ABSTRACT
Advocacy by feminists and healthcare providers was essential in passing the 2012 bill legalizing abortion in Uruguay, which was primarily framed in terms of a public health imperative. Prior to legalization, a group of influential physicians had established a "harm reduction" approach consisting of pre- and postabortion counseling with a focus on safer abortion methods. The existence of a network of providers from this initiative facilitated the implementation of abortion services after legalization. Particularities of the Uruguayan model include a strong focus on medical abortion, and a multidisciplinary approach to patient counseling. The implementation of services was largely successful, and rates of abortion-related morbidity and mortality have decreased. Remaining concerns include high rates of conscientious objection and insufficient human resources to staff interdisciplinary counseling teams. The focus on medical abortion has led to a lack of method choice. Finally, data collection gaps complicate monitoring and identification of barriers to access.
Subject(s)
Abortion, Legal/legislation & jurisprudence , Harm Reduction , Counseling/organization & administration , Female , Humans , National Health Programs/organization & administration , Pregnancy , UruguayABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the strategies developed by the health centers to implement the law of legal abortion (LA) in public services of the primary care in Montevideo, Uruguay. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A qualitative research was conducted combining techniques of document analysis, self-administered questionnaires to key informants, and in-depth interviews with directors of health centers. A simple summative index of accessibility to abortion services was built. RESULTS: The law approved in Uruguay in 2012 demanded the development of a strategy to promote women's accessibility to LA in the public primary care system. The services failed to fully implement the strategy, due to institutional barriers. CONCLUSION: Despite the wide availability of LA services in primary care and that they are an integral part of sexual and reproductive health benefits, there is an important barrier to their use in the number of gynecologists that appeal to conscientious objection.
OBJETIVO: Analizar las estrategias desarrolladas por los centros de salud para implementar la ley de interrupción voluntaria del embarazo (IVE) en los servicios públicos del primer nivel de atención en Montevideo, Uruguay. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Investigación cualitativa, que combinó técnicas de análisis documental y cuestionarios autoadministrados a informantes clave y entrevistas semidirigidas a directores de centros de salud. Se construyó un índice sumatorio simple de accesibilidad a las prestaciones de IVE en el centro de salud. RESULTADOS: La ley aprobada en Uruguay en 2012 exigió el desarrollo de una estrategia para favorecer la accesibilidad de las mujeres a la IVE en el primer nivel de atención público. Los servicios no lograron implementar cabalmente la estrategia por dificultades institucionales. CONCLUSIÓN: Pese a la amplia disponibilidad de servicios públicos de IVE en el primer nivel de atención y a que forman parte de las prestaciones en salud sexual y reproductiva, lo que favorece integralidad en la atención, persiste una barrera importante en el alto porcentaje de ginecólogos objetores de conciencia.
Subject(s)
Abortion, Legal , Health Services Accessibility , Primary Health Care/organization & administration , Abortion, Legal/legislation & jurisprudence , Abortion, Legal/psychology , Abortion, Legal/statistics & numerical data , Ambulatory Care Facilities , Attitude of Health Personnel , Conscience , Female , Gynecology , Humans , Pregnancy , Public Health , UruguayABSTRACT
Resumen: Objetivo: Analizar las estrategias desarrolladas por los centros de salud para implementar la ley de interrupción voluntaria del embarazo (IVE) en los servicios públicos del primer nivel de atención en Montevideo, Uruguay. Material y métodos: Investigación cualitativa, que combinó técnicas de análisis documental y cuestionarios autoadministrados a informantes clave y entrevistas semidirigidas a directores de centros de salud. Se construyó un índice sumatorio simple de accesibilidad a las prestaciones de IVE en el centro de salud. Resultados: La ley aprobada en Uruguay en 2012 exigió el desarrollo de una estrategia para favorecer la accesibilidad de las mujeres a la IVE en el primer nivel de atención público. Los servicios no lograron implementar cabalmente la estrategia por dificultades institucionales. Conclusión: Pese a la amplia disponibilidad de servicios públicos de IVE en el primer nivel de atención y a que forman parte de las prestaciones en salud sexual y reproductiva, lo que favorece integralidad en la atención, persiste una barrera importante en el alto porcentaje de ginecólogos objetores de conciencia.
Abstract: Objective: To analyze the strategies developed by the health centers to implement the law of legal abortion (LA) in public services of the primary care in Montevideo, Uruguay. Materials and methods: A qualitative research was conducted combining techniques of document analysis, self-administered questionnaires to key informants, and in-depth interviews with directors of health centers. A simple summative index of accessibility to abortion services was built. Results: The law approved in Uruguay in 2012 demanded the development of a strategy to promote women's accessibility to LA in the public primary care system. The services failed to fully implement the strategy, due to institutional barriers. Conclusion: Despite the wide availability of LA services in primary care and that they are an integral part of sexual and reproductive health benefits, there is an important barrier to their use in the number of gynecologists that appeal to conscientious objection.
