Once-daily dosing with budesonide/formoterol compared with twice-daily budesonide/formoterol and once-daily budesonide in adults with mild to moderate asthma.

Adherence to maintenance therapy is often poor in patients with asthma. Simplifying dosing regimens has the potential to improve both adherence and asthma-related morbidity. In this 12-week, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group study, 617 patients with mild to moderate persistent asthma (mean forced expiratory volume in 1s [FEV1] 78.5% predicted) who were not optimally controlled on inhaled corticosteroids (200-500 microg/day) were randomized to once-daily budesonide/formoterol (80/4.5 microg, 2 inhalations in the evening), twice-daily budesonide/formoterol (80/4.5 microg, 1 inhalation), or a corresponding dose of budesonide once-daily (200 microg, 1 inhalation in the evening). All patients received budesonide (100 microg twice daily) during a 2-week run-in. Changes in mean morning peak expiratory flow (PEF) were similar for od budesonide/formoterol (23.4 l/min) and twice-daily budesonide/formoterol (24.1 l/min), and both were greater than with budesonide (5.5 l/min; both P<0.001). Evening PEF, symptom-free days, reliever-free days, and asthma control days were improved with budesonide/formoterol therapy vs. budesonide (P<0.05 vs. budesonide for all variables). All treatments were well tolerated. Budesonide/formoterol administered once daily in the evening is a convenient treatment regimen that is as effective in improving asthma control as twice-daily dosing in patients with mild to moderate persistent asthma.

Profiles of measured and perceived bronchodilation. A placebo-controlled cross-over trial comparing formoterol and salmeterol in moderate persistent asthma.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Long-acting beta(2)-agonists have acquired an indispensable position in the management of bronchial symptoms in patients with asthma. The objective of this study was to compare onset-of-action and clinical effectiveness of formoterol and salmeterol during 2 weeks of treatment. We also investigated the association between bronchodilator effects and perceived relieve of dyspnoea. METHODS: A multi-centre randomized double-blind placebo-controlled cross-over trial was performed in 35 subjects with moderate persistent asthma. Treatment periods existed of 2 weeks formoterol (12 microg bid), salmeterol (50 microg bid) and placebo, all administered by pressurized metered dose inhaler. FEV(1) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores were repeatedly measured until 180 min post-bronchodilation (post-BD), before as well as after each treatment period. Onset-of-action was defined as a >/=15% increase in FEV(1). Subjects kept diaries of morning and evening PEFR values and use of rescue bronchodilator. RESULTS: Formoterol and salmeterol both caused a significant increase in FEV(1) (0.45L [95% CI 0.01, 0.80] and 0.27L [95% CI 0.08, 0.62] respectively). At 3' post-BD, three times as many subjects demonstrated onset-of-action on formoterol compared to salmeterol (36% versus 13%, P = 0.063), at 6' post-BD 42% versus 27% (P = 0.063). VAS scores were similar for formoterol and salmeterol at pre-treatment assessment, but tended to be higher for formoterol after 2weeks treatment. No differences between formoterol and salmeterol were observed for PEFR values or use of rescue medication. 50% of the subjects preferred formoterol, 29% salmeterol (P < 0.001). Significant associations between FEV(1) and VAS ratings existed only at 10', 15' and 30' post-BD, not before or after these time points. CONCLUSION: The earlier described faster onset-of-action of formoterol as compared to a equipotent dosage of salmeterol was confirmed in this study. Perception of decreasing airflow obstruction may be delayed after acute bronchodilation.

Comparable efficacy and tolerability of formoterol (Foradil) administered via a novel multi-dose dry powder inhaler (Certihaler) or the Aerolizer dry powder inhaler in patients with persistent asthma.

