Moral economy and moral capital: A new approach to understanding health systems.

Healthcare systems can be considered moral economies in which moral capital in the form of expectations toward norms, values, and virtues are exchanged and traded. Moral capital, as a concept, is an extension of Bourdieu's forms of symbolic, and in particular, cultural capital. This research set out to identify forms of moral capital evident in the accounts of health professionals and patients within the distinctive healthcare systems of Germany, New Zealand, and the Unites States. Here, we provide an overview of 15 forms of moral capital that were identified. An important form of moral capital is equality. The global coronavirus pandemic has illuminated inequalities in healthcare systems across the world. We suggest considering moral capital as a useful tool to reform healthcare systems and make the provision of healthcare a more equitable enterprise.

Socio-demographic profile of medical students in Aotearoa, New Zealand (2016-2020): a nationwide cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the socio-demographic profile of all students enrolled to study medicine in Aotearoa New Zealand (NZ). DESIGN AND SETTING: Observational, cross-sectional study. Data were sought from the Universities of Auckland and Otago, the two NZ tertiary education institutions providing medical education, for the period 2016-2020 inclusive. These data are a subset of the larger project 'Mirror on Society' examining all regulated health professional enrolled students in NZ. VARIABLES OF INTEREST: gender, citizenship, ethnicity, rural classification, socioeconomic deprivation, school type and school socioeconomic scores. NZ denominator population data (18-29 years) were sourced from the 2018 census. PARTICIPANTS: 2858 students were enrolled to study medicine between 2016 and 2020 inclusive. RESULTS: There were more women (59.1%) enrolled to study medicine than men (40.9%) and the majority (96.5%) were in the 18-29 years age range. Maori students (rate ratio 0.92; 95% CI 0.84 to 1.0) and Pacific students (rate ratio 0.85; 95% CI 0.73 to 0.98) had lower overall rates of enrolment. For all ethnic groups, irrespective of rural or urban origin, enrolment rates had a nearly log-linear negative relationship with increasing socioeconomic deprivation. Enrolments were lower for students from rural areas compared with those from urban areas (rate ratio 0.53; 95% CI 0.46-0.61). Overall NZ's medical students do not reflect the diverse communities they will serve, with under-representation of Maori and Pacific students and students who come from low socioeconomic and rural backgrounds. CONCLUSIONS: To meaningfully address these issues, we suggest the following policy changes: universities commit and act to Indigenise institutional ways of knowing and being; selection policies are reviewed to ensure that communities in greatest need of doctors are prioritised for enrolment into medicine (specifically, the impact of low socioeconomic status should be factored into selection decisions); and the government fund more New Zealanders to study medicine.

What is affirmative action in tertiary education? An overview of affirmative action policies in health professional programmes, drawing on experience from Aotearoa and overseas.

Both the universities of Auckland and Otago have had affirmative selection policies for entry into health profession programmes for a number of decades. These policies have been created and strengthened as a result of the leadership and advocacy of Maori leaders, academics and communities. The aims of this paper are to: 1) define affirmative action and outline the rationale for affirmative policies, 2) give examples of how affirmative action policies have been implemented in Aotearoa, and 3) give examples of legal challenges to affirmative action drawing on international experience. Affirmative action policies for health professional programmes are a strategy for improving equity in health through raising the participation of members of population groups that have been historically excluded or under-represented. There are a range of arguments in favour of affirmative policies: constitutional obligations related to Te Tiriti o Waitangi; health professionals from under-represented communities are more likely to serve their communities; they help address biases in healthcare delivery, thereby improving the quality of care; they contribute to health equity through the impact their careers have on the education of others; they are more likely to focus their research on communities they serve and engage with; and their leadership has the potential to benefit the entire system. Legal challenges to affirmative action have been common in some overseas jurisdictions and have resulted in some instances in weaker, or absent, affirmative action policies. We conclude that strong affirmative action policies in tertiary health profession programme admissions contribute to achieving health equity. While much of the literature focusses on admissions to medical programmes, the principles of affirmative action apply equally to all health profession (and other) programmes in Aotearoa.

Inclusive medical education for students with disabilities: a new guidance document from Medical Deans Australia and New Zealand.

