Repellent and Attractant Guidance Cues Initiate Cell Migration by Distinct Rear-Driven and Front-Driven Cytoskeletal Mechanisms.

Attractive and repulsive cell guidance is essential for animal life and important in disease. Cell migration toward attractants dominates studies [1-8], but migration away from repellents is important in biology yet relatively little studied [5, 9, 10]. It is widely held that cells initiate migration by protrusion of their front [11-15], yet this has not been explicitly tested for cell guidance because cell margin displacement at opposite ends of the cell has not been distinguished for any cue. We argue that protrusion of the front, retraction of the rear, or both together could in principle break cell symmetry and start migration in response to guidance cues [16]. Here, we find in the Dictyostelium model [6] that an attractant-cAMP-breaks symmetry by causing protrusion of the front of the cell, whereas its repellent analog-8CPT-breaks symmetry by causing retraction of the rear. Protrusion of the front of these cells in response to cAMP starts with local actin filament assembly, while the delayed retraction of the rear is independent of both myosin II polarization and of motor-based contractility. On the contrary, myosin II accumulates locally in the rear of the cell in response to 8CPT, anticipating retraction and required for it, while local actin assembly is delayed and couples to delayed protrusion at the front. These data reveal an important new concept in the understanding of cell guidance.

Mechanism of cell rear retraction in migrating cells.

For decades, ever growing data on myosin II provides strong evidence that interaction of myosin-II-motor-domain with actin filaments within cells retracts the cell rear during actin-based cell migration. Now it is clear myosin II motor-activity is not the sole force involved. Alternative force-generating mechanisms within cells clearly also exist to power cell rear retraction during actin-based cell migration. Given that nematode sperm cells migrate without actin and without cytoskeletal motor proteins it is perhaps not surprising other types of force power cell rear retraction in actin-based systems. Here, cell rear retraction driven by actin filament depolymerisation, actin filament crosslinking, cell front protrusion and possibly apparent membrane tension and their importance relative to myosin II-motor-based contractility are discussed.

Actin coats and rings promote regulated exocytosis.

It is well known that actin can associate with intracellular membranes to drive endocytosis and the rocketing motion of bacteria, virions and some organelles and to regulate synaptic vesicle plasticity. Actin also has been extensively reported to be involved at several steps of exocytosis; however, it has typically been described as functioning either within the actin cortex or by providing actin tracks for organelle transport. Increasingly, actin filament coats or rings have been directly localized on the surface of the exocytic organelle. Here, we suggest a common mechanism for actin-based regulation of large secretory granules whereby organelle-associated actomyosin II contraction either directly expels secretory content or stabilizes the exocytosing organelle.

ROCK1 and ROCK2 regulate epithelial polarisation and geometric cell shape.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Cell-cell adhesion and contraction play an essential role in the maintenance of geometric shape and polarisation of epithelial cells. However, the molecular regulation of contraction during cell elongation leading to epithelial polarisation and acquisition of geometric cell shape is not clear. RESULTS: Upon induction of cell-cell adhesion, we find that human keratinocytes acquire specific geometric shapes favouring hexagons, by re-modelling junction length/orientation and thus neighbour allocation. Acquisition of geometric shape correlates temporally with epithelial polarisation, as shown by an increase in lateral height. ROCK1 and ROCK2 are important regulators of myosin II contraction, but their specific role in epithelial cell shape has not been addressed. Depletion of ROCK proteins interferes with the correct proportion of hexagonal cell shapes and full elongation of lateral domain. Interestingly, ROCK proteins are not essential for maintenance of circumferential thin bundles, the main contractile epithelial F-actin pool. Instead, ROCK1 or ROCK2 regulates thin bundle contraction and positioning along the lateral domain, an important event for the stabilisation of the elongating lateral domain. Mechanistically, E-cadherin clustering specifically leads to ROCK1/ROCK2-dependent inactivation of myosin phosphatase and phosphorylation of myosin regulatory light chain. These events correlate temporally with the increase in lateral height and thin bundle compaction towards junctions. CONCLUSION: We conclude that ROCK proteins are necessary for acquisition of elongated and geometric cell shape, two key events for epithelial differentiation.

Actin depolymerization-based force retracts the cell rear in polarizing and migrating cells.

In migrating cells, the relative importance of myosin II contractility for cell rear retraction varies [1-12]. However, in myosin II-inhibited polarizing cells, actin organization is compromised [13-18]; thus it remains unclear whether myosin II is simply required for correct actin arrangement or also directly drives rear retraction [9]. Ascaris sperm cells lack actin and associated motors, and depolymerization of major sperm protein is instead thought to pull the cell rear forward [19, 20]. Opposing views exist on whether actin could also have this function [19, 20] and has not been directly experimentally sought. We probe function at high temporal resolution in polarizing fibroblasts that establish migration by forming the cell rear first [9, 15, 21]. We show that in cells with correctly organized actin, that actin filament depolymerization directly drives retraction of the rear margin to polarize cells and spatially accounts for most cell rear retraction during established migration. Myosin II contractility is required early, to form aligned actin bundles that are needed for polarization, and also later to maintain bundle length that ensures directed protrusion at the cell front. Our data imply a new mechanism: actin depolymerization-based force retracts the cell rear to polarize cells with no direct contribution from myosin II contractility.

