Resolution of vascular inflammation in patients with new-onset giant cell arteritis: data from the RIGA study.

OBJECTIVES: Efficacy evaluation of GCA treatment is primarily based on non-specific symptoms and laboratory markers. We aimed to assess the change in vascular inflammation in patients with large vessel (LV)-GCA under different treatments using [18F]FDG PET/CT. METHODS: Observational study on patients with new-onset, active LV-GCA starting treatment with either prednisolone monotherapy (PRED) or combination with MTX or tocilizumab (TOC). All patients underwent baseline and follow-up PET/CT. The aorta and its major branches were assessed using PET vascular activity score (PETVAS) by independent readers. Cumulative glucocorticoid doses and cessation of glucocorticoid treatment were documented in all patients. RESULTS: We included 88 LV-GCA patients, 27 were treated with PRED, 42 with MTX and 19 with TOC. PETVAS decreased from 18.9-8.0 units at follow-up in the overall population (P <0.001). PETVAS changes were numerically higher in patients receiving MTX (-12.3 units) or TOC (-11.7 units) compared with PRED (-8.7). Mean cumulative prednisolone dosages were 5637, 4418 and 2984 mg in patients treated with PRED, MTX and TOC (P =0.002). Risk ratios for glucocorticoid discontinuation at the time of follow-up PET/CT were 6.77 (95% CI: 1.01, 45.29; P =0.049) and 16.25 (95% CI: 2.60, 101.73; P =0.003) for MTX and TOC users compared with PRED users. CONCLUSION: Treatment of LV-GCA inhibits vascular inflammation in the aorta and its major branches. While similar control of vascular inflammation was achieved with PRED, MTX and TOC treatments, TOC showed a strong glucocorticoid sparing effect, supporting the concept of initial combination therapy.

Aortic dilatation in patients with large vessel vasculitis: A longitudinal case control study using PET/CT.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate aortic diameter and predictors of aortic dilatation using 18FDG-PET/CT in a longitudinally followed cohort of patients with large vessel vasculitis (LVV) compared with controls. METHODS: All consecutive patients with LVV who underwent at least 2 PET/CT scans between January 2008 and May 2015 were included. The first and last PET/CT study was evaluated by a radiologist and a nuclear medicine physician. Diameter and FDG uptake of the aorta was measured at 4 different levels: ascending, descending thoracic, suprarenal and infrarenal abdominal aorta. Twenty-nine age- and sex-matched patients with lymphoma who underwent at least 2 PET/CT scans in the same time interval were selected as controls. RESULTS: 93 patients with LVV were included in the study. In the time interval between first and last PET/CT study (median time 31 months), the diameter of the ascending, descending thoracic and suprarenal abdominal aorta significantly increased in LVV patients but not in controls. At last PET/CT, patients with LVV compared with controls had higher diameter of ascending [35.41 (5.54) vs 32.97 (4.11) mm, p = 0.029], descending thoracic [28.42 (4.82) vs 25.72 (3.55) mm, p = 0.007] and suprarenal abdominal aorta, mean [25.34 (7.01) vs 22.16 (3.26) mm, p = 0.005] and more frequently had aortic dilatation [19% vs 3%, p = 0.023]. Significant predictors of aortic dilatation were male sex [OR 7.27, p = 0.001] and, only for GCA, hypertension [OR 6.30, p = 0.031]. Finally, GCA patients with aortic FDG uptake grade 3 at first PET/CT, compared to those with aortic FDG uptake ≤2, had significantly higher aortic diameter. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with LVV are at increased risk of aortic dilatation compared with age- and sex-matched controls. Significant predictors of aortic dilatation are male sex and, only for GCA, hypertension. GCA patients with aortic FDG uptake grade 3 are at increased risk of aortic dilatation.

Rituximab therapy for Takayasu arteritis: a seven patients experience and a review of the literature.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy and safety of rituximab (RTX) in patients with Takayasu arteritis (TAK). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study on seven TAK patients treated with RTX. Six of the seven patients had a disease refractory to high dose glucocorticoids and conventional immunosuppressive and/or biologic agents. One newly diagnosed, treatment-naïve TAK patient refused glucocorticoids and received RTX alone. Clinical evaluation, laboratory tests and imaging modalities (CT or MR-angiography, and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT) were performed at first RTX administration and every 6 months thereafter. Disease activity was assessed using the Kerr index. We also performed a literature review using PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE and Cochrane library. RESULTS: Seven patients (6 females) were included in the study. Mean (s.d.) age was 32.4 (17.3) years. At first RTX administration, all patients had active disease according to the Kerr index (⩾2), and had also evidence of active disease at PET/CT. Despite RTX treatment, four of the seven patients had evidence of persistent disease activity and/or radiographic disease progression during follow-up. Three out of seven patients in whom RTX was employed as rescue therapy achieved complete remission. In the literature review, we identified five papers describing nine patients treated with RTX with good results in eight cases, but short follow-up. CONCLUSION: Our data do not support a role for RTX as first line biologic therapy in TAK patients, but it may have a role in some patients as second or third line biologic therapy.

Diagnosis and treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in the Emilia Romagna region: a prospective population-based study.

