Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Mol Diagn ; 20(1): 56-62, 2018 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29056575

ABSTRACT

Stool is the diagnostic specimen of choice to identify enteropathogens in pediatric gastroenteritis. However, stool collection is challenging and its diagnostic characteristics in patients with isolated vomiting are unknown. Therefore, we evaluated if oral swabs are a suitable alternative specimen to stools. In total, 738 oral swabs and 577 stool specimens were collected from 738 children with vomiting and/or diarrhea. All specimens were tested by a laboratory-developed quantitative RT-PCR Gastroenteritis Virus Panel; 150 oral swabs and 577 stool specimens were tested by the commercial gastroenteritis pathogen panel. The Gastroenteritis Virus Panel identified adenovirus (n = 38), norovirus (n = 21), and rotavirus (n = 16) commonly in oral swabs. In stool specimens, rotavirus (n = 139), norovirus (n = 86), and adenovirus (n = 69) were detected commonly. Compared with stool specimens, the specificity of oral swabs was 99% (95% CI, 96%-100%); the sensitivity of oral swabs was 18% (95% CI, 14%-22%) for the detection of enteric viruses. The Gastrointestinal Pathogen Panel identified enteric bacteria and parasites in stool but not in oral swabs. Given the lower sensitivity of oral swabs, stool remains a preferable specimen to detect enteric viruses. However, with their high specificity, oral swabs can be considered as a suitable specimen if stool specimens are unavailable. Nevertheless, negative oral swabs require a confirmative test of stool specimens.


Subject(s)
Gastroenteritis/virology , Mouth Mucosa/virology , Specimen Handling/methods , Viruses/isolation & purification , Acute Disease , Child , Diarrhea/virology , Feces/virology , Humans , Sensitivity and Specificity , Vomiting/virology
2.
Water Res ; 47(9): 3026-36, 2013 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23548566

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Surface and ground water across the world, including North America, is contaminated with bacteria resistant to antibiotics. The consumption of water contaminated with antimicrobial resistant Escherichia coli (E. coli) has been associated with the carriage of resistant E. coli in people who drink it. OBJECTIVES: To describe the proportion of drinking water samples submitted from private sources for bacteriological testing that were contaminated with E. coli resistant to antibiotics and to determine risk factors for the contamination of these water sources with resistant and multi-class resistant E. coli. METHODS: Water samples submitted for bacteriological testing in Ontario and Alberta Canada were tested for E. coli contamination, with a portion of the positive isolates tested for antimicrobial resistance. Households were invited to complete questionnaires to determine putative risk factors for well contamination. RESULTS: Using multinomial logistic regression, the risk of contamination with E. coli resistant to one or two classes of antibiotics compared to susceptible E. coli was higher for shore wells than drilled wells (odds ratio [OR] 2.8) and higher for farms housing chickens or turkeys (OR 3.0) than properties without poultry. The risk of contamination with multi-class resistant E. coli (3 or more classes) was higher if the properties housed swine (OR 5.5) or cattle (OR 2.2) than properties without these livestock and higher if the wells were located in gravel (OR 2.4) or clay (OR 2.1) than in loam. CONCLUSIONS: Housing livestock on the property, using a shore well, and having a well located in gravel or clay soil increases the risk of having antimicrobial resistant E. coli in E. coli contaminated wells. To reduce the incidence of water borne disease and the transmission of antimicrobial resistant bacteria, owners of private wells need to take measures to prevent contamination of their drinking water, routinely test their wells for contamination, and use treatments that eliminate bacteria.


Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents/pharmacology , Drinking Water/microbiology , Drug Resistance, Bacterial/drug effects , Escherichia coli/drug effects , Water Microbiology , Water Pollution/analysis , Water Supply , Canada , Drug Resistance, Microbial/drug effects , Logistic Models , Risk Factors
3.
Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol ; 23(2): e20-5, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23730315

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Human exposure to antimicrobial-resistant bacteria may result in the transfer of resistance to commensal or pathogenic microbes present in the gastrointestinal tract, which may lead to severe health consequences and difficulties in treatment of future bacterial infections. It was hypothesized that the recreational waters from beaches represent a source of antimicrobial-resistant Escherichia coli for people engaging in water activities. OBJECTIVE: To describe the occurrence of antimicrobial-resistant E coli in the recreational waters of beaches in southern Quebec. METHODS: Sampling occurred over two summers; in 2004, 674 water samples were taken from 201 beaches, and in 2005, 628 water samples were taken from 177 beaches. The minimum inhibitory concentrations of the antimicrobial-resistant E coli isolates against a panel of 16 antimicrobials were determined using microbroth dilution. RESULTS: For 2004 and 2005, respectively, 28% and 38% of beaches sampled had at least one water sample contaminated by E coli resistant to one or more antimicrobials, and more than 10% of the resistant isolates were resistant to at least one antimicrobial of clinical importance for human medicine. The three antimicrobials with the highest frequency of resistance were tetracycline, ampicillin and sulfamethoxazole. DISCUSSION: The recreational waters of these beaches represent a potential source of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria for people engaging in water activities. Investigations relating the significance of these findings to public health should be pursued.


INTRODUCTION: L'exposition humaine à des bactéries résistant aux antimicrobiens peut provoquer le transfert de la résistance à des microbes commensaux ou pathogènes présents dans le tube digestif, ce qui peut avoir de graves conséquences sur la santé et compliquer le traitement de futures infections bactériennes. On a soulevé l'hypothèse que les eaux de baignade des plages représentent une source d'infection à l'Escherichia coli résistant aux antimicrobiens pour les personnes qui s'adonnent à des activités aquatiques. La présente étude visait principalement à décrire l'occurrence d'E coli résistant aux antimicrobiens dans les eaux de baignade du sud du Québec. MÉTHODOLOGIE: Les chercheurs ont procédé à l'échantillonnage sur deux étés. En 2004, ils ont prélevé 674 échantillons d'eau sur 201 plages, et en 2005, 628 échantillons d'eau sur 177 plages. Ils ont établi les concentrations inhibitrices minimales des isolats d'E coli résistant aux antimicrobiens par rapport à un groupe de 16 antimicrobiens au moyen d'une dilution en bouillon. RÉSULTATS: En 2004 et en 2005, respectivement, 28 % et 38 % des plages échantillonnées comptaient au moins un échantillon d'eau contaminée par l'E coli résistant à au moins un antimicrobien, et plus de 10 % de ces isolats résistaient à un moins un antimicrobien d'importance clinique en médecine humaine. La tétracycline, l'ampicilline et le sulfaméthoxazole étaient les trois antimicrobiens les plus touchés par la résistance. EXPOSÉ: Les eaux de baignade de ces plages représentent une source potentielle de bactéries résistant aux antimicrobiens pour les personnes qui s'adonnent à des activités aquatiques. Il faudrait poursuivre les recherches sur la signification de ces observations en matière de santé publique.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...