Comparison of Using Intraoperative Computed Tomography-Based 3-Dimensional Navigation and Fluoroscopy in Anterior Cervical Diskectomy and Fusion for Cervical Spondylosis.

OBJECTIVE: Anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a highly successful procedure to treat spinal cord or nerve root compression; however, complications can still occur. With advancements in imaging, 3-dimensional (3D) reconstruction allows real-time instrument tracking in a surgical field relative to the patient's anatomy. Here, we compare plate positioning and short-term outcomes when using 3D navigation to fluoroscopy in ACDF for degenerative spine disease. METHODS: All ACDFs for cervical spondylosis performed by 6 surgeons at a single center between 2010 and 2018 were included. ACDFs were divided into those performed using 3D navigation or fluoroscopy. Records were assessed for patient demographics, American Society of Anesthesiology score, number of operated interspaces, operative time, length of stay, perioperative complications, and 90-day readmissions. Postoperative images were reviewed for lateral and angular plate deviations. RESULTS: A total of 193 ACDFs performed with 3D navigation and 728 performed with fluoroscopy were included. After controlling for demographics and surgical characteristics, using 3D navigation was associated with less lateral plate deviation (P = 0.048) and longer operative times per interspace (P < 0.001) but was not associated with angular plate deviation (P = 0.724), length of stay (P = 0.393), perioperative complications (P = 0.844), and 90-day readmissions (P = 0.539). CONCLUSIONS: Using 3D navigation in ACDF for degenerative disease is associated with slightly more midline plate positioning and comparable short-term outcomes as using fluoroscopy and can be a suitable alternative. Advantages of using this technology, such as improved visualization of anatomy, should be weighed against disadvantages, such as increased operative time, on a per-patient basis.

"There's got to be a better way": Global Perspectives of Medicolegal Environment and Neurosurgical Socioeconomics.

Neurosurgery is considered to have one of the greatest risks of medical malpractice claims. However, medicolegal issues in neurosurgery are often disregarded and underrated worldwide. Medical errors in the neurosurgical field can be attributed to multiple factors, including highly morbid pathologies, the technical difficulty of neurosurgical procedures, and the involvement and interaction of a multidisciplinary team in the care of neurosurgical patients. Health care providers worldwide are at risk of lawsuits, sometimes even when no deviation from the standard of care had occurred in a given case. Often, governments use additional tactics to decrease the burden on compensators and extrajudicial institutions and to decrease the court's flow of irrational litigation. Continuous amendments to health care acts and newer reforms to address these issues have materialized worldwide. In the present narrative review, we have reviewed the global perspectives of medicolegal issues, with a focus on neurosurgical discipline.

Neurosurgery Billing and Reimbursement in 2021.

Practicing neurosurgery in 2021 requires a detailed knowledge of the vocabulary and mechanisms for coding and reimbursement, which should include general knowledge at the global level and fluency at the provider level. It is specifically of interest for the neurosurgeon to understand conceptually the nuances of hospital reimbursement. That knowledge is especially germane as more neurosurgeons become hospital employees. Here we provide an overview of the mechanics of coding. We illustrate the formula to generate physician reimbursement through the current relative value unit structure. We also seek to explain hospital-level reimbursement through the diagnosis-related group structure. Finally, we expand about different and ancillary income streams available to neurosurgeons and provide a realistic assessment including the opportunities and challenges of those entities.

Socioeconomic Implications of Professional Relationships within Modern Care Delivery Systems.

No physician can successfully deliver high-value patient care in the modern-day health care system in isolation. Delivery of effective patient care requires integrated and collaborative systems that depend on dynamic professional relationships among members of the health care team. An overview of the socioeconomic implications of professional relationships within modern care delivery systems and potential employment models is presented.

Credentialing, Certification, and Peer Review Essentials for the Neurosurgeon.

Credentialing and certification are essential processes during hiring to ensure that the physician is competent and possesses the qualifications and skill sets claimed. Peer review ensures the continuing evolution of these skills to meet a standard of care. We have provided an overview and discussion of these processes in the United States. Credentialing is the process by which a physician is determined to be competent and able to practice, used to ensure that medical staff meets specific standards, and to grant operative privileges at an institution. Certification is a standardized affirmation of a physician's competence on a nationwide basis. Although not legally required to practice in the United States, many institutions emphasize certification for full privileges on an ongoing basis at a hospital. In the United States, peer review of adverse events is a mandatory prerequisite for accreditation. The initial lack of standardization led to the development of the Health Care Quality Improvement Act, which protects those involved in the peer review process from litigation, and the National Provider Databank, which was established as a national database to track misconduct. A focus on quality improvement in the peer review process can lead to improved performance and patient outcomes. A thorough understanding of the processes of credentialing, certification, and peer review in the United States will benefit neurosurgeons by allowing them to know what institutions are looking for as well and their rights and responsibilities in any given situation. It could also be useful to compare these policies and practices in the United States to those in other countries.