This paper outlines: 1) the work undertaken by Medical Deans Australia and New Zealand (MDANZ) to review and update its 2017 guidelines related to selecting and supporting students with disabilities, and 2) the resulting new recommendations. The review group considered common approaches to supporting medical students with a disability through an inclusive, strengths-based lens. The outcome was a guidance document that centres the importance of a strengths-based and inclusive culture within medical schools, and emphasises an individualised, context-specific and inclusive approach based on early, open dialogue. Strong project governance and broad consultation were critical to achieving this outcome. As social norms and technologies evolve, regular re-examination of guidance on how to support potential or current medical students with a disability will be necessary.

The ownership elephant is becoming a mammoth: a policy focus on ownership is needed to transform Aotearoa New Zealand's health system.

Explicit government policy about ownership of health services is an important yet missing element in Aotearoa New Zealand's health system. Policy has not systematically addressed ownership as a health system policy tool since the late 1930s. It is timely to revisit ownership amid health system reform and increasing reliance on private provision (for-profit companies), notably for primary and community care, and also as an integral part of digitalisation. Simultaneously, policy should recognise the importance and potential of both the third sector (NGOs, Pasifika, community-owned services), Maori ownership and direct government provision of services to address health equity. Iwi-led developments over recent decades, along with the establishment of the Te Aka Whai Ora (Maori Health Authority), and Iwi Maori Partnership Boards provide opportunities for emerging Indigenous models of health service ownership, more consistent with Te Tiriti o Waitangi and matauranga Maori. Four ownership types relevant to health service provision and equity are briefly explored: private for-profit, NGOs and community, government and Maori. These ownership domains operate differently in practice and over time, influencing service design, utilisation and health outcomes. Overall, the New Zealand state should take a deliberate strategic view of ownership as a policy instrument, in particular because of its relevance to health equity.

National cross-sectional study of the sociodemographic characteristics of Aotearoa New Zealand's regulated health workforce pre-registration students: a mirror on society?

OBJECTIVES: To provide a sociodemographic profile of students enrolled in their first year of a health professional pre-registration programme offered within New Zealand (NZ) tertiary institutions. DESIGN: Observational, cross-sectional study. Data were sought from NZ tertiary education institutions for all eligible students accepted into the first 'professional' year of a health professional programme for the 5-year period 2016-2020 inclusive. VARIABLES OF INTEREST: gender, citizenship, ethnicity, rural classification, socioeconomic deprivation, school type and school socioeconomic scores. Analyses were carried out using the R statistics software. SETTING: Aotearoa NZ. PARTICIPANTS: All students (domestic and international) accepted into the first 'professional' year of a health professional programme leading to registration under the Health Practitioners Competence Assurance Act 2003. RESULTS: NZ's health workforce pre-registration students do not reflect the diverse communities they will serve in several important dimensions. There is a systematic under-representation of students who identify as Maori and Pacific, and students who come from low socioeconomic and rural backgrounds. The enrolment rate for Maori students is about 99 per 100 000 eligible population and for some Pacific ethnic groups is lower still, compared with 152 per 100 000 for NZ European students. The unadjusted rate ratio for enrolment for both Maori students and Pacific students versus 'NZ European and Other' students is approximately 0.7. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend that: (1) there should be a nationally coordinated system for collecting and reporting on the sociodemographic characteristics of the health workforce pre-registration; (2) mechanisms be developed to allow the agencies that fund tertiary education to base their funding decisions directly on the projected health workforce needs of the health system and (3) tertiary education funding decisions be based on Te Tiriti o Waitangi (the foundational constitutional agreement between the Indigenous people, Maori and the British Crown signed in 1840) and have a strong pro-equity focus.

Assessing need for primary care services: analysis of New Zealand Health Survey data.

Introduction The 2001 Primary Health Care Strategy provided significant new government funding for primary care (general practice and related services) via capitation funding formulas. However, there remain important unanswered questions about how capitation funding formulas should be redesigned to ensure equitable and sustainable service provision to all population groups. Aim To compare levels of chronic illness, utilisation, and unmet need in patients categorised as 'high-need' with those categorised as non-'high-need' using the definitions that are used in the current funding context, in order to inform primary care funding formula design. Methods Respondents of the New Zealand Health Survey (2018-19) were categorised into 'high-need' and non-'high-need', as defined in current funding formulas. We analysed: (i) presence, and number, of chronic diseases; (ii) self-reported primary care utilisation (previous 12 months); and (iii) self-reported unmet need for primary care (previous 12 months). Analyses used integrated survey weights to account for survey design. Results In total, 29% of respondents were 'high-need', of whom 50.2% reported one or more chronic conditions (vs 47.8% of non-'high-need' respondents). 'High-need' respondents were more likely than non-'high-need' respondents to: report three or more chronic conditions (14.4% vs 13.7%); visit a general practitioner more often (seven or more visits per year: 9.9% vs 6.6%); and report barriers to care. Discussion There is an urgent need for further quantification of the funding requirements of general practices serving high proportions of 'high-need' patients in order to ensure their viability, sustainability and the provision of quality of care.

