Same-day Hospital Discharge after Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy in a Gynecologic Oncology Practice: Feasibility, Safety, Predictors of Admission, and Adverse Outcomes.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: (1) Determine the feasibility and safety of same-day hospital discharge (SDHD) after minimally invasive hysterectomy (MIH) in a gynecologic oncology practice and (2) detail predictors of immediate postoperative hospital admission and multiple 30-day adverse outcomes. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Magee-Womens Hospital. PATIENTS: MIH by a gynecologic oncologist between January 2017 and July 2019. INTERVENTIONS: Clinicopathologic, operative, and medical characteristics, as well as 30-day postoperative complications, emergency department (ED) encounters, and hospital readmissions were extracted. Admitted and SDHD patients were compared using descriptive, chi-square, Fisher's exact, t test, and logistic regression analyses. Univariate and multivariable analyses (MVA) revealed predictors of postoperative hospital admission, 30-day readmission, and a 30-day composite adverse event variable (all-reported postoperative complications, ED encounter, and/or readmission). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 1124 patients were identified, of which 77.3% had cancer or precancer; 775 patients (69.0%) underwent SDHD. On MVA, predictors of postoperative admission included older age, distance from hospital, longer procedure length, operative complications, start time after 2 PM, radical hysterectomy, minilaparotomy, adhesiolysis, cardiac disease, cerebrovascular disease, venous thromboembolism, diabetes, and neurologic disorders (p <.05). Moreover, 30-day adverse outcomes were rare (complication 8.7% National Surgical Quality Improvement Program/11.9% all-reported; ED encounter 5.0%; readmission 3.6%). SDHD patients had fewer all-reported complications (10.3% vs 15.5%, p = .01), no difference in ED encounters (4.6% vs 5.7%, p = .44), and fewer observed readmissions (2.8% vs 5.2%, p = .05). Predictors of readmission were identified on univariate; MVA was not feasible given the low number of events. Longer procedure length and cardiac and obstructive pulmonary disease were predictors of the composite adverse event variable (p <.05). CONCLUSION: SDHD is feasible and safe after MIH within a representative gynecologic oncology practice. Clinicopathologic, medical, and surgical predictors of multiple adverse outcomes were comprehensively described. By identifying patients at high risk of postoperative adverse events, we can direct SDHD selection in the absence of standardized institutional and/or national consensus guidelines and identify patients for prehabilitation and increased perioperative support.

Do air gaps with image-guided vaginal cuff brachytherapy impact failure rates in patients with high-intermediate risk FIGO Stage I endometrial cancer?

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the impact of air gaps at the cylinder surface on the rate of vaginal cuff failure (VCF) after image-guided adjuvant vaginal cuff brachytherapy (VCBT) in the treatment of high-intermediate risk (HIR) FIGO (Fédération Internationale de Gynécologie et d'Obstétrique (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics)) Stage I endometrial cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A retrospective review of patients treated with image-guided VCBT from 2009 to 2016 for HIR FIGO Stage I endometrial cancer was performed. Air gaps present at the applicator surface on the first postinsertion CT were contoured. Vaginal cuff failure-free survival (VCFFS) was measured from the first fraction of VCBT to VCF. RESULTS: A total of 234 patients were identified. Air gaps were present on the first postinsertion CT scan in 82% of patients. The median number of air gaps was 2 (interquartile range [IQR] 1-3), median depth of the largest air gap was 2.7 mm (IQR 2.1-3.4 mm), and the median cumulative volume of air gaps was less than 0.1 cm3 (range < 0.1-0.7 cm3). At a median followup of 56 months (IQR 41-69), 12 patients (5%) experienced VCF, of which 4 had isolated VCF and 8 had synchronous pelvic or distant failure. Five-year VCFFS and isolated VCFFS were 96% (95% confidence interval 93-98%) and 98% (95% confidence interval 96-100%), respectively. On univariate analysis, no factors, including the presence, number, maximum depth, or cumulative volume of air gaps, were predictive for VCFFS. CONCLUSIONS: In this population, VCFFS remained high despite most patients having air gaps present on postinsertion CT scan.

Dose-escalated intensity modulated radiation therapy in patients with locally-advanced vulvar cancer - does it increase response rate?

PURPOSE: GOG 205 safely increased clinical (cCR) and pathologic complete response (pCR) in locally-advanced vulvar cancer through dose escalation using three-dimensional radiotherapy (RT). The aim of this study is to assess the response of dose-escalated intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in locally-advanced vulvar cancer. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients treated with dose-escalated (≥ 55Gy) IMRT from 2012 to 2018 for locally-advanced vulvar cancer was performed. Patients treated with preoperative or definitive intent were included. Rates of cCR and pCR were assessed, and predictors of disease-free survival (DFS) were analyzed using the Kaplan Meier method with log rank test between groups and a parsimonious multivariate Cox model. RESULTS: Median dose to the vulva was 66.0 Gy (Interquartile Range [IQR]: 66.0-68.0) for definitive and 59.4 Gy (IQR: 58.0-59.4) for preoperative IMRT. The overall rates of cCR and pCR were 76% and 70%, respectively. DFS at two years was 65% (95% Confidence Interval [CI] 50-80%) for all patients, 81% (95% CI 63% - 98%) for definitive IMRT, and 55% (95% CI 35% - 76%) for preoperative IMRT. On multivariate analysis, cCR predicted for disease-free survival (HR 0.21; 95% CI 0.06-0.76; p = 0.02), and pCR predicted for OS (HR 0.12; 95% CI 0.02-0.60; p = 0.01). Grade 3 acute and late RT toxicity was seen in 14 (29%) and 3 (6%) of patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: Dose-escalated IMRT for locally-advanced vulvar cancer is well tolerated, with rates of cCR and pCR that compare favorably with published data.

Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation Therapy Followed by Extrafascial Hysterectomy in Locally Advanced Type II Endometrial Cancer Clinically Extending to Cervix.

PURPOSE: The role of neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy in locally advanced type II endometrial cancer is controversial. We thus aimed to present our experience with the hypothesis that neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy is associated with similarly high rates of downstaging and locoregional control for type II endometrial cancer and type I endometrial cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Thirty-four patients with type II endometrial cancer with clinical evidence of cervical ± parametrium involvement treated with neoadjuvant external beam radiation therapy (45-50.4 Gy in 25-28 fractions) and high-dose-rate brachytherapy with a median total dose of 20 Gy (range, 15-27.5) in 4 fractions (range, 3-5) and concurrent platinum chemotherapy ± adjuvant chemotherapy from 2008 to 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with type I pathologic diagnoses and those treated with definitive (rather than preoperative) intent were excluded. RESULTS: Pathologic characteristics were as follows: 38% were carcinosarcoma, 18% serous, and 24% clear cell. Ninety-four percent of patients were downstaged to an extrafascial hysterectomy, and 94% had negative surgical margins. The 2-year local control, regional control, distant control, disease-free survival, and overall survival were 87.8%, 81.3%, 76.3%, 52.5%, and 63.7%, respectively. There was 1 subacute grade 3 and 1 late grade 3 small bowel obstruction, directly attributable to radiation therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy effectively downstages the majority of locally advanced type II endometrial cancers, thereby increasing the likelihood of achieving complete resection with negative margins.