ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this paper was to develop and test a novel control algorithm that enables stroke survivors to pedal a cycle in a desired cadence range despite varying levels of functional abilities after stroke. METHODS: A novel algorithm was developed which automatically adjusts 1) the intensity of functional electrical stimulation (FES) delivered to the leg muscles, and 2) the current delivered to an electric motor. The algorithm automatically switches between assistive, uncontrolled, and resistive modes to accommodate for differences in functional impairment, based on the mismatch between the desired and actual cadence. Lyapunov-based methods were used to theoretically prove that the rider's cadence converges to the desired cadence range. To demonstrate the controller's real-world performance, nine chronic stroke survivors performed two cycling trials: 1) volitional effort only and 2) volitional effort accompanied by the control algorithm assisting and resisting pedaling as needed. RESULTS: With a desired cadence range of 50-55 r/min, the developed controller resulted in an average rms cadence error of 1.90 r/min, compared to 6.16 r/min during volitional-only trials. CONCLUSION: Using FES and an electric motor with a two-sided cadence control objective to assist and resist volitional efforts enabled stroke patients with varying strength and abilities to pedal within a desired cadence range. SIGNIFICANCE: A protocol design that constrains volitional movements with assistance and resistance from FES and a motor shows potential for FES cycles and other rehabilitation robots during stroke rehabilitation.
Subject(s)
Algorithms , Bicycling/physiology , Electric Stimulation/methods , Stroke Rehabilitation/methods , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Nonlinear Dynamics , Robotics , Young AdultABSTRACT
Closed-loop control of functional electrical stimulation coupled with motorized assistance to induce cycling is a rehabilitative strategy that can improve the mobility of people with neurological conditions (NCs). However, robust control methods, which are currently pervasive in the cycling literature, have limited effectiveness due to the use of high stimulation intensity leading to accelerated fatigue during cycling protocols. This paper examines the design of a distributed repetitive learning controller (RLC) that commands an independent learning feedforward term to each of the six stimulated lower-limb muscle groups and an electric motor during the tracking of a periodic cadence trajectory. The switched controller activates lower limb muscles during kinematic efficient regions of the crank cycle and provides motorized assistance only when most needed (i.e., during the portions of the crank cycle where muscles evoke a low torque output). The controller exploits the periodicity of the desired cadence trajectory to learn from previous control inputs for each muscle group and electric motor. A Lyapunov-based stability analysis guarantees asymptotic tracking via an invariance-like corollary for nonsmooth systems. The switched distributed RLC was evaluated in experiments with seven able-bodied individuals and five participants with NCs. A mean root-mean-squared cadence error of 3.58 ± 0.43 revolutions per minute (RPM) (0.07 ± 7.35% average error) and 4.26 ± 0.84 RPM (0.1 ± 8.99% average error) was obtained for the healthy and neurologically impaired populations, respectively.
Subject(s)
Electric Stimulation Therapy/methods , Machine Learning , Neurological Rehabilitation/methods , Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted , Adult , Bicycling , Electric Stimulation Therapy/instrumentation , Exercise Therapy/instrumentation , Exercise Therapy/methods , Female , Humans , Male , Neurological Rehabilitation/instrumentation , Postural Balance , Young AdultABSTRACT
For an individual suffering from a neurological condition, such as spinal cord injury, traumatic brain injury, or stroke, motorized functional electrical stimulation (FES) cycling is a rehabilitation strategy, which offers numerous health benefits. Motorized FES cycling is an example of physical human-robot interaction in which both systems must be controlled; the human is actuated by applying neuromuscular electrical stimulation to the large leg muscle groups, and the cycle is actuated through its onboard electric motor. While the rider is stimulated using a robust sliding-mode controller, the cycle utilizes an admittance controller to preserve rider safety. The admittance controller is shown to be passive with respect to the rider, and the cadence controller is shown to be globally exponentially stable through a Lyapunov-like switched systems stability analysis. Experiments are conducted on three able-bodied participants and four participants with neurological conditions (NCs) to demonstrate the efficacy of the developed controller and investigate the effect of manipulating individual admittance parameters. Results demonstrate an average admittance cadence error of -0.06±1.47 RPM for able-bodied participants and -0.02 ± 0.93 RPM for participants with NCs.
Subject(s)
Bicycling/physiology , Electric Stimulation Therapy/methods , Rehabilitation/methods , Adult , Algorithms , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Muscle, Skeletal/physiology , Nervous System Diseases/rehabilitation , Patient Safety , Robotics , Spinal Cord Injuries/rehabilitation , Treatment Outcome , Young AdultABSTRACT
Two common rehabilitation therapies for individuals possessing neurological conditions are functional electrical stimulation (FES) and robotic assistance. This paper focuses on combining the two rehabilitation strategies for use on the biceps brachii muscle group. FES is used to elicit muscle contractions to actuate the forearm and a rehabilitation robot is used to challenge the muscle group in its efforts. Two controllers were developed and implemented to accomplish the multifaceted objective, both of which achieve global exponential stability for position and torque tracking as proven through a Lyapunov stability analysis. Experiments performed on one able bodied individual demonstrate an average RMS error of 5.8 degrees for position tracking and 0.40 Newton-meters for torque tracking.