The Medical Legal Environment in Neurosurgery: An Informative Overview of the Stages of Litigation and Distinct Challenges.

Medical malpractice litigation is something that every neurosurgeon encounters in his or her career and causes significant strife to amateur physicians attempting to navigate the medicolegal process. Neurosurgery in particular is one of the highest risk specialties for litigation. This calls to order the importance of a clear understanding of the medicolegal proceedings that may follow after a complaint has been filed. This report describes the steps to be taken by the physician in the instance that litigation is expected or considered a possibility. We describe the elements that comprise a medical malpractice claim, details of the lawsuit process including hospital peer review and expert witness selection, and how to communicate appropriately with the patients and their families in an empathetic way. It is imperative to gain an appropriate understanding of the entirety of the malpractice claim process to ease the anxiety of litigation for the physician and decrease the amount of avoidable complications.

Advocacy to Government and Stakeholders.

Participation in the health care and government advocacy arena may represent new and challenging perspectives for the traditional neurosurgeon. However, those with a strong understanding of the laws, rules, regulations, and fiscal allocation process can directly influence the practice of neurosurgery in the United States. We seek to shine light on the black box of how health care laws are passed, the influence and techniques of lobbying, and the role and rules surrounding political action committees. This practical review of health care advocacy is supplemented by a blueprint for engagement in the political arena for the practicing neurosurgeon.

Optimizing Medical Care Via Practice Guidelines and Quality Improvement Initiatives.

In an effort, to curtail rising health care costs, government and private payers have begun to focus on measuring quality of care. Along with quality improvement initiatives, clinical practice guidelines may also be utilized to provide better care. Clinical practice guidelines are recommendations for clinicians about the care of patients with specific conditions. This review provides an overview of clinical practice guidelines and quality improvement initiatives to highlight strategies to optimize patient outcomes.

Contract Negotiation for Neurosurgeons: A Practical Guide.

Contract negotiation is a reality in the career of any neurosurgeon. However, little formal training exists for physicians - including neurosurgeons - on potential techniques and strategies for conducting meaningful contract negotiation. Increasing numbers of neurosurgeons seek hospital employment for which an employment contract will be provided. During contract negotiation, it is likely that a young neurosurgeon will be in discussion with an experienced negotiator acting on behalf of a hospital, practice, or department. Understanding and adapting to this imbalance in experience and using basic negotiating techniques as a means of approaching and resolving key contract issues is critical for the neurosurgeon to maximize his or her value in the course of contract negotiation. Even without formal training in negotiation in residency, negotiation skills can be taught, practiced, and improved. In affiliation with the Medical Director's Ad-Hoc Representational Section of Council of State Neurosurgical Societies (CSNS) this article is intended to serve as a practical guide for contract negotiation. Contract basics, negotiation terms, strategies, unique neurosurgical issues, and value creation are explored.

Use of 5-Aminolevulinic Acid for Confirmation of Lesional Biopsy Sample in Presumed High-Grade Glioma.

BACKGROUND: 5-amniolevulinic acid (5-ALA) assists neurosurgeons in defining operative margins during resection of high-grade gliomas, leading to improved rates of complete resection of enhancing tumor and progression-free survival. Here, we propose the use of 5-ALA in stereotactic biopsy for confirmation that the sample obtained is from the targeted mass. To the knowledge of the authors, this is the first known record of 5-ALA use for confirmation of pathologic specimen in stereotactic brain biopsy in the United States. This technique could be pivotal for lesions in highly eloquent areas where it is important to take as little tissue as possible in an effort to decrease neurologic deficits while still obtaining a diagnostic biopsy sample. CASE DESCRIPTION: The patient is a 67-year-old male who initially presented with computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging concerning for a high-grade glioma in the right basal ganglia and deep white matter of the frontal lobe. Final pathology concluded that specimens obtained during biopsy were indeed pathologic at the periphery of the lesion, and there was necrotic tissue at the center of the lesion. Fluorescence of biopsy samples was 100% concordant with pathologic analysis. CONCLUSIONS: 5-ALA may prove a useful tool for intraoperative confirmation of pathologic tissue, especially in areas of high eloquence, where small biopsy sizes are essential. It may also obviate the need for an intraoperative consultation to a pathologist. However, additional studies with larger study populations are warranted.

Effects of 5-ALA dose on resection of glioblastoma.

