Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Urology ; 185: 94-99, 2024 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38097050

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: We queried the Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) to evaluate the presentation, management, and outcomes of renal trauma in children from birth to 18 years from 2007-2018. METHODS: Patients were categorized as infants (0-1 year), toddlers (2-4 years), children (5-9 years), preteen (10-14 years), and teens (15-18 years), and patient demographics, grade of injury, and mechanism of injury including sports-related trauma (SRT) were collected. Each group was then evaluated for the level of management and patient outcome. RESULTS: We identified 3720 patients with renal trauma. Our cohort was predominantly White (68.5%), male (68.6%), and required public insurance (38.5%). Most injuries were low grade (86.7%) and managed non-operatively (94.7%). The overall mortality was 51 (1.4%). Younger patients (infants, toddlers, children) were more likely to present with complex injuries and they were more likely to have been involved in a motor vehicle accident. They had higher blood transfusion rates, longer inpatient courses, higher levels of admission acuity, and higher mortality. Patients in the older age groups presented most after SRT. Across all age groups, the most common source of SRT was limited contact sports; however, when considering only teens, full contact sports were the primary offending activity. This review of the PHIS database provides insight to the rates and patterns of pediatric renal trauma in the United States. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest an age-related differences in the presentation, management, and outcomes of pediatric renal trauma patients.


Subject(s)
Athletic Injuries , Sports , Infant , Adolescent , Child , Humans , Male , United States , Aged , Retrospective Studies , Kidney/injuries , Hospitalization , Trauma Centers , Injury Severity Score
2.
Cancer Treat Res Commun ; 25: 100209, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32979705

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Clinical guidelines have recently included renal mass biopsy (RMB) in management algorithms, especially in the setting of small renal masses ≤ 4 cm (SRM) and ablative therapy. We sought to evaluate the diagnostic rates of RMB, factors associated with a non-diagnostic biopsy, its clinical utility, and its safety profile in the setting of ablative therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 174 RMB from 167 patients, performed in a tertiary academic center from 01/2015 to 01/2019, were included. Patient demographics, radiographic mass size, RMB diagnoses, subsequent clinical management, and complications were retrospectively reviewed. RMBs were classified as diagnostic or non-diagnostic based on set criteria. RESULTS: The mean mass size was 3.0 cm (range: 0.5-15.3 cm) and 140 biopsies (80%) were SRM. Among all RMB, 159 (91%) were diagnostic and 15 (9%) were non-diagnostic. Non-diagnostic biopsies were associated with small mass size, the presence of a cystic component (p < 0.00001) and fewer number of cores submitted (p = 0.0046). All non-diagnostic biopsies occurred in SRMs, where the mean mass size was significantly smaller than diagnostic biopsies (1.3 versus 3.2 cm, p = 0.001). RMB with concurrent ablation yielded non-diagnostic results more frequently than isolated RMBs (15% vs 2%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: RMB is useful for definitive diagnosis and clinical management in the setting of ablative therapy. Small mass size, cystic lesions, and fewer number of passes obtained are associated with non-diagnostic biopsies. When a renal mass diagnosis is particularly critical, a separate biopsy procedure prior to ablative therapy is recommended.


Subject(s)
Biopsy/methods , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/surgery , Kidney Neoplasms/drug therapy , Kidney Neoplasms/surgery , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult
3.
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol ; 43(10): 1468-1473, 2020 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32613266

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Thermal ablation of small renal tumors is safe and efficacious. Thermoablation of tumors greater than 3 cm has decreased efficacy and a greater risk of complications. Combined embolization and radiofrequency ablation has shown encouraging results. We report on the use of combined single-session transarterial embolization and microwave ablation to treat large renal masses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After obtaining IRB approval, a review of the medical record between October 2016 and January 2020 was performed. Patients with renal tumors who underwent combined transarterial embolization and microwave ablation were assessed retrospectively. Patient demographic information, intraoperative, postoperative, and follow-up data were recorded. RESULTS: Eleven patients were identified meeting inclusion criteria. The mean age was 73 years, with 64% male, an average BMI of 26.5, and average Charleston Comorbidity Index of 6.7. Nine tumors were identified as clear cell carcinoma, one as papillary carcinoma and one as an oncocytic neoplasm. Average tumor size was 4.5 cm (2.7-8.3), with an average RENAL score of 8.5. Successful ablation with a 5 mm margin was achieved in all patients, and in all cases, ablation and embolization were performed on the same day. The only related post-procedure complication was a single groin hematoma. Surveillance was performed with CT or MRI. Average follow-up was 419.5 days (range 27-747), with no patients showing evidence of recurrence to date. CONCLUSIONS: Combined single-session transarterial embolization and microwave ablation is technically feasible, safe, and efficacious in treating large renal tumors in a series of 11 patients with no recurrence to date. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4, case series.


Subject(s)
Catheter Ablation , Embolization, Therapeutic , Kidney Neoplasms/therapy , Microwaves/therapeutic use , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Combined Modality Therapy , Embolization, Therapeutic/methods , Female , Humans , Kidney Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Treatment Outcome
4.
Curr Opin Urol ; 29(5): 500-504, 2019 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31261184

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review the presentation, natural history and treatment of renal cell carcinoma in children and young adults with renal cell carcinoma (RCC). RECENT FINDINGS: Complete resection of lymph nodes at the time of tumor resection can improve clinical outcomes and limit the need for adjuvant chemotherapy. Genetic alterations that lead to translocation tumors are a therapeutic target of receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors. SUMMARY: The incidence of RCC increases with age. Unlike adult patients, young patients with RCC present symptomatically and at higher stage and grade. Translocation tumors predominate RCC in children with biologic activity characterized by early spread to lymph nodes with small primary tumors. Preoperative imaging is poorly sensitive for positive lymph nodes; as such, surgeons should have a low threshold for lymph node sampling during tumor resection. Despite the advanced stage at presentation, the prognosis in children is more favorable than their adult counterparts. Complete resection of lymph nodes at the time of surgical resection improves patient prognosis. Chemotherapy targeting the PI3/AKT pathway has demonstrated clinical benefit.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell/diagnosis , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/therapy , Kidney Neoplasms/diagnosis , Kidney Neoplasms/therapy , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Child , Humans , Immunotherapy , Lymph Node Excision , Nephrectomy/methods , Prognosis , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...