ABSTRACT
Epidemiologic studies of pesticides have been subject to important biases arising from exposure misclassification. Although turf applicators are exposed to a variety of pesticides, these exposures have not been well characterized. This paper describes a repeated measures study of 135 TruGreen applicators over three spraying seasons via the collection of 1028 urine samples. These applicators were employed in six cities across the United States. Twenty-four-hour estimates (µg) were calculated for the parent compounds 2,4-D, MCPA, mecoprop, dicamba, and imidacloprid and for the insecticide metabolites MPA and 6-CNA. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the urinary levels of these pesticides, whereas mixed models were applied to describe the variance apportionment with respect to city, season, individual, and day of sampling. The contributions to the overall variance explained by each of these factors varied considerably by the type of pesticide. The implications for characterizing exposures in these workers within the context of a cohort study are discussed.
Subject(s)
Biomarkers/urine , Occupational Exposure/statistics & numerical data , Pesticide Residues/urine , Pesticides , Adult , Body Burden , Female , Humans , Insect Control , Male , Middle Aged , Pesticide Residues/pharmacokinetics , Pesticides/pharmacokinetics , Pesticides/urine , United States , Weed Control , Young AdultABSTRACT
The purity profile for porcine secretin attributable to contamination by equilibrium products such as aspartoyl(3) secretin has been shown to be dependent on the pH of the analytical system. Capillary zone electrophoresis (CZE) methods have been developed for the efficient separation of synthetic porcine secretin, its equilibrium products and other impurities in aqueous solutions at both acidic and alkaline pH. These conditions are more representative of those used for the reconstitution and administration of porcine secretin, and good results cannot be achieved using HPLC due to poor peak shape above pH 5.8. The influence of various CZE operational parameters was systematically examined. The methods were validated for accuracy, precision, linearity, LOD and LOQ. A comparative evaluation of the stability of test solutions was determined using CZE and HPLC over a range of pH values. HPLC and CZE methods produced similar results at low pH.