Selection of Maori students into medicine: re-imagining merit. Exploring some of the sociological reasons that might explain the exclusion of Maori from the medical workforce.

This paper aims to describe a number of sociological and theoretical foundations that underpin selection into tertiary health education in New Zealand and that have historically served to limit the participation of Maori students in restricted-entry health professional programmes. It further describes practical steps that can be taken to promote pro-equity changes within tertiary institutions. First, we discuss the sociological concept of meritocracy as a dominant approach to student selection and pedagogy in universities, and we describe the consequences of this approach for Maori students. Second, we discuss the concepts of white supremacy and privilege as two organising sets of values that interplay with each other and shape the tertiary environment. Third, we discuss possible alternative theoretical and ethical approaches based on Rawls' theory of justice, mana motuhake and strengths-based assumptions. Finally, we illustrate these alternative approaches, which are fundamentally committed to Te Tiriti o Waitangi, with an example of their successful application.

Empowering equity: Striving for socio-economic equity in the Aotearoa New Zealand health workforce.

BACKGROUND: The lack of diversity in the health workforce is partly due to selection criteria for health professional programmes that have not selected students from a wide range of backgrounds. Consequently, health care professionals from minority groups and lower socio-economic backgrounds are under-represented in the workforce. APPROACH: The Socioeconomic Equity (EQ) support programme aims to increase the participation, retention and academic success of students from low socio-economic communities studying in health professional programmes at the University of Otago. At the start of the academic year, students who had attended a secondary school from a low socio-economic community were invited to take part in the EQ Programme. This includes group workshops on study skills, guidance from peer mentors, subject specific academic support, one-on-one course advice and pastoral support and activities to enhance self-esteem and self-efficacy. EVALUATION: Comparing the first two years of the EQ project with the previous year, there was an increase in the percentage of students from schools in low socio-economic communities that passed HSFY. It was also found that more EQ students were offered places in health professional programmes than in the previous year. IMPLICATIONS: The percentage of students passing HSFY has increased, and importantly, the percentage of students from low socio-economic backgrounds entering professional health programmes has doubled. This is a small start to building a health workforce that fairly reflects people from all communities.

Emergency COVID-19 funding to general practices in early 2020: lessons for future allocation to support equity.

AIM: To (1) describe the distribution of Ministry of Health (MOH) COVID-19 emergency funding to general practices in March and April 2020 and (2) consider whether further funding to general practices should be allocated differently to support equity for patients. METHODS: Emergency funding allocation criteria and funding amounts by general practice were obtained from the MOH. Practices were stratified according to their proportion of high-needs enrolled patients (Maori, Pacific or living in an area with the highest quintile of socioeconomic deprivation). Funding per practice was calculated for separate and total payments according to practice stratum of high-needs enrolled patients. RESULTS: The median combined March and April funding for general practices with 80% high-needs patients was 28% higher per practice ($36,674 vs $28,686) and 48% higher per patient ($10.50 vs $7.11) compared with the funding received by general practices with fewer than 20% high-needs patients. Although the March allocation did increase funding for high-needs patients, the April allocation did not. CONCLUSIONS: Emergency support funding for general practices was organised by the MOH at short notice and in exceptional circumstances. In the future, the MOH should apply pro-equity resource allocation in all emergencies, as with other circumstances.

Do financial barriers to access to primary health care increase the risk of poor health? Longitudinal evidence from New Zealand.