BACKGROUND: For maximum treatment compliance there is a need to provide asthma patients with devices that suit their particular preferences. The Foradil Certihaler is a novel multi-dose dry powder inhaler developed to increase the choice of devices available. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of formoterol administered via the Foradil Certihaler, or via the single-dose inhaler Foradil Aerolizer. METHODS: This was a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-dummy, incomplete block crossover, dose-ranging and pharmacokinetic study in patients with persistent asthma. Sixty-seven patients (mean 48.0 years) were randomized to formoterol 5, 10, 15 and 30 microg twice daily via the Certihaler, 12 microg formoterol b.i.d. via the Aerolizer, or placebo in four 1-week double-blind treatment periods separated by 1-week single-blind washouts. RESULTS All formoterol doses delivered via the Certihaler or the Aerolizer significantly increased FEV(1) compared with placebo (p < 0.0001). Formoterol demonstrated an onset of action of <3 min. All active treatments were well tolerated. Tremor was the most common adverse event and was more pronounced at high doses. At lower doses the incidence of tremor with the Certihaler was similar to that observed with placebo or the Aerolizer. The pharmacokinetic evaluation comprised 41 patients (mean 45.9 years). Urinary excretion of unchanged formoterol and total formoterol increased with dose delivered via the Certihaler. The optimum dose of formoterol via the Certihaler was 10 microg. CONCLUSION: Delivery of formoterol via the Certihaler or Aerolizer combines rapid relief with enduring control and provides convenient bronchodilation in patients with persistent asthma.

Once-daily budesonide/formoterol in a single inhaler in adults with moderate persistent asthma.

Patients with moderate persistent asthma (n = 523; mean FEV1 77.4%) not fully controlled with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS; 400-1000 microg/day) were randomized to receive either once-daily budesonide/formoterol (160/4.5 microg, two inhalations); or twice-daily budesonide/formoterol (160/4.5 microg, one inhalation); or budesonide (400 microg) once-daily for 12 weeks. Once-daily dosing was administered in the evening and twice-daily dosing was administered in the morning and evening. All patients received twice-daily budesonide (200 microg) during a 2-week run-in. Compared with budesonide alone, change in mean morning and evening peak expiratory flow was greater in the once-daily budesonide/formoterol group (27 and 171 min(-1), respectively; P < 0.001) and twice-daily budesonide/formoterol group (23 and 24 l min(-1), respectively; P < 0.001). Night awakenings, symptom-free days, reliever-use-free days and asthma-control days were all improved during once-daily budesonide/formoterol therapy vs. budesonide (P < or = 0.05). Similar improvements were also seen with twice-daily budesonide/formoterol (P < or = 0.05). The risk of a mild exacerbation was reduced after once- and twice-daily budesonide/formoterol vs. budesonide (38% and 35%, respectively; P < 0.002). All treatments were well tolerated. Budesonide/formoterol, once- or twice-daily, in a single inhaler improved asthma symptoms and exacerbations compared with budesonide. In the majority of patients with moderate persistent asthma requiring ICS and long-acting beta-agonists, once-daily formoterol/budesonide provided sustained efficacy over 24 h, similar to twice-daily dosing.

An efficient and reproducible method for measuring hydrogen peroxide in exhaled breath condensate.

We investigated the sensitivity and reproducibility of a test procedure for measuring hydrogen peroxide (H202) in exhaled breath condensate and the effect of storage of the condensate on the H2O2 concentration, and compared the results to previous studies. Twenty stable COPD patients breathed into our collecting device twice for a period of 10 min. The total exhaled air volume (EAV) and condensate volume were measured both times and the H2O2 concentration of the condensate was determined fluorimetrically. The concentration was measured again after freezing the reaction product at -70 degrees C for a period of 10, 20 and 40 days. We collected 2-5 ml condensate in 10 min. The EAV and condensate volumes were strongly correlated. There was no significant difference between the mean H2O2 concentration of the first and second test. We obtained a detect on limit for the H2O2 concentration of 0.02 micromoll(-1). The H2O2 concentration appeared to remain stable for a period up to 40 days of freezing. Compared to previous studies we developed a more efficient breath condensate collecting device and obtained a lower H2O2 detection limit. The measurement of exhaled H2O2 was reproducible. In addition, storage of the samples up to 40 days showed no changes in H2O2 concentration.

