Prognostic factors influencing survival following re-resection for isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) -wildtype glioblastoma multiforme - Data from a national neuro-oncology registry.

The role of surgical resection in recurrent Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM) remains unclear. We aimed to investigate survival outcomes and associated prognostic factors in patients undergoing surgical re-resection for recurrent IDH-wildtype GBM in a national neuro-oncology center. We evaluated all patients who underwent re-resection for recurrent GBM following adjuvant treatment between 2015 and 2018. 32 patients were eligible for inclusion. 19 (59%) were male,median age at re-resection was 53. Median time from initial surgery to re-resection was 13.5 months. Median overall survival (OS) was 28.6 months from initial surgery and 9.5 months from re-resection. MGMT methylation was significantly associated with improved OS from initial surgery, 40 months versus 19.1 months, (p = 0.004), and from re-resection, 9.47 months versus 6.93 months, (p = 0.028). A late re-resection was associated with improved OS compared to an early re-resection, 44.1 months versus 15.7 months, (p = 0.002). There was a trend for improved outcomes in younger patients, median OS from initial surgery 44.1 months for <53 years compared to 21.7 months for patients ≥53, (p = 0.099). Higher Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) at re-resection was associated with improved median OS, 9.5 months versus 4.1 months for KPS ≥70 and <70 respectively, (p = 0.013). Furthermore, there was a trend for improved OS with greater extent of re-resection, however this did not reach statistical significance, possibly due to small sample size. Re-resection for recurrent GBM was associated with improved OS in those with good performance status and could be considered in carefully selected cases.

Chemotherapy in the Covid-19 era: the patient's perception.

BACKGROUND: The Covid-19 pandemic poses significant challenges for the management of patients with cancer. In our institution, we adapted our delivery of outpatient systemic anti-cancer therapy (SACT) by introducing a number of 'risk-reducing' measures including pre-assessment screening. AIMS: We sought to evaluate the experience and perceptions of patients with cancer undergoing SACT during the Covid-19 pandemic. METHODS: Patients on SACT during the Covid-19 pandemic were eligible for participation. Data were collected by anonymous survey over a 1 week period during the most intensive phase of government restrictions. Patients were asked questions under three headings: perceived risk of infection exposure, changes to treatment plan and psychological impact of Covid-19. RESULTS: One hundred patients were assessed, 60% were male, 41% were > 65 years of age and 67% had advanced cancer. Eleven percent of patients were living alone. Fifty-seven percent reported feeling at increased risk in general of contracting Covid-19. Sixty-eight percent of patients did not feel worried about contracting Covid-19 in the hospital. Ninety-two percent of patients reported wanting to continue on SACT as originally planned. Fifty-eighty percent felt isolated and 40% reported increased anxiety. CONCLUSION: Though patients on active treatment for cancer during the Covid-19 pandemic reported increased anxiety and feelings of isolation due to Covid-19, the majority of patients wanted to continue SACT as originally planned. Patients would benefit from enhanced psycho-oncological supports in the event of a prolonged Covid-19 pandemic.