ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Cognitive deficits can impact daily functioning, general health, and psychological functioning. Multimodal group rehabilitation interventions designed for telehealth administration can optimally provide access and essential services for those who would otherwise not seek these services. We conducted a quality improvement project examining the feasibility and acceptability of Building Resilience and Improving Neurocognition (BRAIN), an eight-week multimodal telehealth cognitive rehabilitation group. METHOD: Participants were veterans referred to a VA neuropsychology clinic for group cognitive rehabilitation. Self-report measures were used to collect information about general health, cognitive, and psychological concerns pre- and post-intervention. Twenty-two veterans with cognitive concerns pertaining to psychosocial factors or neurocognitive disorders completed pre- and post-intervention outcome measures. RESULTS: Paired samples t-tests evaluated whether BRAIN improved self-reported emotional and functional status based on five self-report measures: MSNQ, WHODAS 2.0, PHQ-9, GAD-7, and PCL-5. Results showed clinically significant reductions on the MSNQ, PHQ-9 and PCL-5, with moderate effect sizes. On the MSNQ, participants endorsed decreased symptom severity on items associated with distractibility, slowed problem solving, requiring reminders, and difficulty multitasking. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that BRAIN holds promise as a telehealth cognitive rehabilitation group intervention for reducing subjective cognitive concerns and symptoms of depression and PTSD.
ABSTRACT
Objective: Despite a growing body of literature on sexual harassment and inappropriate patient sexual behavior towards clinicians within the broader fields of psychology and medicine, literature, guidance, and supervision frameworks specific to neuropsychology are lacking. This gap in the literature is significant, given that neuropsychology is a specialty field faced with vulnerabilities to sexual harassment, and neuropsychologists may weigh unique factors into their decision-making of whether and/or when to respond. This decision-making may be further complicated for trainees. Method: A review of the literature addressing sexual harassment by patients in neuropsychology was completed. In this paper, we summarize the relevant literature on sexual harassment within psychology and academic medicine and provide a framework for discussing sexual harassment in neuropsychology supervision. Results: Research suggests high rates of inappropriate sexual behavior and/or sexual harassment from patients towards trainees, especially amongst trainees who identify as female and/or hold marginalized identities. Trainees report inadequate training in how to deal with sexual harassment by patients and there are perceived barriers for discussing the topic in supervision. Further, most professional organizations do not have formal policies regarding how to handle incidents. Conclusions: As of this writing, guidance and/or position statements from prominent neuropsychological associations could not be found. Research and guidance specific to neuropsychology is needed to help clinicians navigate these challenging clinical situations, provide effective supervision on the topic to trainees, and normalize discussion and reporting of sexual harassment.
