Mandibular Jaw Movement Automated Analysis for Oral Appliance Monitoring in Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Rationale: Oral appliances are second-line treatments after continuous positive airway pressure for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) management. However, the need for oral appliance titration limits their use as a result of monitoring challenges to assess the treatment effect on OSA. Objectives: To assess the validity of mandibular jaw movement (MJM) automated analysis compared with polysomnography (PSG) and polygraphy (PG) in evaluating the effect of oral appliance treatment and the effectiveness of MJM monitoring for oral appliance titration at home in patients with OSA. Methods: This observational, prospective study included 135 patients with OSA eligible for oral appliance therapy. The primary outcome was the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), measured through in-laboratory PSG/PG and MJM-based technology. Additionally, MJM monitoring at home was conducted at regular intervals during the titration process. The agreement between PSG/PG and MJM automated analysis was revaluated using Bland-Altman analysis. Changes in AHI during the home-based oral appliance titration process were evaluated using a generalized linear mixed model and a generalized estimating equation model. Results: The automated MJM analysis demonstrated strong agreement with PG in assessing AHI at the end of titration, with a median bias of 0.24/h (limits of agreement, -11.2 to 12.8/h). The improvement of AHI from baseline in response to oral appliance treatment was consistent across three evaluation conditions: in-laboratory PG (-59.6%; 95% confidence interval, -59.8% to -59.5%), in-laboratory automated MJM analysis (-59.2%; -65.2% to -52.2%), and at-home automated MJM analysis (-59.7%; -67.4% to -50.2%). Conclusions: Incorporating MJM automated analysis into the oral appliance titration process has the potential to optimize oral appliance therapy outcomes for OSA.

Mandibular Movement Analysis to Assess Efficacy of Oral Appliance Therapy in OSA.

RATIONALE: The respiratory effort index derived from vertical mandibular movements (MM-REI) is a potential marker of increased respiratory effort during sleep. We evaluated the effectiveness of mandibular advancement splint therapy using MM-REI, in comparison with the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) and oxygen desaturation index (ODI). METHODS: Fifty-six subjects (median age, 47 years) with OSA treated with a custom mandibular advancement splint (Herbst appliance) were evaluated at the end of the titration procedure when snoring was reported absent by the sleep partner. We employed a magnetometer to capture mandibular movements (Brizzy; Nomics). Mandibular advancement splint efficacy was assessed as the percent change from baseline, using Bayesian multilevel models. RESULTS: At the end of titration, all indices of OSA severity decreased compared with baseline: AHI (-48.9% to -71.1%), ODI (-49.5% to -77.2%), with obstructive hypopnea index and MM-REI showing the largest responses (-70.6% to -88.5% and -69.5% to -96.3%, respectively). MM-REI normalization via reductions in both mandibular movement event rate and duration accurately reflected efficacy of the appliance. CONCLUSIONS: The reduction of vertical respiratory mandibular movements estimated by MM-REI and sleep respiratory effort duration accompanied the decrease in obstructive hypopneas, AHI, and ODI when snoring resolved in subjects with OSA treated with an optimally titrated mandibular advancement splint.