ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) is currently considered the gold standard for peanut allergy diagnosis. However, this procedure that requires the hospitalization of patients, mostly children, in specialized centers for oral exposure to allergens may cause severe reactions requiring emergency measures. Thus, a simpler and safer diagnosis procedure is needed. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of a new set of in vitro blood tests for peanut allergy. METHODS: The levels of IgE directed towards peanut extract and recombinant peanut allergens Ara h 1, Ara h 2, Ara h 3, Ara h 6, Ara h 7, and Ara h 8 were measured in 3 groups of patients enrolled at 2 independent centers: patients with proven peanut allergy (n=166); pollen-sensitized subjects without peanut allergy (n=61), and control subjects without allergic disease (n=10). RESULTS: Seventy-nine percent of the pollen-sensitized patients showed IgE binding to peanut, despite their tolerance to peanut. In contrast, combining the results of specific IgE to peanut extract and to recombinant Ara h 2 and Ara h 6 yielded a peanut allergy diagnosis with a 98% sensitivity and an 85% specificity at a positivity threshold of 0.10 kU/l. Use of a threshold of 0.23 kU/l for recombinant Ara h 2 increased specificity (96%) at the cost of sensitivity (93%). CONCLUSION: A simple blood test can be used to diagnose peanut allergy with a high level of precision. However, DBPCFC will remain useful for the few cases where immunological and clinical observations yield conflicting results.
Subject(s)
2S Albumins, Plant/immunology , Antigens, Plant/immunology , Glycoproteins/immunology , Immunoassay/methods , Peanut Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , 2S Albumins, Plant/genetics , Adolescent , Antigens, Plant/genetics , Arachis/genetics , Arachis/immunology , Arachis/metabolism , Child , Child, Preschool , Double-Blind Method , Female , Glycoproteins/genetics , Humans , Immunoglobulin E/blood , Infant , Male , Peanut Hypersensitivity/immunology , Recombinant Proteins/genetics , Recombinant Proteins/immunology , Sensitivity and SpecificityABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: In a randomized trial, we compared the success of Burch retropubic urethropexy to the modified anterior colporrhaphy for the treatment of genuine stress urinary incontinence. METHODS: Thirty-five patients with stress incontinence were randomly assigned to undergo Burch retropubic urethropexy or modified anterior colporrhaphy. Subjects had preoperative and 1-year postoperative physical examinations, multichannel urodynamic testing, 20-minute pad test, and subjective grading of incontinence severity with questionnaires. Data were evaluated using Fisher exact test, Wilcoxon two-sample test, logistic regression analysis, and analysis of variance. RESULTS: Objective cure 1 year postoperatively was significantly greater for the women treated by Burch retropubic urethropexy than by modified anterior colporrhaphy (16 of 18 [89%] versus five of 16 [31%], relative risk .15, 95% confidence interval .04, .59). Patients' subjective ratings of incontinence severity 1 year after surgical treatment were significantly lower in women who had Burch retropubic urethropexy. CONCLUSION: Burch retropubic urethropexy yields a significantly superior objective cure for genuine stress urinary incontinence than the modified anterior colporrhaphy in a randomized trial.
Subject(s)
Urinary Incontinence, Stress/surgery , Adult , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Urethra , Urologic Surgical Procedures/methods , UterusABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate postoperative pain relief of intramuscular ketorolac, topical bupivacaine, and placebo in patients undergoing laparoscopic tubal sterilization with silastic bands. METHODS: One hundred five women undergoing laparoscopic tubal sterilization with silastic bands were randomized to one of three groups: one received intramuscular ketorolac and topical placebo applied to the fallopian tubes, the second received intramuscular placebo and topical bupivacaine, and the third received intramuscular placebo and topical placebo. Surgical procedures, anesthesia, and recovery were conducted with standardized protocols. Postoperative pain perception was graded using the modified McGill pain intensity scale at 30 minutes postoperatively, at discharge from the recovery room, and the next morning by telephone interview. Other measured variables included postoperative vomiting, additional analgesia requirement, and length of time spent in the recovery room. RESULTS: Only topical bupivacaine was found to decrease postoperative pain scores significantly over those with placebo, at 30 minutes postoperatively (median score 2 compared with 4, P = .002) and at discharge from the recovery room (median score 2 compared with 3, P = .03). There was no significant decrease in pain scores with intramuscular ketorolac compared with placebo. No differences in pain scores were found between the three groups at the next morning phone call. There were no significant differences between the three groups with respect to requirements for supplemental pain medications in the recovery room, incidence of postoperative vomiting, or length of time spent in the recovery room. CONCLUSION: Topical bupivacaine decreases postoperative pain scores significantly compared with placebo in women undergoing laparoscopic tubal sterilization with silastic bands.