Breast Implant-Associated Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma: Proposal for a Monitoring Protocol.

BACKGROUND: The authors report four cases of breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) from a single institution and propose a multidisciplinary protocol. METHODS: From 2012 to 2014, four breast implant-associated ALCL cases were diagnosed. The authors performed the original operation, and no patients were referred to their practice. Cases 1, 2, and 4 were CD4/CD30/ALK ALCL with previous textured-implant reconstruction, whereas case 3 was CD8/CD30/ALK ALCL with previous polyurethane-implant augmentation. A retrospective study of all patients who underwent breast implant positioning was performed to identify any misdiagnosed cases. RESULTS: Of 483 patients, 226 underwent reconstruction with latissimus dorsi flap and prosthesis, 115 had skin-sparing/nipple-sparing mastectomy and prosthesis, 117 underwent an expander/implant procedure, and 25 underwent breast augmentation. Fifty-eight cases (12 percent) underwent implant replacement for capsular contracture, 15 (3.1 percent) experienced late-onset seroma, and four (0.83 percent) had both capsular contracture and seroma. Seventy-seven symptomatic patients (16 percent) underwent surgical revision (capsulectomy/capsulotomy) and/or seroma evacuation. The second look on histologic specimens did not identify misdiagnosed cases. A multidisciplinary protocol for suspected implant-associated ALCL was established. Ultrasound and cytologic examinations are performed in case of periprosthetic effusion. If implant-associated ALCL is diagnosed, implant removal with capsulectomy is performed. If disseminated disease is detected through positron emission tomography/computed tomography of the total body, the patient is referred to the oncology department. CONCLUSIONS: A multidisciplinary protocol is mandatory for both early diagnosis and patient management. Until definitive data emerge regarding the exact etiopathogenesis of breast implant-associated ALCL, the authors suggest offering only autologous reconstruction if patients desire it. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, V.

Lenalidomide monotherapy in heavily pretreated patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma: an Italian observational multicenter retrospective study in daily clinical practice.

Clinical trial results indicate that lenalidomide, an immunomodulatory drug, is a promising treatment in relapsed/refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). This retrospective multicenter study was conducted in patients with relapsed/refractory NHL treated with lenalidomide monotherapy through a Named Patient Program in Italy. Principal endpoints were overall response rate (ORR), safety and overall survival (OS). The ORR in 64 evaluable patients was 42.2% and was similar among patients receiving 10, 15 or 25 mg/day lenalidomide. Response rates in patients with mantle cell, diffuse large B-cell and follicular lymphoma were 45.5%, 42.1% and 20%, respectively. Among patients who responded to most recent prior therapy, ORR was 50.0% versus 36.8% in patients with refractory NHL. Mean duration of response in patients receiving any lenalidomide dose was 10.5 months; 1-year progression-free survival and OS were 50.3% and 82.6%, respectively. These findings suggest that lenalidomide is effective and safe for heavily pretreated patients with NHL in the clinical setting.

Intrathecal anti-CD20 antibody: an effective and safe treatment for leptomeningeal lymphoma.

A patient with relapsed B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) infiltrating the Central nervous system (CNS) and resistant to chemotherapy was treated with intrathecal Rituximab (IT RTX), administered weekly for eight weeks at increasing doses, from 10 to 40 mg. After the second administration the patient showed significant clinical improvement and Cerebro spinal fluid (CSF) clearance of lymphomatous cells. A MRI scan performed after 30 days from the start of therapy showed full regression of lymphomatous infiltration. This report confirms the efficacy and safety of IT RTX in the treatment of CNS B-cell NHL.

Positive selection of CD34+ cells by immunoadsorption: factors affecting the final yield and hematopoietic recovery in patients with hematological malignancies and solid tumors.

There is a progressive increase in the use of selected hematopoietic progenitor cells after myeloablative therapy in patients affected by malignancies. Our goal was to determine which blood parameters, in the starting cell population, influence the concentration of CD34+ progenitors and the removal of unwanted cells in the final product. Also, we evaluated the hematopoietic recovery and toxicity associated with peripheral blood stem cell infusion. We retrospectively reviewed 53 procedures of positive selection of CD34+ cells, performed with the Ceprate SC immunoadsorption system, in 47 paticnts affected by various hematologic malignancies and solid tumors. An increased percentage of CD34+ cells in the starting fraction was associated both with the final purity and enrichment of CD34+ cells and with a decreased percentage of CD3+ and CD19+ cells in the final product. A low platelet count before selection had a borderlinc influence on the recovery of CD34+ cells. Forty patients received a median of 5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg; the absolute neutrophil count (ANC) reached 0.5 x 10(9)/l in a median of 10 days whereas a PLT count above 20 x 10(9)/l was observed in 14 days. The reinfusion of selected CD34+ cells, containing a very low amount of dymethylsulfoxide. was well tolerated and no adverse reactions were observed. Autologous transplantation with selected CD34+ cells is a safe and well-tolerated procedure in patients affected by hematologic malignancies and solid tumors. Positive selection of CD34+ cells seems to be related to the quality of the apheresis products, particularly to the initial CD34+ cell and PLT content.