OBJECTIVES: To perform a population-based study in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients, in order to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pharmacologic treatments. METHODS: 1087 patients with RA were enrolled; inclusion criteria were: newly diagnosed RA, already diagnosed RA with high disease activity (HDA) (DAS28≥4.2) starting biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs), already diagnosed RA with HDA continuing with conventional DMARDs (cDMARDs). The following data were collected: demographics, clinical and laboratory features, imaging and prescribed drugs. All parameters except immunology and imaging (performed yearly) were repeated at each follow-up evaluations (after 3, 6 and 12 months, and thereafter every 12 months). In order to evaluate clinical response, the EULAR response criteria were used as the gold standard. RESULTS: 414 (38.1%) newly diagnosed patients with RA, 477 (43.9%) RA patients who started bDMARDs and 196 (18.0%) RA patients who continued with cDMARDs were enrolled from April 2012 to March 2015 at 12 Rheumatology Centres in the Emilia Romagna Region. Statistical analyses showed a relative risk ratio (RRR) for moderate response of 1.65 in RA patients who started bDMARDs (p=0.16) and 2.49 for newly diagnosed RA (p=0.01). Sex, age and Health Assessment Questionnaire were not statistically significant. A RRR of 2.00 has been confirmed for RA patients who started bDMARDs (p<0.0005) for a good response as well as 2.20 for newly diagnosed RA (p<0.0005). An increase in adverse events among bDMARDs was found, but when looking at infections or neoplasia, no differences were highlighted between RA which started bDMARDs and RA who continued with cDMARDs. CONCLUSIONS: Our results are in line with already published papers from British and Swedish Registries: a greater likelihood to have a good response is demonstrated for not longstanding RA starting cDMARDs or RA with HDA when a bDMARD is started. Also a good safety profile is demonstrated.

Long-term remission in biopsy proven giant cell arteritis: A retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the frequency of long-term remission after glucocorticoids (GCs) suspension in an Italian cohort of patients with biopsy-proven GCA and to identify factors that may predict long-term remission. METHODS: We evaluated 131 patients with biopsy-proven transmural GCA diagnosed and followed up at the Rheumatology Unit of Reggio Emilia Hospital (Italy) for whom sufficient information was available from the time of diagnosis until at least 18 months of follow-up. Long-term remission was defined as complete clinical remission without elevation of inflammatory markers for at least one year after the GC withdrawal. RESULTS: 73 patients (56%) experienced long-term remission. Disease flares were less frequently observed in patients with long-term remission compared to those without (p = 0.002). The cumulative doses of prednisone at 1 year and for the entire followup duration were significantly lower (p < 0.0001 for both parameters) in patients with long-term remission; similarly, the duration of prednisone treatment was also significantly lower (p < 0.0001). The presence of PMR at diagnosis (HR 0.46) was significantly negatively associated with long-term remission (p = 0.008), while hemoglobin levels (HR 1.48) were significantly positively associated (p < 0.0001). Patients with long-term remission were able to reach 10 mg/day and 5 mg/day of prednisone sooner than the patients without (p = 0.02 and p < 0.0001, respectively). CONCLUSION: In our cohort of GCA patients around half of the patients were able to attain long-term remission. Recognition of findings which predict disease course may aid decisions regarding therapy.

Flares in Biopsy-Proven Giant Cell Arteritis in Northern Italy: Characteristics and Predictors in a Long-Term Follow-Up Study.

This study evaluated the frequency, timing, and characteristics of flares in a large cohort of Italian patients with biopsy-proven giant cell arteritis (GCA) and to identify factors at diagnosis able to predict the occurrence of flares. We evaluated 157 patients with biopsy-proven transmural GCA diagnosed and followed at the Rheumatology Unit of Reggio Emilia Hospital (Italy) for whom sufficient information was available from the time of diagnosis until at least 4 years of follow-up. Fifty-seven patients (36.5%) experienced ≥1 flares. Fifty-one (46.4%) of the 110 total flares (88 relapses and 22 recurrences) were experienced during the first 2 years after diagnosis. The majority of relapses occurred with doses of prednisone ≤ 10 mg/day (82.9%), whereas only 3.4% of relapses occurred for doses ≥ 25 mg/day. Polymyalgia rheumatica (46.5%) and cranial symptoms (41.9%) were the most frequent manifestations at the time of the first relapse. Cumulative prednisone dose during the first year and total cumulative prednisone dose were significantly higher in flaring patients compared with those without flares (7.8 ±â€Š2.4 vs 6.7 ±â€Š2.4 g, P = 0.02; 15.5 ±â€Š8.9 vs 10.0 ±â€Š9.2 g, P = 0.0001, respectively). The total duration of prednisone treatment was longer in flaring patients (58 ±â€Š44 vs 30 ±â€Š30 months, P = 0.0001).Patients with disease flares had at diagnosis more frequently systemic manifestations (P = 0.02) and fever ≥ 38°C (P = 0.02), significantly lower hemoglobin levels (P = 0.05), more frequent presence at temporal artery biopsy (TAB) specimens of giant cells (P = 0.04) and intraluminal acute thrombosis (P = 0.007), and more moderate/severe arterial inflammation (P = 0.009) compared with those without flares. In the multivariate model fever ≥ 38 °C (hazard ratio 2.14; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-4.32, P = 0.03) and the severity of inflammatory infiltrate (moderate/severe versus mild) (hazard ratio 5.41; 95% confidence interval, 1.64-17.87, P = 0.006) were significantly associated with an increased risk of flares. In conclusion, a flaring course is common in GCA and it is associated with prolonged GC requirements. Fever at diagnosis and severity of inflammation at TAB appear to predict the development of disease flares.