Predicting individual feed requirements of cattle fed in groups.

A published model designed to predict individual feed required for the observed shrunk BW and ADG of growing cattle when fed in groups was modified and evaluated to improve its accuracy. This model is needed to accurately bill feed and compute cost of gain in marketing programs based on individual animal management. Because of its importance in predicting energy required for growth, a database of 401 steers was used to develop an equation to predict percentage of empty-body fat (EBF) from carcass measurements (12th rib fat thickness, hot carcass weight, USDA quality grade, and longissimus muscle area), which accounted for 61% of the variation in EBF with no bias (P > 0.1). When tested with an independent data set of 951 steers, the equation accounted for 51% of the variation with 1% proportional bias. The large variation in the carcass measurements at a particular EBF observed in this study indicates further improvement is limited by the inability of carcass measurements to account for variation in fat distribution in the various carcass components. Because of its importance in setting the target end point, a database of 1,355 steers and heifers was used to determine the relationship between EBF and USDA quality grade. These data indicate growing and finishing cattle reach Select and low-Choice quality grades at an EBF of 26.15 +/- 0.19 and 28.61 +/- 0.20%, respectively (P < 0.05). A data set of 228 steers from different breeds from two serial slaughter studies indicated 14.26 +/- 1.52 kg of empty BW change are required to increase EBF one percentage unit for cattle fed high-energy diets; this adjustment is needed to adjust final shrunk BW to the target EBF end point. The model to predict DM required with modifications developed in this study was evaluated with data from 365 individually fed cattle and it accounted for 74% of the variation in observed DM consumed with no bias (P > 0.1). When the revised model was applied to a commercial feedlot data set containing 12,105 steers and heifers, the total observed DM consumed was predicted with a bias of less than 1%. The model presented in this study accounts for differences known to affect animal requirements (breed type, BW and ADG, and weight at the target EBF end point) and can be used to fairly allocate feed to individuals fed in a group under commercial feedlot conditions.

Influence of high-starch vs high-fiber energy supplements on performance of stocker cattle grazing wheat pasture and subsequent feedlot performance.

A 3-yr study was conducted to determine effects of high-starch (HS) or high-fiber (HF) energy supplements on performance of fall-weaned steer calves (n = 192, Exp. 1 and 2; n = 84, Exp. 3) grazing winter wheat pasture (Triticum aestivum variety 2157) and subsequent feedlot performance. The steers received 1) no supplement (CL) other than free-choice access to a commercial mineral mixture or 2) were hand-fed 6 d/wk either a corn-based HS supplement, or 3) a soybean hull/wheat middling-based HF supplement. In Exp. 1 (1989-1990), a fourth treatment provided ad libitum access to the HF supplement (SFHF). Supplements contained 88 mg of monensin/kg and the combination of ionophore, minerals and salt (8%) was used to limit intake of the SFHF supplement. Target level of daily consumption of all supplements was .75% of mean BW. Stocking density was increased by 33% (i.e., from 1.24 to 1.65 steers/ha) in Exp. 1 and 3, and by 22 to 44% in Exp. 2 when supplements were fed. Subsequent to grazing wheat pasture in Exp. 2 and 3, feedlot performance and carcass quality (Exp. 2 only) of the cattle were measured. Over the 3-yr period (pooled analysis), mean daily supplement consumption was .65% BW. Daily gains were increased (P < .001) .15 kg by supplementation and were .92, 1.06, and 1.08 kg for CL, HS, and HF, respectively. Daily gains were not influenced (P > .45) by type of energy supplement. Mean supplement conversions (kilograms asfed.kilogram of increased gain-1.hectare-1) were 5.4 for HS and 5.0 for HF and did not differ (P > .95). Subsequent feedlot daily gain was decreased .09 kg (P < .05) by supplementation in Exp. 2 but not in Exp. 3 (P > .80). This supplementation program for growing cattle on wheat pasture allowed stocking density to be increased by approximately one-third and increased daily gains by .15 kg.