Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
CMAJ ; 189(18)2017. tab, ilus
Article in English | BIGG - GRADE guidelines | ID: biblio-946531

ABSTRACT

Guideline for opioid therapy and chronic noncancer pain: the objective is to inform the prescribing of opioids for adults with chronic noncancer pain.


Subject(s)
Humans , Chronic Pain/drug therapy , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , GRADE Approach
2.
BJOG ; 123(4): 588-97, 2016 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26542419

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether antenatal exercise in overweight/obese women would improve maternal and perinatal outcomes. DESIGN: Two-arm parallel randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Home-based intervention in Auckland, New Zealand. POPULATION AND SAMPLE: Pregnant women with body mass index ≥25 kg/m(2) . METHODS: Participants were randomised to a 16-week moderate-intensity stationary cycling programme from 20 weeks of gestation, or to a control group with no exercise intervention. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome was offspring birthweight. Perinatal and maternal outcomes were assessed, with the latter including weight gain, aerobic fitness, quality of life, pregnancy outcomes, and postnatal body composition. Exercise compliance was recorded with heart rate monitors. RESULTS: Seventy-five participants were randomised in the study (intervention 38, control 37). Offspring birthweight (adjusted mean difference 104 g; P = 0.35) and perinatal outcomes were similar between groups. Aerobic fitness improved in the intervention group compared with controls (48.0-second improvement in test time to target heart rate; P = 0.019). There was no difference in weight gain, quality of life, pregnancy outcomes or postnatal maternal body composition between groups. However, compliance with exercise protocol was poor, with an average of 33% of exercise sessions completed. Sensitivity analyses showed that greater compliance was associated with improved fitness (increased test time (P = 0.002), greater VO2 peak (P = 0.015), and lower resting heart rate (P = 0.014)), reduced postnatal adiposity (reduced fat mass (P = 0.007) and body mass index (P = 0.035)) and better physical quality of life (P = 0.034). CONCLUSIONS: Maternal non-weight-bearing moderate-intensity exercise in pregnancy improved fitness but did not affect birthweight or clinical outcomes. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Moderate-intensity exercise in overweight/obese pregnant women improved fitness but had no clinical effects.


Subject(s)
Exercise Therapy , Obesity/therapy , Overweight/therapy , Pregnant Women , Prenatal Care , Adult , Body Mass Index , Female , Humans , New Zealand/epidemiology , Obesity/epidemiology , Obesity/prevention & control , Overweight/epidemiology , Overweight/prevention & control , Patient Compliance , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Outcome , Pregnant Women/psychology , Quality of Life , Risk Reduction Behavior , Treatment Outcome , Weight Gain
3.
Genome ; 56(10): 626-33, 2013 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24237344

ABSTRACT

Including low penetrance genomic variants in population-based screening might enable personalization of screening intensity and follow up. The application of genomics in this way requires formal evaluation. Even if clinically beneficial, uptake would still depend on the attitudes of target populations. We developed a deliberative workshop on two hypothetical applications (in colorectal cancer and newborn screening) in which we applied stepped, neutrally-framed, information sets. Data were collected using nonparticipant observation, free-text comments by individual participants, and a structured survey. Qualitative data were transcribed and analyzed using thematic content analysis. Eight workshops were conducted with 170 individuals (120 colorectal cancer screening and 50 newborn screening for type 1 diabetes). The use of information sets promoted informed deliberation. In both contexts, attitudes appeared to be heavily informed by assessments of the likely validity of the test results and its personal and health care utility. Perceived benefits included the potential for early intervention, prevention, and closer monitoring while concerns related to costs, education needs regarding the probabilistic nature of risk, the potential for worry, and control of access to personal genomic information. Differences between the colorectal cancer and newborn screening groups appeared to reflect different assessments of potential personal utility, particularly regarding prevention.


Subject(s)
Attitude to Health , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/diagnosis , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Genetic Privacy/psychology , Genetic Testing , Neonatal Screening/psychology , Adult , Aged , Colorectal Neoplasms/prevention & control , Colorectal Neoplasms/psychology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/prevention & control , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/psychology , Female , Genome, Human , Genomics , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Male , Middle Aged , Penetrance , Precision Medicine/psychology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...