Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Br J Anaesth ; 86(4): 565-7, 2001 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11573633

ABSTRACT

We compared three types of catheter fixation application for their ability to minimize the incidence and magnitude of epidural catheter movement during labour. Patients were randomized to have their epidural catheter secured by a Tegaderm dressing (group T; n = 35), a Tegaderm dressing plus filter-shoulder fixation (group F; n = 39), or a Niko Epi-Fix dressing (group N; n = 37). The length of catheter visible at the patient's skin surface was recorded (to the nearest 0.5 cm) after insertion and before removal; the difference was defined as 'catheter movement'. Outward movement of the catheter was greatest when a Niko Epi-Fix was used (P < 0.01). Concerning minimization of displacement of the epidural catheter per se, only a Tegaderm dressing with additional filter-shoulder fixation proved more effective than using a Niko Epi-Fix dressing (P < 0.05).


Subject(s)
Analgesia, Epidural/adverse effects , Analgesia, Obstetrical/adverse effects , Bandages , Foreign-Body Migration/prevention & control , Obstetric Labor Complications/prevention & control , Analgesia, Epidural/instrumentation , Analgesia, Obstetrical/instrumentation , Catheterization, Peripheral/adverse effects , Catheterization, Peripheral/instrumentation , Female , Foreign-Body Migration/etiology , Humans , Obstetric Labor Complications/etiology , Pregnancy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL