Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Toxicol Mech Methods ; 15(4): 287-91, 2005.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20021094

ABSTRACT

The objective of this investigation was twofold: (1) to determine the transferable residue of imidacloprid in gloves worn while petting experimental household dogs after the application of Advantage(R) and (2) to determine the imidacloprid residue in the dog's blood. Advantage(R) contains 9.1% imidacloprid, which controls fleas on dogs for up to 30 days. Imidacloprid produces toxicity by interacting with nicotinic receptors. Advantage(R) (364 mg imidacloprid/dog) was applied topically to six household dogs. The glove and blood samples were collected at 24 h, 72 h, and then on a weekly basis for 5 weeks post-Advantage(R) application. The glove samples were collected by petting each dog for 5 minutes while wearing a different glove per dog. The blood samples (5 mL from each dog) were collected into EDTA tubes. The imidacloprid residue was determined in the blood extracts and glove samples using RP-HPLC. The highest levels of imidacloprid residues were detected at the 24-h interval in both glove (254.16 +/- 25.49 ppm) and blood (54.06 +/- 3.00 ppb) samples. The blood imidacloprid residue was reduced by one third at the 72-h interval (18.73 +/- 2.00 ppb) and was not detected after 1 week. Imidacloprid residue in the glove samples decreased approximately one third between each collection interval. The residue of imidacloprid in the glove extract by the fourth week was very low (0.08 +/- 0.02 ppm) and not detected by the fifth week. The present findings suggest that following topical application of Advantage(R), imidacloprid residue can be detected in the dog's blood for up to 72 h, and transferable residue on the dog's coat can be detected for up to 4 weeks. Repeated chronic exposure to imidacloprid may pose possible health risks to veterinarians, veterinary technologists, dog caretakers, and owners.

2.
Curr Eye Res ; 8(8): 821-34, 1989 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2791628

ABSTRACT

Quasi-elastic light scattering spectroscopy was used to non-invasively monitor affects of transient blood glucose changes on lenses of non-diabetic subjects undergoing glucose tolerance testing and diabetic subjects undergoing glucose clamping protocols. Non-diabetic subjects exhibited a characteristic biphasic change in lens protein diffusion coefficient in response to glucose loading. There was an initial rapid decrease in diffusion coefficient followed by an increase to a maximum attained approximately 30 minutes after peak blood glucose levels had been reached. The diffusion coefficients then returned to baseline values approximately 60 minutes later. These changes in diffusion coefficient in the non-diabetic lens may be related to changes in lens hydration in response to glucose loading. Diabetic subjects, in contrast, did not exhibit a marked change in diffusion coefficient in response to acute blood glucose level changes. This may be attributed to an osmotic buffering in the diabetic lens which could offset the transient changes in aqueous glucose levels.


Subject(s)
Blood Glucose/metabolism , Crystallins/metabolism , Diabetes Complications , Lens, Crystalline/metabolism , Adult , Diffusion , Humans , Middle Aged , Spectrum Analysis , Time Factors
3.
J Abnorm Child Psychol ; 5(4): 425-36, 1977 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-604382

ABSTRACT

It has been repeatedly reported that when presented with a discrimination task involving multiple cues, autistic children, as compared to normal children, tend to respond on the basis of only a restricted portion of the component cues. This phenomenon has been called "stimulus overselectivity" and has been implicated as a possible basis for some of the pronounced behavioral deficits charactertistic of autism. Examination of the results of several previous studies suggests that the overselectivity effect might be reduced with repeated exposure to testing. However, since the previous studies were not designed to test this hypothesis, no conclusions were drawn regarding variables influencing the reduction of the overselectivity phenomenon. The present investigation was therefore conducted to determine if stimulus overselectivity in autistic children is changed as a function of repeated exposure to testing. Nineteen autistic children were trained on a discrimination task with a cue complex composed of two visual cues. After the children reached criterion on the task, they were exposed to a testing phase with probe trials where the cue components were presented singly. The results indicated that 16 of the children initially showed overselectivity and 3 responded to both cues. Of the 16 children who showed overselectivity, 13 decreased their level of overselectivity with continued testing. These results are discussed in relation to variables in the testing procedure itself and to the literature on selective attention.


Subject(s)
Attention , Autistic Disorder/rehabilitation , Cues , Discrimination Learning , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Form Perception , Humans , Male , Overlearning , Practice, Psychological , Reinforcement Schedule , Visual Perception
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...