interview for DSM), demographic (age, gender, family history, nationality) and socio-occupational (relationship status, living status, working status) variables were compiled for those not meeting criteria. These were compared with individuals diagnosed with an FEP in the same period. RESULTS: From 2005 to 2021 inclusive, of 2025 index assessments, 27.6% (n = 558) did not meet either FEP or ARMS criteria, which is notably higher than the 5.4% (n = 110) meeting ARMS criteria. This group had high psychiatric morbidity, with 65.4% meeting criteria for at least one DSM Axis I disorder. Depressive, anxiety and substance use disorders predominated. Their functional markers were poor, and comparable to the FEP cohort. CONCLUSIONS: This group is enriched for psychosis risk factors. They are a larger group than those meeting ARMS criteria, a finding that may reflect EIP service configuration. They may be an important focus for further study in the search for at-risk populations beyond the current ARMS model.

Through COVID-19 and beyond: developing a multidisciplinary telehealth family intervention in first episode psychosis.

The COVID-19 pandemic presents unique challenges to high quality, safe Early Intervention in Psychosis (EIP) service provision. Due to the necessity to ensure EIP continues despite this, we developed a multidisciplinary, blended, telehealth intervention, incorporating psychoeducation and peer support, for family members of first episode psychosis service users: PERCEPTION. This perspective article aims to: describe PERCEPTION; offer reflections on our experience of delivering it; make recommendations for future research; and synthesise key learning to assist the integration of similar interventions in other EIP services. We provide a descriptive account of PERCEPTION's development and implementation, with reflections from the clinicians involved, on supporting families using this approach. We experienced telehealth as patient-focused, safe, and efficient and believe the intervention's blended nature augmented families' engagement. The approach adopted can assist service providers to attain balance between protecting public health and offering a meaningful, therapeutic intervention to support families in the current epoch.

Feeling stuck: exploring experiences of junior doctors.

OBJECTIVES: Staff working in mental health services provide care for individuals with a variety of difficulties, which can pose treatment challenges. Perceived lack of progress in patients can engender uncomfortable feelings within the clinician, such as frustration, 'heartsink' and 'feeling stuck'. The aim of this study was to explore the phenomenon of 'feeling stuck' amongst NCHDs in psychiatry. METHODS: A total of 30 participants were recruited from three psychiatric hospitals to complete a 15-item questionnaire. The survey was designed to pursue a thematic analysis. Participants were asked to complete the survey anonymously, either online or paper version. The analysis was carried out by two researchers using open coding, with themes finalised through collective discourse. RESULTS: Three themes were elicited from the data. The central theme - 'causes of feeling stuck' - consisted of three subthemes (patient, doctor and system factors). Participants were adept at describing patient and system factors, but reflected on doctor factors, such as countertransference, less often and in less detail. Other themes, explored in less detail by respondents, were 'the experience of feeling stuck' and 'responses to feeling stuck', with participants tending to seek solutions to, rather than an understanding of, these feelings. CONCLUSIONS: Trainee psychiatrists can clearly identify the situations where they are 'stuck' with clinical interactions. In spite of clinical supervision and reflective practice groups, they desire further training in managing these scenarios. NCHDs would benefit from further training, using these 'stuck' interactions as material, to further develop their understanding of the underlying factors in both themselves and their patients.

Over the Cuckoo's Nest: Does Experiencing Electroconvulsive Therapy Change Your Mind? A Mixed Methods Study of Attitudes and Impact of Electroconvulsive Therapy on Patients and Their Relatives.

OBJECTIVE: Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is an effective treatment for major depressive disorder, but some aspects remain controversial. Few studies have taken an in-depth mixed methods approach toward the study of attitudes, and there are no significant studies that explore the change of attitudes before and after treatment. The aim was to compare attitudes of patients and their relatives before and after ECT using quantitative and qualitative methods. METHODS: One hundred twenty-three participants were recruited. Forty-one patient/relative participants were recruited from 2 accredited ECT centers along with 82 age- and sex-matched general population controls. A validated 22-item survey about attitudes toward ECT was administered. Patient/relative participants completed the survey before treatment with ECT and engaged in a repeat survey and a semistructured interview 1 month after completion of ECT. Control participants completed the survey on a single occasion. RESULTS: Control versus pre-ECT surveys and pre-ECT versus post-ECT surveys both demonstrated statistically and clinically significant positive attitudinal differences (Cohen d = 1.37, P < 0.001; Cohen d = 1.2, P < 0.001). These differences were maintained for both the patient and relative pre/post subgroups (Cohen d = 1.15, P < 0.001; Cohen d = 1.33, P < 0.001). Qualitative analysis identified 13 attitudinal transitions in cognition, emotion, and imagery domains. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to examine a change in attitudes toward ECT of patients, their relatives, and with controls using mixed methods. The findings suggest a 2-phase positive attitudinal change, in which accurate information (phase 1) and experiential learning (phase 2) are both key components. These findings address stigma through accurate knowledge and experiential learning, with a positive outcome through changed attitudes.

Assessing Public Attitudes to Electroconvulsive Therapy: Validation of the Modified ECT Attitudes Questionnaire Using a Systematic Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is an established treatment for major depressive disorder, yet it remains controversial. Attitudes toward ECT have been studied in members of the public and service users, with diverse findings. There is no systematically validated scale to quantify attitudes. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to validate a scale measuring attitudes toward ECT using a systematic analysis. METHODS: Validation consisted of 3 stages: item generation, theoretical analysis, and psychometric analysis. A total of 196 members of the public were surveyed, and the findings were used to perform principal component analysis, Cronbach alpha (CA), and interitem correlation. RESULTS: The Modified ECT Attitudes Questionnaire (EAQ) is a 22-item participant-rated questionnaire (0-44) consisting of 2 principal components: "moral and ethical perceptions of ECT" and "ECT as a last resort treatment." There was adequate reliability for the total EAQ (CA, 0.873) and each of the components (component 1 CA, 0.907; component 2 interitem correlation, 0.389). Among the 196 members of the public, the mean score was 20.4 (SD, 8.4), which equates to 46% positive responses. Component 1 elicited 39% positive responses; component 2 elicited 52% positive responses. The emotion components of attitudes elicited particularly negative responses. CONCLUSIONS: The EAQ is a validated and reliable scale for the measurement of attitudes toward ECT. Application of this scale to 196 members of the public indicates that negative attitudes are rooted in individuals' moral and ethical objections to ECT, particularly the emotion components of such attitudes. This scale can be applied to other groups, including service users, to further characterize attitudes that underlie the stigma toward ECT.