Mast Cell-related Prognosis Signature Characterizes Immune Landscape and Predicts Prognosis of Ovarian Cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Ovarian cancer (OVC) is a common, aggressive, and heterogeneous malignancy, with a widely variable prognosis. With the advances of modern immunology, mast cells (MCs) have been shown to play a significant role in the prognosis of some malignant tumors. However, the role of mast cells in the prognosis of OVC is unknown. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, MC-associated prognostic genes (MRGs) were used to classify OVC from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA)-OVC cohort. Genes were evaluated using univariate cox regression analysis. Twenty-nine prognostic gene signatures were identified using LASSO-COX analysis. COX regression models and principal component analysis (PCA) algorithms were used to construct MRG scores and individual MRGs patterns. External validation was performed in the TCGA-breast cancer (BRCA) and IMvigor210 cohorts. Immunity analysis based on MRGs was performed using CIBERSORT, and GSVA methods, and immunotherapy response was evaluated using the TIDE website. RESULTS: Using TCGA-OVC data, we established a model for constructing MRG scores based on the twenty-nine identified prognostic gene signatures using the PCA algorithm. MRG scores were found to be strongly correlated with immune cell infiltration and were excellent predictors of prognosis in patients with OVC. Low MRG scores were associated with better prognosis and better response to immunotherapy and chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: MC-related prognosis signature characterizes the immune landscape and predicts the prognosis of OVC. Understanding the correlation between MC-related gene signatures and immunotherapy and chemotherapy may improve the development of personalized clinical treatment strategies.

Determination of Ideal Factors for Early Adoption and Standardization of Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing for Respiratory System Infections.

BACKGROUND: Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) demonstrates great promise as a diagnostic tool for determining the cause of pathogenic infections. The standard diagnostic procedures (SDP) include smears and cultures and are typically viewed as less sensitive and more time-consuming when compared to mNGS. There are concerns about the logistics and ease of transition from SDP to mNGS. mNGS lacks standardization of collection processes, databases, and sequencing. Additionally, there is the burden of training clinicians on interpreting mNGS results. OBJECTIVE: Until now, few studies have explored factors that could be used as early adoption candidates to ease the transition between SDP and mNGS. This study evaluated 123 patients who had received both SDP and mNGS and compared several variables across a diagnostic test evaluation. METHODS: The diagnostic test evaluation observed metrics such as sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios (PLR, NLR), positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV), and accuracy. Factors included various sample sources such as bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF), lung tissue, and cerebral spinal fluid (CSF). An additional factor observed was the patient's immune status. RESULTS: Pathogen detection was found to be significantly greater for mNGS for total patients, BALF sample source, CSF sample source, and non-immunocompromised patients (p<0.05). Pathogen detection was found to be insignificant for lung tissue sample sources and immunocompromised patients. Sensitivity, PLR, NLR, PPV, NPV, and accuracy appeared to be higher with mNGS for the total patients, BALF sample source, and non-immunocompromised patients when compared with SDP (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: With higher metrics in sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR, PPV, NPV, and accuracy for overall patients, mNGS may prove a better diagnostic tool than SDP. When addressing sample sources, mNGS for BALF-collected samples appeared to have higher scores than SDP for the same metrics. When patients were in a non-immunocompromised state, mNGS also demonstrated greater diagnostic benefits to BALF and overall patients compared to SDP. This study demonstrates that using BALF as a sample source and selecting non-immunocompromised patients may prove beneficial as early adoption factors for mNGS standard protocol. Such a study may pave the road for mNGS as a routine clinical method for determining the exact pathogenic etiology of lung infections.

Photodynamic Therapy, Probiotics, Acetic Acid, and Essential Oil in the Treatment of Chronic Wounds Infected with Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

As a prevalent medical problem that burdens millions of patients across the world, chronic wounds pose a challenge to the healthcare system. These wounds, often existing as a comorbidity, are vulnerable to infections. Consequently, infections hinder the healing process and complicate clinical management and treatment. While antibiotic drugs remain a popular treatment for infected chronic wounds, the recent rise of antibiotic-resistant strains has hastened the need for alternative treatments. Future impacts of chronic wounds are likely to increase with aging populations and growing obesity rates. With the need for more effective novel treatments, promising research into various wound therapies has seen an increased demand. This review summarizes photodynamic therapy, probiotics, acetic acid, and essential oil studies as developing antibiotic-free treatments for chronic wounds infected with Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Clinicians may find this review informative by gaining a better understanding of the state of current research into various antibiotic-free treatments. Furthermore. this review provides clinical significance, as clinicians may seek to implement photodynamic therapy, probiotics, acetic acid, or essential oils into their own practice.