PURPOSE: Fluorescence-guided surgery (FGS) with the use of 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) leads to more extensive resection of high-grade glioma (HGG) and longer overall survival (OS) of patients compared to conventional resection. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of 5-ALA dosages on residual tumor volume (RTV) and OS in patients with glioblastoma. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study for patients who participated in a phase I and II dose-escalation clinical trial on 5-ALA for resection of HGG. A total of 25 patients were found to have newly diagnosed glioblastoma on histology and enrolled in our study. Patients receiving low doses of 5-ALA (10-30 mg/kg) (n = 6) were compared to those receiving high doses (40-50 mg/kg) (n = 19). Pre- and post-operative contrast enhanced T1W MRI were evaluated with volumetric analysis. RESULTS: Median RTV was 0.69 cm3 and 0.00 cm3 in the low and high dose groups respectively (p = 0.975). A gross total resection (GTR) was more likely in the high dose group, though this was not statistically significant. No significant difference was found in median OS between the high and low dose groups (p = 0.6787). CONCLUSIONS: High doses of 5-ALA FGS are associated with less RTV and greater probability of GTR. 5-ALA dose was not associated with OS. Further studies with a larger patient cohort are warranted.

Surgical treatments for essential tremor.

INTRODUCTION: Essential tremor is the most common form of pathologic tremor. Surgical therapies disrupt tremorogenic oscillation in the cerebellothalamocortical pathway and are capable of abolishing severe tremor that is refractory to available pharmacotherapies. Surgical methods are raspidly improving and are the subject of this review. Areas covered: A PubMed search on 18 January 2018 using the query essential tremor AND surgery produced 839 abstracts. 379 papers were selected for review of the methods, efficacy, safety and expense of stereotactic deep brain stimulation (DBS), stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), focused ultrasound (FUS) ablation, and radiofrequency ablation of the cerebellothalamocortical pathway. Expert commentary: DBS and SRS, FUS and radiofrequency ablations are capable of reducing upper extremity tremor by more than 80% and are far more effective than any available drug. The main research questions at this time are: 1) the relative safety, efficacy, and expense of DBS, SRS, and FUS performed unilaterally and bilaterally; 2) the relative safety and efficacy of thalamic versus subthalamic targeting; 3) the relative safety and efficacy of atlas-based versus direct imaging tractography-based anatomical targeting; and 4) the need for intraoperative microelectrode recordings and macroelectrode stimulation in awake patients to identify the optimum anatomical target. Randomized controlled trials are needed.

A Phase 1 Dose-Escalation Study of Oral 5-Aminolevulinic Acid in Adult Patients Undergoing Resection of a Newly Diagnosed or Recurrent High-Grade Glioma.

BACKGROUND: The utility of oral 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA)/protoporphyrin fluorescence for the resection of high-grade gliomas is well documented. This drug has received regulatory approval in Europe but awaits approval in the United States. OBJECTIVE: To identify the appropriate dose and toxicity or harms of 5-ALA used for enhanced intraoperative visualization of malignant brain tumors, reported from a single medical center in the United States. METHODS: Prior to craniotomy for resection of a presumed high-grade glioma, individuals were given oral 5-ALA as part of a rapid dose-escalation scheme. At least 3 patients were selected for each dose level from 10 to 50 mg/kg in 10 mg/kg increments. Adverse events, intensity of tumor fluorescence, and results of biopsies in areas of tumor and the tumor bed under white light and deep blue light were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 19 patients were studied in this phase 1 study. Serious adverse events were unrelated to the ingestion of 5-ALA. At the highest dose level studied (50 mg/kg), 2 out of 6 patients were observed to have transient dermatologic redness and peeling. These were grade 1 adverse events, which were not serious enough to be dose limiting. Patients at higher dose levels (>40 mg/kg) were more likely to have strong tumor fluorescence. There were no instances of false positive fluorescence. CONCLUSION: The use of 5-ALA for brain tumor fluorescence is safe and effective to a dose of 50 mg/kg. Dose-limiting toxicity was not reached in this study.

Successful bilateral subthalamic nucleus stimulation for segmental dystonia after unilateral pallidotomy.

BACKGROUND: Several subcortical structures have been targeted for surgical treatment of dystonia, including motor thalamus, internal segment of globus pallidus (GPi), and more recently, the subthalamic nucleus (STN). Deep brain stimulation of GPi is currently the preferred surgical treatment, but it is unclear if targeting other structures would yield better results. Patients who have already had a pallidotomy yet continue to experience dystonic symptoms may be limited in further treatment options. METHODS: A patient with medically intractable, segmental, early-onset, primary torsion dystonia presented for surgical consultation after exhausting nearly all treatment options. Medications, botulinum toxin injections, cervical denervation surgery, and left-sided pallidotomy failed to give adequate relief. The patient was implanted with STN stimulating leads bilaterally according to standard procedures. RESULTS: The patient received a 36% improvement in dystonic symptoms as measured by several dystonia rating scales. These benefits persisted for 2 years after surgery despite several hardware-related complications, and the patient reported being very satisfied with the outcome. CONCLUSION: This result supports the efficacy of STN deep brain stimulation in dystonia patients, even those with prior pallidotomy.