Actomyosin II contractility expels von Willebrand factor from Weibel-Palade bodies during exocytosis.

The study of actin in regulated exocytosis has a long history with many different results in numerous systems. A major limitation on identifying precise mechanisms has been the paucity of experimental systems in which actin function has been directly assessed alongside granule content release at distinct steps of exocytosis of a single secretory organelle with sufficient spatiotemporal resolution. Using dual-color confocal microscopy and correlative electron microscopy in human endothelial cells, we visually distinguished two sequential steps of secretagogue-stimulated exocytosis: fusion of individual secretory granules (Weibel-Palade bodies [WPBs]) and subsequent expulsion of von Willebrand factor (VWF) content. Based on our observations, we conclude that for fusion, WPBs are released from cellular sites of actin anchorage. However, once fused, a dynamic ring of actin filaments and myosin II forms around the granule, and actomyosin II contractility squeezes VWF content out into the extracellular environment. This study therefore demonstrates how discrete actin cytoskeleton functions within a single cellular system explain actin filament-based prevention and promotion of specific exocytic steps during regulated secretion.

Forming the cell rear first: breaking cell symmetry to trigger directed cell migration.

Directed cell migration requires the breaking of cell symmetry to generate a cell front and a cell rear along an axis approximately aligned with the direction of locomotion. In most cell types, regulated actin polymerization promotes initial cell front formation and its subsequent persistent protrusion, whereas myosin II-based forces are required to initially create and then maintain the cell rear. Molecular models for cell migration have focused extensively on cell protrusion, and the breaking of cell symmetry is almost universally portrayed with the cell front forming first. Although data supports this model for cells moving towards chemo-attractants, in the absence of any guidance cue, cell symmetry is broken by the cells constitutively forming the cell rear first. This allows an alternative model for triggering cell migration starting with retraction at the back of the cell. In this model, actomyosin II activity within the cell body and prospective cell rear occurs before a spatial bias in actin polymerization at the cell front. Creating the cell rear first may be a useful tool employed by a wide-range of migrating cell types, particularly when moving away from repellent cues.

Graded actin filament polarity is the organization of oriented actomyosin II filament bundles required for fibroblast polarization.

Actomyosin II filament assemblies in cells are required for shaping the cell body and forming the cell rear during morphological polarization and triggering of migration. However, precise steps in myosin II-based mechanisms are unknown in this event; one reason is due to lack of information on the organization of the actin filament substrate for myosin II. Whilst muscle sarcomeric-like contraction drives cell tension in stationary nonmuscle cells, alternative nonsarcomeric modes of myosin II force-generation power forwards movement of the cell body in already migrating cells. Which one contributes to initial cell shape change has not previously been experimentally sought in any polarizing cell. Sarcomeric and nonsarcomeric-based force require completely different types of organization and filament polarity in the actin substrate for myosin II, and these can only currently be distinguished by labour-intensive submicron analysis and electron microscopy. For the first time in any polarizing cell using such analysis we have identified that oriented actomyosin II filament bundles, required for fibroblast polarization, are nonsarcomeric and are organized with graded filament polarity. As this actin organization is similar to the organization in already migrating fibroblasts, we conclude that graded filament polarity is a pivotal myosin II substrate coordinating initial cell shape change and triggering of migration.

Retrograde flow and myosin II activity within the leading cell edge deliver F-actin to the lamella to seed the formation of graded polarity actomyosin II filament bundles in migrating fibroblasts.

In migrating fibroblasts actomyosin II bundles are graded polarity (GP) bundles, a distinct organization to stress fibers. GP bundles are important for powering cell migration, yet have an unknown mechanism of formation. Electron microscopy and the fate of photobleached marks show actin filaments undergoing retrograde flow in filopodia, and the lamellipodium are structurally and dynamically linked with stationary GP bundles within the lamella. An individual filopodium initially protrudes, but then becomes separated from the tip of the lamellipodium and seeds the formation of a new GP bundle within the lamella. In individual live cells expressing both GFP-myosin II and RFP-actin, myosin II puncta localize to the base of an individual filopodium an average 28 s before the filopodium seeds the formation of a new GP bundle. Associated myosin II is stationary with respect to the substratum in new GP bundles. Inhibition of myosin II motor activity in live cells blocks appearance of new GP bundles in the lamella, without inhibition of cell protrusion in the same timescale. We conclude retrograde F-actin flow and myosin II activity within the leading cell edge delivers F-actin to the lamella to seed the formation of new GP bundles.

ADF/cofilin family proteins control formation of oriented actin-filament bundles in the cell body to trigger fibroblast polarization.

