Comparison of blood activation in the wound, active vent, and cardiopulmonary bypass circuit.

BACKGROUND: During cardiopulmonary bypass, aspirated blood exhibits strong activation features, but the triggering event remains unclear. Contact of blood with the pericardial cavity and surgical wound has been advocated as the main trigger, but suction forces are also considered as a possible contributor. We thus designed a study to identify the possible causes involved in this activation. METHODS: In 10 patients, we analyzed hemostasis activation markers and inflammatory mediators in blood collected in the pericardial cavity and in blood actively aspirated from the left ventricle without any contact with the pericardial cavity. In addition, the same variables were determined in blood sampled in the cardiopulmonary bypass circuit. RESULTS: Markers of tissue factor pathway activation and of thrombin generation, microparticles, free hemoglobin, interleukin 6, and tumor necrosis factor-alpha were significantly increased in pericardial samples as compared with the left ventricle and cardiopulmonary bypass circuit samples. All measured variables were similar between left ventricle and cardiopulmonary bypass samples, except free hemoglobin, interleukin 6, and microparticle levels, which were significantly higher in the left ventricle. CONCLUSIONS: Blood contact with the pericardial cavity induces strong hemolysis, inflammatory mediator release, and coagulation activation, driven by tissue factor pathway activation. By contrast, suction forces applied to left ventricular blood poorly contribute to blood trauma and activation. Comparison of pericardial and left ventricular blood shows that contact with the pericardial cavity, and not suction forces, is the leading cause of blood activation. The specific trigger for blood trauma and activation present in the pericardial cavity remains to be identified.

Second generation of minimal invasive extracorporeal circuit: pilot study resting heart system.

Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) has evolved from a complex multifunctional system to the minimally invasive extracorporeal circuit (MIEC). Concerns currently exist regarding the technically demanding nature of off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) procedures, the quality of anastomosis associated with it, and the difficulty in achieving "complete revascularization." Recognizing these issues, the so-called mini-CPB concept has evolved in an effort to offer the perceived benefits of OPCAB with the technical advantages of CPB and at the same time minimize the adverse effects of full-scale CPB. The first generation of MIEC had an inherited risk of gas embolisms. Therefore, there was the introduction of the resting heart system (RHS), the main characteristic of which is the venous air removal device. The aim of this study was to describe our early experience, feasibility, and safety with this system to help others who are considering introducing this technique into their clinical practice. Using this system, we operated on 30 consecutive patients. Moderate hypothermia (33 degrees C) CPB and cold intermittent antegrade cardioplegia was used. No technical incidents were encountered. One death from multiorgan failure occurred in a patient operated on for a thoraco-abdominal aneurysm. Our own short-term experience with the RHS has been very favorable, and we will continue to explore this development in CPB technology.

Right ventricular assist device thrombosis during biventricular heart assistance.

We report a case of total thrombosis of a right ventricular assist device in a patient during biventricular assistance. The thrombosis occurred 18 days following implantation and the right ventricular device was immediately removed without any complications. The patient was successfully transplanted after 3 months of left ventricular assistance.