ABSTRACT
Laurel wilt, caused by Raffaelea lauricola, threatens native and nonnative species in the Lauraceae in the southeastern United States, including the important commercial crop, avocado, Persea americana (2,4). Although the pathogen's vector, Xyleborus glabratus, was detected in Miami-Dade County, FL in January 2010, laurel wilt had not been reported (4). In February 2011, symptoms of the disease were observed on native swampbay, P. palustris, in Miami-Dade County (25°72'N, 80°48'W). Externally, foliage was brown, necrotic, and did not abscise; internally, sapwood was streaked with dark gray-to-bluish discoloration; and, in dead trees, holes of natal galleries of the vector from which columns of frass were attached were evident. On a semiselective medium for R. lauricola, a fungus with the pathogen's phenotype was isolated from symptomatic sapwood. Colonies were slow growing, light cream in color, with dendritic, closely appressed mycelium and often a slimy surface. A representative strain of the fungus was further identified with PCR primers for diagnostic small subunit (SSU) rDNA (1) and its SSU sequence (100% match, GenBank Accession No. JN578863). In each of two experiments, plants of 'Simmonds' avocado, the most important cultivar in Florida, were inoculated with three strains of the fungus, as described previously (3). Symptoms of laurel wilt developed in all inoculated plants and the fungus was recovered from each. After aerial and further ground surveys, additional symptomatic swampbay trees, some of which had defoliated, were detected in the vicinity of the original site. Since swampbay defoliates only a year or more after symptoms develop (4), the 2010 detection of X. glabratus may have coincided with an undetected presence of the disease. As of July 2011, a 6-km-diameter disease focus was evident in the area, the southernmost edge of which is 5 km from the nearest commercial avocado orchard. In August 2011, a dooryard avocado tree immediately north of the above focus was affected by laurel wilt, and an SSU sequence confirmed the involvement of R. lauricola (GenBank Accession No. JN613280). The outbreak of laurel wilt in Miami-Dade County represents a 150 km southerly jump in the distribution of this disease in the United States ( http://www.fs.fed.us/r8/foresthealth/laurelwilt/dist_map.shtml ) and is the first time this disease has been found in close proximity to Florida's primary commercial avocado production area. Approximately 98% of the state's commercial avocados, worth nearly $54 million per year, are produced in Miami-Dade County. Since effective fungicidal and insecticidal measures have not been developed for large, fruit-bearing trees, mitigation efforts will focus on the rapid identification and destruction of infected trees (3,4). References: (1) T. J. Dreaden et al. Phytopathology 98:S48, 2008. (2) S. W. Fraedrich et al. Plant Dis. 92:215, 2008. (3) R. C. Ploetz et al. Plant Dis. 95:977, 2011. (4) R. C. Ploetz et al. Recovery Plan for Laurel Wilt of Avocado. National Plant Disease Recovery System, USDA, ARS, 2011.
ABSTRACT
Pitahaya (Hylocereus undatus (Haw.) Britton & Rose), a cactus grown for its edible fruit, is gaining popularity in South Florida as part of the specialty tropical fruit market. In July 2009, flowers and fruit were discovered with an uncharacterized rot. Small, circular, light brown, depressed lesions expanded to form large areas of rot on flowers and fruit in 7 to 10 days. The lesions produced large amounts of dark fungal spores. Single-spore isolates were identified morphologically and by aligning internal transcribed spacer (ITS) and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (gpd) DNA sequences from the isolates with previously published sequences of Bipolaris, Drechslera, and Cochliobolus species. Conidia from the dark, blackish brown colonies were formed at the tips of pale golden brown, straight to flexuous conidiophores, 99 (184) 313 × 3 (6) 8 µm and slightly swollen at the apex and base. Conidia were pale-to-medium golden brown, smooth and clavate with a protuberant hilum, 24 (40) 51 × 9 (10) 13 µm, and two to four distoseptate. The isolates closely match descriptions of Bipolaris cactivora (= Drechslera cactivora) (3,4), although isolates from pitahaya had smaller conidia (30 to 65 µm) than previously reported. Conidial characteristics from a B. cactivora herbarium specimen BPI 431621 (U.S. National Fungus Collections) closely matched (29 (36) 50 × 8 (9) 11 µm, two to four distoseptate) our isolates. ITS (GenBank Accession Nox. HM598677-79) sequences aligned most closely (99.7% homology) with another B. cactivora isolate from China (GU390882), and both ITS and gpd (GenBank Accession Nos. HM598680-82) sequences indicate a close relationship to Bipolaris indica. Wounded or nonwounded mature pitahaya fruit and mature stems were inoculated with either a mycelia plug or a 15-µl 0.3% agar drop containing 105 conidia ml-1. Lesion diameters were measured after 7 days at 25°C, the fungus was reisolated on potato dextrose agar (PDA) and its identity was confirmed. Mean lesion diameters on mature fruit were 6.0 to 10.8 mm, depending on the inoculation method, and sporulation began 6 days after inoculation. On mature plant stems, wound-inoculated treatments formed 1.8 to 3.4 mm lesions, but nonwounded inoculations and controls were negative. Lesions were light tan, circular, and did not sporulate. To our knowledge, this is the first report of fruit rot caused by B. cactivora on pitahaya in Florida. The same pathogen causes stem rot of the Cactaceae in Europe and the United States (2) and a fruit rot on pitahaya in Japan (4). In Florida, it has been reported as causing a leaf spot on Portulaca oleracea (1). Our results indicate that B. cactivora causes flower and fruit rot on pitahaya, but does not seriously affect mature plant stems. The flower rot does not appear to significantly increase incidence but may provide inoculum for the fruit rot. The high incidence of fruit rot affecting commercial operations in Miami-Dade County over the past 2 years requires an effective disease management strategy. References: (1) S. A. Alfieri, Jr. et al. Bull. 14. Index of Plant Diseases in Florida (Revised). Florida Dep. Agric. Consumer Serv., Div. Plant Ind., 1984. (2) R. D. Durbin et al. Phytopathology 45:509, 1955. (3) M. B. Ellis. Page 432 in: Dematiaceous Hyphomycetes. Commonwealth Mycological Institute, Kew, England. 1971. (4) S. Taba et al. J. Gen. Plant Pathol. 73:374, 2007.