How formation of the front and rear of a cell are coordinated during cell polarization in migrating cells is not well understood. Time-lapse microscopy of live primary chick embryo heart fibroblasts expressing GFP-actin show that, prior to cell polarization, polymerized actin in the cell body reorganizes to form oriented actin-filament bundles spanning the entire cell body. Within an average of 5 minutes of oriented actin bundles forming, localized cell-edge retraction initiates at either the side or at one end of the newly formed bundles and then elaborates around the nearest end of the bundles to form the cell rear, the first visual break in cell symmetry. Localized net protrusion occurs at the opposing end of the bundles to form the cell front and lags formation of the rear of the cell. Consequently, cells acquire full polarity and start to migrate in the direction of the long axis of the bundles, as previously documented for already migrating cells. When ADF/cofilin family protein activity or actin-filament disassembly is specifically blocked during cell polarization, reorganization of polymerized actin to form oriented actin-filament bundles in the cell body fails, and formation of the cell rear and front is inhibited. We conclude that formation of oriented actin-filament bundles in the cell body requires ADF/cofilin family proteins, and is an early event needed to coordinate the spatial location of the cell rear and front during fibroblast polarization.

Actin at cell-cell junctions is composed of two dynamic and functional populations.

The ability of epithelial cells to polarize requires cell-cell adhesion mediated by cadherin receptors. During cell-cell contact, the mechanism via which a flat, spread cell shape is changed into a tall, cuboidal epithelial morphology is not known. We found that cadherin-dependent adhesion modulates actin dynamics by triggering changes in actin organization both locally at junctions and within the rest of the cell. Upon induction of cell-cell contacts, two spatial actin populations are distinguishable: junctional actin and peripheral thin bundles. With time, the relative position of these two populations changes and becomes indistinguishable to form a cortical actin ring that is characteristic of mature, fully polarized epithelial cells. Junctional actin and thin actin bundles differ in their actin dynamics and mechanism of formation, and interestingly, have distinct roles during epithelial polarization. Whereas junctional actin stabilizes clustered cadherin receptors at cell-cell contacts, contraction of peripheral actin bundle is essential for an increase in the maximum height at the lateral domain during polarization (cuboidal morphology). Thus, both junctional actin and thin bundles are necessary, and cooperate with each other to generate a polarized epithelial morphology.

Myosin II-dependent cortical movement is required for centrosome separation and positioning during mitotic spindle assembly.

The role of myosin II in mitosis is generally thought to be restricted to cytokinesis. We present surprising new evidence that cortical myosin II is also required for spindle assembly in cells. Drug- or RNAi-mediated disruption of myosin II in cells interferes with normal spindle assembly and positioning. Time-lapse movies reveal that these treatments block the separation and positioning of duplicated centrosomes after nuclear envelope breakdown (NEBD), thereby preventing the migration of the microtubule asters to opposite sides of chromosomes. Immobilization of cortical movement with tetravalent lectins produces similar spindle defects to myosin II disruption and suggests that myosin II activity is required within the cortex. Latex beads bound to the cell surface move in a myosin II-dependent manner in the direction of the separating asters. We propose that after NEBD, completion of centrosome separation and positioning around chromosomes depends on astral microtubule connections to a moving cell cortex.

ADF/cofilin controls cell polarity during fibroblast migration.

To migrate, normally a cell must establish morphological polarity and continuously protrude a single lamellipodium, polarized in the direction of migration. We have previously shown that actin filament disassembly is necessary for protrusion of the lamellipodium during fibroblast migration. As ADF/cofilin (AC) proteins are essential for the catalysis of filament disassembly in cells, we assessed their role in polarized lamellipodium protrusion in migrating fibroblasts. We compared the spatial distribution of AC and the inactive, phosphorylated AC (pAC) in migrating cells. AC, but not pAC, localized to the lamellipodium. To investigate a role for AC in cell polarity, we increased the proportion of pAC in migrating fibroblasts by overexpressing constitutively active (CA) LIM kinase 1. In 87% of cells expressing CA LIM kinase, cell polarity was abolished. In such cells, the single polarized lamellipodium was replaced by multiple nonpolarized lamellipodia, which, in contrast to nonexpressing migrating cells, stained for pAC. Cell polarity was rescued by coexpressing an active, nonphosphorylatable Xenopus AC (CA XAC) with the CA LIMK. Furthermore, overexpressing a pseudophosphorylated (less active) XAC by itself also abolished cell polarity. We conclude that locally maintaining ADF/cofilin in the active, nonphosphorylated state within the lamellipodium is necessary to maintain polarized protrusion during cell migration.

Ena/Vasp: solving a cell motility paradox.

Modulating the concentration of the actin-binding protein Ena/Vasp within the lamellipodium of a migrating fibroblast results in marked changes in lamellipodium behaviour and actin network organization at the cell's leading edge. This can explain a cell motility paradox.