Cilomilast, a selective phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor for treatment of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomised, dose-ranging study.

BACKGROUND: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a common, progressive respiratory disease that causes great morbidity and mortality despite treatment. There is evidence for airway inflammation in COPD. Cilomilast is an orally active, potent, selective phosphodiesterase type 4 inhibitor, which in vitro can affect cells thought to be of clinical importance in COPD. Our aim was to assess the safety, efficacy, and dose response of cilomilast in the treatment of patients with this disease. METHODS: We did a 6-week, randomised, dose-ranging study in 424 patients with COPD (forced expiratory volume in 1 s [FEV(1)] 46.8% of predicted, FEV(1)/forced vital capacity [FVC] 54.6%, and postsalbutamol reversibility 5.4%). We randomly assigned individuals at 60 European centres to receive cilomilast 5 (n=109), 10 (n=102), or 15 (n=107) mg twice daily, or placebo (n=106). The main outcome measure was trough FEV(1) before and after use of a bronchodilator. Analyses were by intention to treat. FINDINGS: Cilomilast 15 mg twice daily significantly improved FEV(1) compared with placebo (mean 130 mL vs -30 mL [95% CI 90-240] at week 6, p<0.0001). FVC and peak expiratory flow were also improved (p=0.001 and p<0.0001, respectively). Quality of life measures did not differ significantly between the groups. There were no significant differences in serious adverse events between the groups. INTERPRETATION: Cilomilast 15 mg twice daily might be an effective maintenance treatment for COPD. Further clinical studies are underway.

Delivery of fenoterol via Respimat, a novel 'soft mist' inhaler. a randomised, double-blind (within device), placebo-controlled, cross-over, dose-ranging study in asthmatic patients.

BACKGROUND: The phase-out of chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) for metered dose inhalers (MDIs) has prompted the development of alternative propellants and the design of propellant-free devices for inhalation therapy. OBJECTIVE: This study was carried out to determine the dose of fenoterol inhaled from Respimat (RMT), a new propellant-free soft mist inhaler, which is equivalent in terms of efficacy and safety to 1 puff of either 100 or 200 microg fenoterol inhaled from a conventional CFC-MDI (Berotec). METHODS: Sixty-two asthmatic patients (35 male, 27 female) with a mean baseline FEV(1) of 1.7 liters, corresponding to 55% of the predicted normal value, were randomized at two study centers to 4 of a total of 8 possible treatments: placebo; 12.5, 25, 50, 100, or 200 microg fenoterol via RMT, and 100 or 200 microg fenoterol delivered via the MDI. RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients completed the study as planned. Results of the therapeutic equivalence test for the primary endpoint, average FEV(1) (AUC(0-6))/6 and for the secondary endpoint, peak FEV(1), showed that the 12.5- and 25-microg fenoterol doses administered via RMT were equivalent to the 100 microg fenoterol dose from the MDI. The 50-, 100- and 200-microg fenoterol doses delivered by RMT did not meet the criterion for therapeutic equivalence with the 100-microg dose from the MDI, and if tested for a difference would have been significantly different in favor of RMT. All 5 RMT fenoterol doses were therapeutically equivalent to the MDI 200-microg fenoterol dose. Headache, reported by 4 patients on test days and 2 patients between test days in those randomized to RMT, was the most common adverse event, but the active treatments were generally well tolerated with no dose-dependent increases in incidence or severity of adverse events observed. CONCLUSIONS: The results from the study suggest that safe and efficacious bronchodilation can be obtained from single-dose fenoterol administered via RMT. Use of lower absolute doses to obtain a clinically significant improvement in pulmonary function may be possible because of the increased lung deposition achievable with the novel soft mist inhaler.