ABSTRACT
The seaweed fly mating system is characterized by pre-mating struggles during which females exhibit a mate rejection response involving kicking, shaking and abdominal curling. Males must resist rejection until females become passive and allow copulation to take place. However, despite the vigorous nature of the struggle males frequently dismount passive females without attempting copulation. Here we show that rejected females suffered higher post-encounter mortality rates than those accepted by males in the seaweed fly Gluma musgravei. Furthermore, we show that males also preferentially mounted females with higher future longevity. We propose that this male mate choice for female survivorship has evolved as a result of females often having to survive for long periods after mating until suitable oviposition sites become available. Such male preferences for female survivorship may be common in species in which oviposition must sometimes be substantially delayed after mating.
Subject(s)
Diptera/physiology , Sexual Behavior, Animal/physiology , Animals , Biological Evolution , Copulation/physiology , Female , Longevity/physiology , Male , Oviposition/physiologyABSTRACT
Sexual selection is thought to be responsible for the evolution of exaggerated male characters and of female mate preferences. Evolutionary mechanisms driven by an advantage to the progeny are only effective if the preferred character has a large genetic component of variance; in most systems in which sexual selection operates, little is known of the relevant genetics. We have measured parent-offspring correlations, and report here that the preferred character (adult size) in seaweed flies has large additive genetic variance in males, but not in females. Virtually all the variance in male size is attributable to a chromosomal inversion system and, consequently, because this system is also a major determinant of larval viability, male size could be used by females as a reliable indicator of offspring survival.