The association of body mass index with safety and effectiveness of first-line carboplatin-based chemotherapy in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Carboplatin is an anticancer drug used for treatment of various types of cancer including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Dosing is based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) using the Cockcroft-Gault formula. In overweight patients, the GFR is more likely overestimated, resulting in a potentially overdose of carboplatin affecting treatment response. This study investigated the association of body mass index (BMI) on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in stage-IV NSCLC patients treated with first-line carboplatin-based chemotherapy. Secondary safety endpoints were thrombocytopenia and toxicity-related hospitalizations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective multicenter cohort study. Patients were categorized according to BMI<25.0 kg/m2 (normal weight and reference), 25.0-29.9 kg/m2 (overweight) or ≥30.0 kg/m2 (obese). For survival analyses adjusted hazard ratios [aHR] were calculated using multivariate Cox regression analysis. Secondary outcomes were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression providing adjusted odd ratios [aOR]. RESULTS: Overweight patients (n=174) had a significantly better OS (aHR=0.72, 95%-CI:0.59-0.89) and PFS (aHR=0.74, 95%-CI:0.61-0.90) compared to normal weight patients (n=268). OS nor PFS were different in obese (n=51) compared to normal weight patients. However, obesity was associated with significantly higher incidences of thrombocytopenia grade ≥3 (aOR=3.47, 95%-CI:1.75-6.90). CONCLUSION: This study shows a significantly longer survival for overweight compared to normal weight patients. Obese patients have an increased risk for grade ≥3 thrombocytopenia without a difference in survival following carboplatin-based chemotherapy. The implications for clinical practice are to use the Cockcroft-Gault formula with caution in patients with BMI≥30.0 kg/m2, and to verify calculated dosing of carboplatin for appropriateness.

Individual patient data to allow a more elaborated comparison of trial results with real-world outcomes from first-line immunotherapy in NSCLC.

BACKGROUND: Many studies have compared real-world clinical outcomes of immunotherapy in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with reported outcomes data from pivotal trials. However, any differences observed could be only limitedly explored further for causation because of the unavailability of individual patient data (IPD) from trial participants. The present study aims to explore the additional benefit of comparison with IPD. METHODS: This study compares progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of metastatic NSCLC patients treated with second line nivolumab in real-world clinical practice (n = 141) with IPD from participants in the Checkmate-057 clinical trial (n = 292). Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used to construct HRs for real-world practice versus clinical trial. RESULTS: Real-world patients were older (64 vs. 61 years), had more often ECOG PS ≥ 2 (5 vs. 0%) and were less often treated with subsequent anti-cancer treatment (28.4 vs. 42.5%) compared to trial patients. The median PFS in real-world patients was longer (3.84 (95%CI: 3.19-5.49) vs 2.30 (2.20-3.50) months) and the OS shorter than in trial participants (8.25 (6.93-13.2) vs. 12.2 (9.90-15.1) months). Adjustment with available patient characteristics, led to a shift in the hazard ratio (HR) for OS, but not for PFS (HRs from 1.13 (0.88-1.44) to 1.07 (0.83-1.38), and from 0.82 (0.66-1.03) to 0.79 (0.63-1.00), respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This study is an example how IPD from both real-world and trial patients can be applied to search for factors that could explain an efficacy-effectiveness gap. Making IPD from clinical trials available to the international research community allows this.