Aetiology of Significant Liver Test Abnormalities in a Single-Centre Cohort of People with Cystic Fibrosis Exposed to Elexacaftor/Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor, Utilizing the Updated RUCAM.

BACKGROUND: The cystic fibrosis (CF) transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulator elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (E/T/I) has been associated with substantial multisystem benefits for people with CF eligible for therapy. In a minority, tolerance has been limited by hepatic toxicity. It is unknown whether there may be particular risk factors for significant drug-induced elevation in transaminases. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine the cause of raised transaminases following the introduction of E/T/I, and whether E/T/I can safely be continued in some individuals with elevated transaminases. METHODS: At a large, single, adult CF centre, individuals with transaminases >3 × the upper limit of normal (ULN) since commencing E/T/I underwent clinical assessment to exclude known causes of raised transaminases. Where an alternative cause could not be identified, individuals were discussed with hepatology to advise on further investigations to establish aetiology in addition to calculation of the updated Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method (RUCAM) score to assess causality grading of drug-induced liver injury (DILI) due to E/T/I, and to guide management of ongoing CFTR modulator therapy. RESULTS: Of 337 adults taking E/T/I for a median of 27 months, 19 (5.6%) had transaminases >3 × ULN. In 12 individuals, there was clear evidence of an aetiology unrelated to E/T/I (RUCAM scores -2 to 1 [excluded-unlikely]). Of the remaining cases, two had RUCAM scores in the 'possible' range and one had a RUCAM score in the 'probable' range. Liver biopsy was performed in four individuals, showing hepatic steatosis in one individual, normal histology in one individual, and hepatocyte necrosis suggestive of DILI in two individuals. E/T/I was suspended in those with hepatocyte necrosis, with one permanent discontinuation due to synthetic dysfunction. One individual with hepatocyte necrosis on histology was successfully re-established on E/T/I therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Alternative causes were identified in the majority of patients with clinically significant increases in transaminases following E/T/I, highlighting the importance of thorough investigation. Multidisciplinary assessment involving an experienced hepatologist is crucial in cases of diagnostic uncertainty or suggestion of significant DILI, as discontinuation of therapy can have significant consequences for individuals.

Survey of liver pathologists to assess attitudes towards digital pathology and artificial intelligence.

AIMS: A survey of members of the UK Liver Pathology Group (UKLPG) was conducted, comprising consultant histopathologists from across the UK who report liver specimens and participate in the UK National Liver Pathology External Quality Assurance scheme. The aim of this study was to understand attitudes and priorities of liver pathologists towards digital pathology and artificial intelligence (AI). METHODS: The survey was distributed to all full consultant members of the UKLPG via email. This comprised 50 questions, with 48 multiple choice questions and 2 free-text questions at the end, covering a range of topics and concepts pertaining to the use of digital pathology and AI in liver disease. RESULTS: Forty-two consultant histopathologists completed the survey, representing 36% of fully registered members of the UKLPG (42/116). Questions examining digital pathology showed respondents agreed with the utility of digital pathology for primary diagnosis 83% (34/41), second opinions 90% (37/41), research 85% (35/41) and training and education 95% (39/41). Fatty liver diseases were an area of demand for AI tools with 80% in agreement (33/41), followed by neoplastic liver diseases with 59% in agreement (24/41). Participants were concerned about AI development without pathologist involvement 73% (30/41), however, 63% (26/41) disagreed when asked whether AI would replace pathologists. CONCLUSIONS: This study outlines current interest, priorities for research and concerns around digital pathology and AI for liver pathologists. The majority of UK liver pathologists are in favour of the application of digital pathology and AI in clinical practice, research and education.