Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Anal Toxicol ; 40(4): 255-63, 2016 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26869715

ABSTRACT

To determine the true enantiomeric composition of methamphetamine urine drug testing results, chiral separation of dextro (D) and levo (L) enantiomers is necessary. While enantiomeric separation of methamphetamine has traditionally been accomplished using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), chiral separation of D- and L-methamphetamine by chiral stationary phase (CSP) liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS) has proved more reliable. Chirally selective detection of methamphetamine by GC-MS is often performed using L-N-trifluoroacetyl-prolyl chloride (TPC). L-TPC, a chiral compound, is known to have impurities that can affect the chiral composition percentages of the methamphetamine sample, potentially leading to inaccurate patient results. The comparative analysis of the samples run by GC and LC methods showed preferential bias of the GC method for producing error rates, consistent with previous research, of 8-19%. The CSP-LC-MS-MS method produces percent deviation errors of <2%. Additionally, the GC method failed to produce results that were 100% D- or L-isomer even for enantiomerically pure standards. A higher rate of D- and L-methamphetamine isomer racemization is seen in samples when analyzed by GC-MS using L-TPC-derivatizing agent. This racemization is not seen when these samples are tested with CSP-LC-MS-MS. Thus, a more accurate method of enantiomeric analysis is provided by CSP-LC-MS-MS.


Subject(s)
Methamphetamine/isolation & purification , Calibration , Chromatography, Gas , Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid , Fluoroacetates/chemistry , Humans , Indicators and Reagents , Limit of Detection , Methamphetamine/chemistry , Methamphetamine/urine , Reproducibility of Results , Solid Phase Extraction , Stereoisomerism , Tandem Mass Spectrometry
2.
J Chromatogr A ; 1095(1-2): 113-8, 2005 Nov 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16275290

ABSTRACT

Fluorinated, silica-based stationary phases are becoming increasingly popular alternatives to traditional alkyl phases owing to their differential selectivity and retention for a variety of analyte classes. In this report, the ion-exchange mechanisms characteristic of a fluorinated phase are exploited to rapidly develop separation conditions for ephedrine alkaloids and synephrine using a mobile phase compatible with mass spectrometry. A linear relationship of basic analyte retention with the reciprocal of ammonium acetate concentration is first established. This linear relationship can then be used to optimize retention and selectivity in just two experiments. The relationship of retention with temperature is also explored. Greater retention with increasing temperature is demonstrated on the fluorinated phase at high percentages of organic modifier, which is in contrast to behavior observed in typical reversed-phase separations. The unexpected observation is explicated based on the reduction in solvent solvating power with increasing temperature. As solvation power of the mobile phase decreases, decreased solvation of both mobile phase and ionized surface groups of the stationary phase leads to stronger interactions between analyte and stationary phase. Both mobile phase ion concentration and temperature are shown to be powerful tools for the manipulation of analyte retention and selectivity.


Subject(s)
Alkaloids/isolation & purification , Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid/methods , Ephedrine/isolation & purification , Amitriptyline/isolation & purification , Berberine/isolation & purification , Ephedrine/analogs & derivatives , Fluorocarbons/chemistry , Ion Exchange , Phenylpropanolamine/isolation & purification , Synephrine/isolation & purification , Temperature
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...