Primary health care policies in New Zealand, as in many countries, have focused on reducing barriers to access. Financial barriers to obtaining timely health care, while not the only important barriers, are amongst the most important, and are amenable to policy reforms. There is little robust empirical evidence about the extent to which cost related barriers are associated with adverse health outcomes. Past evidence is limited to cross-sectional studies of selected groups, selected primary health care services, and to cross-sectional studies that are susceptible to unmeasured confounding bias. Using fixed effects regression modelling and data from 17,363 participants with at least two observations in three waves (2004-05, 2006-07, 2008-09) of the SoFIE-Health panel data, this study examines the impact of financial barriers to access to primary health care (general practitioner and dentist) on health status using a longitudinal national panel study of adult New Zealanders. Self-rated health (SRH), physical health (PCS) and mental health summary scores (MCS) were the health measures. The two exposures were: not seeing 1) the doctor and 2) the dentist because of cost at least once during the preceding 12 months. We also tested for interactions between the exposure (deferral of care) and age, gender, ethnicity and three health outcomes. For all outcomes, after adjusting for time-varying confounders, health deteriorated as the number of waves increased in which a non-visit was reported. Moreover, the effect size for any health deterioration was greater for deferring a dentist visit than for deferring a physician visit. Except gender and age (for MCS and doctor visits), and gender and ethnicity (for SRH and dentist visits) we did not find any evidence of interactions. These results support policy responses focussed on decreasing financial barriers to access. In the New Zealand context this finding is particularly important for dental care.

Rethinking workforce planning for integrated care: using scenario analysis to facilitate policy development.

BACKGROUND: A goal of health workforce planning is to have the most appropriate workforce available to meet prevailing needs. However, this is a difficult task when considering integrated care, as future workforces may require different numbers, roles and skill mixes than those at present. With this uncertainty and large variations in what constitutes integrated care, current health workforce policy and planning processes are poorly placed to respond. In order to address this issue, we present a scenario-based workforce planning approach. METHODS: We propose a novel mixed methods design, incorporating content analysis, scenario methods and scenario analysis through the use of a policy Delphi. The design prescribes that data be gathered from workforce documents and studies that are used to develop scenarios, which are then assessed by a panel of suitably qualified people. Assessment consists of evaluating scenario desirability, feasibility and validity and includes a process for indicating policy development opportunities. RESULTS: We confirmed our method using data from New Zealand's Older Persons Health sector and its workforce. Three scenarios resulted, one that reflects a normative direction and two alternatives that reflect key sector workforce drivers and trends. One of these, based on alternative assumptions, was found to be more desirable by the policy Delphi panel. The panel also found a number of favourable policy proposals. CONCLUSIONS: The method shows that through applying techniques that have been developed to accommodate uncertainty, health workforce planning can benefit when confronting issues associated with integrated care. The method contributes to overcoming significant weaknesses of present health workforce planning approaches by identifying a wider range of plausible futures and thematic kernels for policy development. The use of scenarios provides a means to contemplate future situations and provides opportunities for policy rehearsal and reflection.

The ongoing evolution of capitation funding for primary care: the December 2018 PHO capitation funding changes for Community Services Card holders.

AIM: To 1) consider the possible impact on equity of the recent policy to support people on low incomes to access primary care using the Community Services Card (CSC), and 2) identify questions that will need to be answered in order for the policy and funding changes to be evaluated. METHODS: Review of publicly accessible reports, papers, media releases and websites to detail and examine the funding changes made in December 2018 to implement the CSC policy. RESULTS: CSC possession is an important new determinant of eligibility to low-cost access to primary care for many people. As the funding changes are complex, the equity effects cannot be fully understood until further detailed modelling is carried out, and specific questions are answered. CONCLUSIONS: The December 2018 PHO capitation funding policy changes represent a further step towards universal low-cost primary healthcare. The effects of those funding changes should now be evaluated in order to understand their effects on equity. It is the responsibility of the Ministry of Health to ensure that an evaluation of the changes takes place.

The 'elephants in the room' for New Zealand's health system in its 80th anniversary year: general practice charges and ownership models.

The 2018 year signalled the 80th anniversary of the Social Security Act 1938. In order to implement this legislation, a historic compromise between the government and the medical profession created institutional arrangements for the New Zealand health system that endure to this day. The 2018 year also marked the commencement of a Ministerial review of the New Zealand health system. This article considers two intertwined arrangements which stem from the post-1938 compromise that the Ministerial review will need to address if goals of equity and, indeed, the original intent of the 1938 legislation are to be delivered upon: general practice patient charges; and ownership models. It describes the problems patient charges create, and options for ownership that the Ministerial review might contemplate.