Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Phys Act Health ; 7 Suppl 1: S60-6, 2010 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20440014

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Recent research demonstrates the importance of targeting the built environment to support individual physical activity, particularly for people experiencing health disparities. Master plans to promote biking and/or pedestrians (BPMPs) are a potential method for environmental change. This descriptive study aims to provide a snapshot of plan attributes and better understand demographic, social and transportation characteristics of communities with BPMPs. METHODS: We collected a census sample of BPMPs from 4 states. Population and commuting data were obtained from national statistics. RESULTS: 294 master plans were included, with most plans representing municipalities. 62% of plans targeted biking only, one-fifth targeted biking and walking, and 15% targeted walking only. The sampled locations have a similar demographic profile as the overall U.S. for median age and household income, people of color, high school education, and income inequality. The degree of racial diversity of sampled communities is slightly less than the U.S. average and the percentage of people who walk to work were slightly higher. CONCLUSIONS: Given that communities with master plans have a similar profile as the overall U.S., BPMPs could feasibly be spread to communities throughout the country. Further research is planned to describe BPMPs in detail toward informing future plan development.


Subject(s)
Bicycling , City Planning , Environment Design , Motor Activity , Residence Characteristics , Walking , Adult , Aged , California , Female , Health Policy , Health Promotion , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Missouri , North Carolina , Public Health , Social Marketing , Washington , Young Adult
2.
J Phys Act Health ; 7 Suppl 1: S108-19, 2010 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20440004

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: As interventions increasingly emphasize early child care settings, it is necessary to understand the state regulatory context that provides guidelines for outdoor physical activity and safety and sets standards for child care environments. METHODS: Researchers reviewed regulations for child care facilities for 50 states, the District of Columbia and the Virgin Islands. We compared state regulations with national standards for 17 physical activity- and safety-related items for outdoor playground settings outlined in Caring for Our Children: National Health and Safety Performance Standards: Guidelines for Out-of-Home Child Care Programs (CFOC). State regulations were coded as fully, partially or not addressing the CFOC standard and state-level summary scores were calculated. RESULTS: On average, state regulations fully addressed one-third of 17 CFOC standards in regulations for centers (34%) and family child care homes (27%). Data suggest insufficient attention to outdoor play area proximity and size, equipment height, surfacing, and inspections. CONCLUSIONS: Considerable variation exists among state regulations related to physical activity promotion and injury prevention within outdoor play areas. Many states' regulations do not comply with published national health and safety standards. Enhancing regulations is one component of a policy approach to promoting safe, physically active child care settings.


Subject(s)
Caregivers/legislation & jurisprudence , Child Care/legislation & jurisprudence , Government Regulation , Motor Activity , Play and Playthings , Safety/statistics & numerical data , State Government , Caregivers/standards , Child , Child Care/standards , Child Welfare , District of Columbia , Health Promotion , Humans , United States , United States Virgin Islands , Wounds and Injuries/prevention & control
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...