Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Int J Pharm ; 222(2): 191-7, 2001 Jul 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11427349

ABSTRACT

Mucosal damage due to esophageal adhesion of pharmaceuticals is a continued concern to both health care providers and drug manufacturers. As a result of this concern, dosage forms are now being designed to exhibit minimal esophageal adhesion. Previous researchers have used an in-vitro porcine esophageal model to determine the propensity for formulations to adhere to the esophagus as an alternative to human scintigraphy studies. This study used a porcine esophageal adhesion model similar to that used previously to determine the adhesiveness of placebo bisphosphonate formulations. Results are analogous to those obtained by previous researchers, with film-coated tablets showing greater adhesiveness than uncoated tablets. These same tablet formulations were also evaluated previously by a human scintigraphy study, and the results were exactly opposite of those obtained using the in-vitro porcine model. In the human scintigraphy study, the film-coated placebo risedronate tablet had a faster transit time than an uncoated round placebo tablet. In conclusion, the in-vitro porcine esophageal model is not predictive of esophageal transit in man and gamma scintigraphy is the preferred method to evaluate esophageal transit.


Subject(s)
Calcium Channel Blockers , Chemistry, Pharmaceutical , Etidronic Acid , Models, Biological , Animals , Cell Adhesion , Esophagus , Etidronic Acid/analogs & derivatives , Humans , Predictive Value of Tests , Risedronic Acid , Swine , Tablets
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...